Posted on 02/24/2008 11:41:11 AM PST by SFC Chromey
In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
[Designed to create] “Unity of effort during bilateral support for civil support operations such as floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes and effects of a terrorist attack, in order to save lives, prevent human suffering and mitigate damage to property, is of the highest importance, and we need to be able to have forces that are flexible and adaptive to support rapid decision-making in a collaborative environment.”
I aint ascairt of the Canadians.
More red meat for those that see a black helicopter under every rock.
It was a bit obtuse... but here’s another thread. I’m not sure if it is the same article. I didn’t bother to check.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1975063/posts
Not the same source...
Sovereignty is so 20th century anyhow.
It was posted via another article last night. The left-wingers in Canada claim it’s a take over by the US, the right-wingers in the US claim it’s another step towards the North American Union.
It looks planning for our troops and guard to be in Iraq and elsewhere for 100 years will require some troops to be on guard here. But it might just be cheaper to outsource this duty to the Chinese like everything else.
This is the first step toward a three nation security agreement that sees internal borders lowered while external border remain. This will ease travel retrictions between nations.
By the time they are through, Federales will be added to the program. Won’t that be grand...
This is but one step in the plan to disolve our sovereignty and eventually our self-determination.
It looks so innocent the way they shape the press releases.
“More red meat for those that see a black helicopter under every rock.”
What establishment RNCers call “red meat”, we Conservatives and Nationalists call reality. I am ready for the establishment of the Nationalist Party.
Look at the positive side of that. You'll be able to bribe your way out of trouble.
I find it funny that this happened and the fact that every candidate for the White House is pro-amnesty and doesn’t support English as a national language. Welcome to the North American Union.
I guess its something for Corsi to talk about on Coast To Coast AM again, before the next UFO wave or Bigfoot sighting...
Just the US government royalty planning ahead in case our own sons and daughters hesitate when ordered to mow us down in the streets if we ever start thinking this is still our country.
Where is Mexico on this. They are already carrying out missions on US soil, as convoy cover for drug runners and illegal entries.
Oh. Not the Mexican Army at all, but some highly trained, well-equipped representatives of the private army that is in the service of the drug and human smuggling cartels.
And get the drugs you want all at the same time.
All a part of destroying the bridge to the future...
A few chunks of "red meat" like this and we'll have the whole cow..
This is just another step to ending the United States. A North American Union is only stopped by Ron Paul and the Constitution. We must win the convention. McCain will loose to Clinton and she will install a North American Union in 2010. Get ready!
>Look at the positive side of that. You’ll be able to bribe your way out of trouble.<
For a whole lot less than what it costs now!
Let me guess... Corsi’s next column will claim that Canadians will be forced to pay in Ameros when driving on the Texas Trans Intercontinental Super highway, and “they” know that there will be rioting and so want to be able to call in the US army to “put down” citizens.
More red meat for those that see a black helicopter under every rock.
I see the Staged Moon Landing/Capricorn One crowd is still around
I am not exactly worried about the Canadian Armed Forces, as to a great extent they have already become an adjunct of our own armed forces. In matters of national defense, Canada is a de facto protectorate, an subarctic Puerto Rico. However, the precedent it sets could be dangerous. The thought of the Mexican Army patrolling Los Angeles, Dallas, or Houston in case of race riots is chilling. It is hard to imagine then not siding with their co-ethnics in conflicts with African Americans.
A scenario that should scare the hell out of everyone
LOL, ged ouda here...
Yep, you’re here alright. If you can’t see what’s on the drawing board, then you’re one of them.
The politicians within our government are constantly moving toward the erasing of our sovereignty. They know what they are doing.
When the time comes I hope there are still a few patriots willing and able to put an end to it all.
I see that you wrote 24 and 25. Bud, in certain ways they are contradicting of each other. You see the problem as it relates to Federales on our soil, and then seek to trash folks who also recognize that problem and what the larger picture is.
Can’t you see what direction we’re headed in, and that it isn’t good? Why expend your energy dumping on folks who would rather sound the alarm sounded now, than have to deal with something that is a week or two from becoming a reality?
“sound the alarm “
Shhhh, we’re not supposed to know.
Are you saying that Canada and the US did not just agree to some "Civil Assistance Plan"? If so, what evidence do you have that Corsi fabricated this?
Would you be comfortable with the US making the same kind of Executive agreement with Mexico? How about with China under a President Obama?
Oh dang, that was a Code 142263982 violation. Ooops...
Globalism ping...
more good news from the great white north, eh
I would be willing to support a party that is both Conservative and Nationalist. But I suggest you substitute another word for Nationalist, perhaps ‘Patriot’ or ‘American’. There are too many negative associations with ‘Nationalist’.
I think you misunderstood my post. I am mocking those who see something “nefarious” in this, i.e. a “black helicopter under every rock”. Corsi knows his readers are easily duped and don’t think for themselves.
The answer to your first question: No.
Corsi is the messenger, why attack him for telling us what the government refuses to report on itself or have Congress authorize?
Just because Corsi is the one who’s telling, because the liberal lamestream complicit media refuses, doesn’t make the AGREEMENT to merge forces go away or non-factual.
By that philosophy, whatever Corsi writes is fiction, even when it’s article about illegals in America about whom the liberal media more often either won’t name or, if they do, hides behind the verbage of “undocumented.”
Half of the time, Corsi manufactures slants on stories that are absurd. I don’t like being treated like some low-IQ imbecile that falls for any old crap that some guy needs to write just to be make a living. You make it out as if he always reports “facts”. NOT!
What has he reported that is a lie?
I would like to know that, thanks.
“I find it funny that this happened and the fact that every candidate for the White House is pro-amnesty and doesn’t support English as a national language. Welcome to the North American Union.”
Not every candidate is pro-amnesty. Ron Paul isn’t.
European nations have been pretty good at maintaining their individuality(Muslim immigration aside) while still combining to become an economic force to rival the U.S.. It would make sense that the powers that be would look to give our hemisphere the economic strength to remain number one.
Reporter 'A' writes a whole series of stories how pedophiles recruit in men's rooms. Then, Reporter 'A' provides a "FACTUAL" story how politician 'B' just went into a men's room.
I do not understand your denying that this is actually happening though AmericasUnited.
George Washington doesn’t think I was speeding...what say you? ;-)
No, read it right here in Ronald Reagan's speech when he announced his candidacy on November 13,1979:
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.
It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.
By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale. We will put to rest any doubts of those cynical enough to believe that the United States would seek to dominate any relationship among our three countries, or foolish enough to think that the governments and peoples of Canada and Mexico would ever permit such domination to occur. I for one, am confident that we can show the world by example that the nations of North America are ready, within the context of an unswerving commitment to freedom, to see new forms of accommodation to meet a changing world. A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friends and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident of our future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries. Two hundred years ago, we taught the world that a new form of government, created out of the genius of man to cope with his circumstances, could succeed in bringing a measure of quality to human life previously thought impossible.
Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology, and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the people's commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do today.
Where did I do that?
There is a great deal of information that, after reading, one cannot come to any other conclusion than the fact that this government, over time, has been and continues to work toward, meshing together three sovereign territories...and, by necessity, incrementally eliminating the sovereignty/independence of each.
Other people/organizations, perhaps more credible to you, come out and can be read from: the Council on Foreign Relations, the conservative Eagle Forum, Judicial Watch, and even thomas.gov (for various bills proposed/passed).
Are you referring to me as one of your “doubters”?
Ronald Reagan gave the non-kook reasons (see post #45) why we should work closer together.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.