Posted on 02/26/2008 3:59:25 PM PST by SandRat
2/26/2008 - OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, Neb. (AFPN) -- When analysts determined a satellite carrying a tank of 1,000 pounds of hydrazine fuel could be a threat to human life, the U.S. Department of Defense and other agencies came together to find the best course of action.
More than two dozen federal agencies collaborated to shoot down the non-functional National Reconnaissance Office satellite Feb. 20. Their extraordinary efforts were a huge success.
The Global Operations Directorate, or J3, for U.S. Strategic Command led the planning and coordination of efforts between the Missile Defense Agency, the NRO, NASA and the Pacific Command, and did so in less than 60 days, culminating in the successful engagement of a derelict satellite.
"To think we could coordinate all details across 7,000 miles and make it look seamless is pretty amazing to think about," said Navy Rear Admiral Doug L. McClain, the director of Global Operations for USSTRATCOM.
Colonel Michael J. Carey, deputy director of Global Operations for the command commented that, "the talented people in J3 worked day and night in a remarkable feat that speaks to the ingenuity and teamwork of some great Americans."
"It was no doubt a challenge in the early stages," said Army Lt. Col. Chad Jones, chief of Joint Training for U.S. Strategic Command. "There was a lot of discovery learning, as we pulled experts together from across the communities to execute an operation that was never done before."
USSTRATCOM along with Pacific Command, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, NASA, Missile Defense Agency, and the NRO, to name just a few, worked tirelessly around the clock to determine the best possibility of mission success.
"Simulations and scenarios were run over and over again, each time getting closer to reaching the intent of the commander, who made the final decision," Colonel Jones said.
Concurrently, operational security was a top priority to ensure the data being gathered would not be used by adversaries.
"Intelligence experts, for weeks gathered information to see if there was any adversarial awareness of the event and how that may play in the decision process for leadership," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Steve Fahey, the chief of Space Intelligence Analysis for USSTRATCOM.
Although the mission, code named Operation Burnt Frost, is complete, intelligence is still being gathered to ensure national security and safety.
Along with intelligence concerns, there are political factors from the President's decision to intercept the satellite.
"On the one hand we had humanitarian implications, on the other hand we had technical implications, but the nature of the event also dealt with the field of diplomacy and international politics," said Kirk Augustine, the political advisor for USSTRATCOM.
"The action that the U.S. has taken complicates our diplomacy, but we had a significant amount of international support in the approach, and while it may not have been overwhelming support, there were many countries that agreed with us."
With the agencies pulling together to carry out the mission, all aspects were considered.
A recovery team, dubbed Joint Task Force-Burnt Frost, consisting of more than 15 government agencies, gathered at McGuire Air Force Base, N.J. The team was postured to recover debris and conduct consequence management operations following the shoot down if needed.
Among the many agencies involved were the armed services, U.S. Coast Guard, Environmental Protection Agency, NASA, NRO, the Department of Interior and a vast number of emergency responders.
Within those organizations, many of the team members were handpicked from across the nation and ranged in age from 20 to 61 years old. The expertise was crucial to the team, allowing chemical experts, hydrazine analysts and those that worked on the Columbia catastrophe to put their knowledge to carry out Operation Burnt Frost.
The joint team was prepared to go anywhere in the world on a moment's notice to gather the debris from the uncontrollable satellite.
Due to the relative low altitude of the engagement, approximately 130 miles, nearly all the debris has already entered the Earth's atmosphere. The remaining debris is expected to reenter within 40 days and should not affect any orbiting space systems, according to U.S. space analysts.
"The U.S. is committed to safe and responsible space operations," said Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, commander of USSTRATCOM. "This includes taking responsibility for our falling debris and doing everything possible to mitigate its impact for this engagement."
The extraordinary efforts across the U.S. government made it possible for Operation Burnt Frost's success. A satellite that may have caused harm to human life is no longer a threat and there are many agencies responsible for the outcome.
"The success of this unprecedented effort is due to the expertise, talent, hard work and tireless efforts of many people, all working together to reduce risks to people all over the world," said General Chilton. "I could not be prouder of the team. It could not have been done any better."
You would think any large satellites that could pose a danger on reentry would have self destruct mechanisms built in upon hitting the atmosphere. It had to come down eventually. Especially in the case of a spy satellite where they don't want anything being recoverable.
I'm not buying. There's more to this than meets the eye.
sub-rosa???
Yes, a VAST conspiracy that reaches to the highest levels of government along with the secret meetings with world leaders at area 51.
A satellite was targeted and blown out of space by an incredible weapons system produced by America. Period.
That is entirely plausible. Good enough.
True. Because you and I didn't SEE anything. You don't even know that it actually happened. So anything their PR offices create would be suspect to you on that basis, right? Ironically, the only reason you believe that it happened is not because the USAF said it did, but because you expect that if they were lying that the Chicom and Russian PR arms would be screaming to the roof!
So why do you believe or disbelieve the "why" that they tell you? Who's 'liars' do you trust more....ours or theirs?
I'm not buying.
You are not their target customer. =)
WHOSE! Durnit.
FYI, Hydrazine in N2H4.
When it meets a catalytic agent, the catalyst chamber can reach 800 Celsius in milliseconds. It needs no igniter, so it is very mechanically simple, using just a valve. A small amount of Hydrazine creates a very large volume of gas.
Ah, but with Barry O in charge, we first would sit down and dialogue about it interminably.
Hydrazine is highly unstable, what are the odds it would have survived in a high pressure tank through reentry?
I bet the odds are very close to zero.
Just the mass of the satellite coming down being dangerous would have been a more believable claim than the hydrazine.
Now I’m all for demonstrating to our enemies that we mean business and that our defensive systems aren’t smoke and mirrors. It just seems the official story is a little thin...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.