Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M203M4

I don’t get it. If they don’t put the fire out then plants and animals will certainly die. Possibly humans too.


4 posted on 02/26/2008 9:40:42 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg

I haven’t read the case, but my guess is that the judge (and the law he’s relying on) focus on persistent “threats” to the environment. Of course an uncontrolled fire will kill plenty of plants and animals, but it is a temporary event and, in a way, a natural process to which living things have had time to adapt. If, to fight that temporary destructive process, you put something into the environment that is not “natural” to that local area, then you might be causing more long term harm than short term good. All that said, I personally think we should go after fires with whatever we’ve got that works most effectively and economically. I don’t discount the long term harm argument in principle, but I don’t think we currently know enough to be able to predict long term consequences.


6 posted on 02/27/2008 3:41:17 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson