Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sixty-Six Percent Say 'Smear!'
Captain's Quarters ^ | Feb. 27, 2008 | by Ed Morrissey

Posted on 02/27/2008 5:41:25 PM PST by jdm

The New York Times marks another milestone on its journey to National Enquirer status. The Gray Lady's smear piece on John McCain got 66% of Rasmussen respondents believing that the paper deliberately trying to kneecap the Republican frontrunner. Only 22% think that the paper had clean motives in publishing the unsubstantiated gossip:

The Times recently became enmeshed in controversy over an article published concerning John McCain. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the nation’s likely voters say they have followed that story at least somewhat closely.

Of those who followed the story, 66% believe it was an attempt by the paper to hurt the McCain campaign. Just 22% believe the Times was simply reporting the news. Republicans, by an 87% to 9% margin, believe the paper was trying to hurt McCain’s chances of winning the White House. Democrats are evenly divided.

Let's take a look at the crosstabs. Among age groups, a majority in each demographic believe that the NYT deliberately set out to damage McCain's reputation. The youngest give Bill Keller and company the most credit, with 34% believing that the Times was just reporting the news, as opposed to 53% who believed that the paper aimed to smear McCain. No other age demographic has more than 23% who believe that the Times operated with pure motives, and two-thirds across all other ages believe that they acted out of malice.

It doesn't get better in the other demographics, either. Whites, blacks, and "others" all strongly believe that Keller and his reporters acted maliciously. Sixty-nine percent of independents joined 40% of Democrats and 85% of Republicans in that belief. Only self-professed liberals believe that the Times used sound news judgment in running the piece; conservatives and moderates overwhelmingly blame bias and malice. And only liberals and 18-29 year olds view the Times more favorably than unfavorably.

The Times, under the management of Bill Keller and especially Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger, has reduced what had been the nation's premiere newspaper to the credibility of a supermarket tabloid. People used to think conservatives overreacted to the attack memes of the Gray Lady. Now only liberals defend the paper -- and only then by the barest of majorities.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; howtostealanelection; mccain; nytimes; rasmussen; smear; yellowjournalism; zogbyism
"Smear today, gone tomorrow."


1 posted on 02/27/2008 5:41:28 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Borrowed your graphic. Hope it’s okay...


2 posted on 02/27/2008 5:42:05 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The difference between the Old Grey Whore and the Enquirer? Occasionally, there is a believable story in the Enquirer.


3 posted on 02/27/2008 5:45:01 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Soon the NYT front page headlines will have “Aliens From Outer Space Support Obama” accompanied with a photos.


4 posted on 02/27/2008 5:45:35 PM PST by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Actually the Enquirer is usually accurate.


5 posted on 02/27/2008 7:12:04 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Just 22% believe the Times was simply reporting the news.

Probably closer to 10-12% that actually believe it. See my tagline.

6 posted on 02/27/2008 7:24:09 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
66% believe it was an attempt by the paper to hurt the McCain campaign

No shiite, Edison ... if it walks like a schumk, talks like a schmuck, acts like a schmuck, then its a schmuck. Nuff said.

7 posted on 02/27/2008 7:42:31 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

“All the News That’s Shit to Print”


8 posted on 02/27/2008 8:03:38 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Why don't they print this:

http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_more/obama.htm

Barak Obama is 50% Caucasian, 43.75% Arab, and only 6.25% Negro-African. He doesn't have the lawful 12.5% Negro-African to legally claim to be African-American. Barak Obama is ARAB-AMERICAN.

http://www.masnet.org/prof_personality.asp?id=1508 http://www.bufford.politicalgateway.com/main/columns/read.html?col=737 http://www.themidnightsun.org/?p=1613 http://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/080115/issues.html?.v=1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/08/wkenya308.xml http://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/02/barak-obama-questions-about-ethnic.html http://www.amconmag.com/2007/2007_03_12/feature.html http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon212.htm http://barackobamacandidate.org/ http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/3/28/142319.shtml

From an email from someone who returned to the States on Feb 11 this year: “We were asked everywhere about the Presidential race in America. There was great interest. The Jews came up to us and asked us many questions. They said they do not want the Clintons again. They warned us that Obama is a Muslim, not a Christian. In Egypt, the Arabs said the same thing to us; they said Obama is Muslim and they are amazed that Americans would consider electing a Muslim President of America!!”

9 posted on 02/27/2008 8:04:44 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Now that is funny!


10 posted on 02/27/2008 8:12:20 PM PST by JRochelle (Bill is defending Hillary because she is being beaten by a black guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

mark for later


11 posted on 02/28/2008 12:26:25 AM PST by dfwddr (McCain is the new Coke. I want the Classic -- Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jdm

12 posted on 02/28/2008 4:07:05 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson