Posted on 02/27/2008 5:56:01 PM PST by Sig Sauer P220
No!! That is not “natural-born” . That is imputed by statute not under the constitution. This man is history. On to Huckelberry.
Ok. Then show me how it differs from natural born as defined by the constitution.
Just “No” won’t cut it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.