Posted on 02/28/2008 7:19:12 PM PST by Kid Shelleen
---snip--- The other candidate, by contrast, is one of the Senate's fiercest partisans. This senator reflexively sides with the party's extreme wing. There's no record of working with the other side of the aisle. None ---snip--- Who would oppose a bill that said you couldn't kill a baby who was born? Not Kennedy, Boxer or Hillary Rodham Clinton. Not even the hard-core National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL). Obama, however, is another story. ---snip-- according to Obama, "they," babies who survive abortions or any other preterm newborns, should be permitted to be killed because giving legal protection to preterm newborns would have the effect of banning all abortions.
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
Have you heard Cardinal George of Chicago ever comment on Barrack’s abortion stance?
And McCnutts has no record of working with his own side of the aisle.
Regards
Repeat this loud and often. This man wants to KILL live babies OUTSIDE the womb. It is sicker than sick.
He keeps writing checks with his mouth that the Democrats can’t cash.
Will Santorum have to apologize for labelling Obama an ideologue? Does the fact that elephant was used in the headline indicate any subtle hostility that Republicans must apologize for?
Anyone who has no regaurd for infant’s “right to life,” will have the same disregard for anyone else’s “right to life.”
Are you saying you would choose the Blue Pill?
Sickening - Hope Mac has balls to Hammer him on this. That would cause some reasonable woment to run away from him.
If there ever was definition of murder, this is it.
I always thought the red vs. blue pill thing was a false choice. Either way you have to drink the Kool-Aid to wash it down.
My choice was neither. But then, I am definitely not THE ONE.
I know you posted part of this quote- but for anyone who won’t read the whole piece by Santorum- this deserves it’s own post. Obama stood on the floor of the Illinois Senate to defend this wickedness. Beyond belief. Truly.
~ snip~
How could someone possibly justify such a vote? In March 2001, Obama was the sole speaker in opposition to the bill on the floor of the Illinois Senate. He said: “We’re saying they are persons entitled to the kinds of protections provided to a child, a 9-month child delivered to term. I mean, it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal-protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child.” So according to Obama, “they,” babies who survive abortions or any other preterm newborns, should be permitted to be killed because giving legal protection to preterm newborns would have the effect of banning all abortions.
~snip~
Sorry, Rick. No matter what you say, you’re not going to be on the ticket.
This post (<-click) explains how dirty Democrat politics led to the USSC's scandalous legalization of abortion in Roe v. Wade, in my opinion. Note that the post first references two non-abortion cases to show Roe v. Wade in a different, troubling perspective.

Well, he makes it sound like he’s gonna be King of the World, but I’m pretty sure that we’re still a triune government and due process isn’t going away. Not in D.C.
He can say all the crap he wants, but like Pelosi, may not find the constituency necessary to make it happen.
I think he’s too vacant and dumb to really have a definable ideology. So, yeah he’s dangerous. But a loser in the end.
You cannot simultaneously believe children are a gift from God AND believe it's acceptable to kill that gift from God.
You can't. And he doesn't.
Obama-lama-ding-dong is a huge litmus test to see just how much America is going to bend over to "diversity", "racial harmony", or whatever the hell you want to call it. The years and years of multi-culti brainwashing are delivering.
We have become neutered on the alter of racial guilt. And the Muslims know it.
Pardon my language (already edited down from what I typed first), but that is friggin some sick shit. I'm pro-life - not extremist on the issue - but that there is so far beyond the realm of sanity that I cannot comprehend the mentality behind it. A CHILD BORN ALIVE CAN BE DIVORCED ENTIRELY OF THE "MOTHER", there can be no coherent argument leveled even in the name of "choice". As repulsive as the present justifications enshrining abortion as a "right" are, if they are endorsed, the extension of medical/parental sovereignty over the very life of the born child does not even make sense. This is almost to treat abortion as a sacrament, as some religious ritual which all have the "right" to partake in. There is no possible medical issue that they can pretend this is about. Another circle down the toilet bowl. Sickening.
So, what’s his holeiness plan to do with all the injured vets coming home then? They’re not the unborn, but they are cast down, and some, discouraged about what’s happened to them. Do they get sent down river with the rest of us....
Then again, we can beat the drum for New Orleans and claim our millions $$.
I for one am seething about the education sessions for those of us who would need re-education about helping out in the community for 1 month/year. Who has time with working over 40 hours, family, chores, house, etc.? He wants one month of community service from us, too, along with the .7% for the UN, $.30/gallon gas tax for whoknowswhat and Godonlyknowswhat for groceries, prescriptions, clothing, utilities, etc. You know. Luxuries.
/rant
The Elephant in the Room: Obama
- hey don’t talk about his ears. He doesn’t like it when you talk about his ears.
Add that to the list of things we aren’t supposed to talk about.
Like his middle name, HUSSEIN?
Obama is neither vacant nor dumb. He is very, very shrewd. He is playing the race issue brilliantly. One thing he clearly understands well is race in America (and even better, race in the democratic party).
In addition, he was a bit awkward in public initially, and he has proved himself to be a very fast learner at how to present himself on the stump.
He has probably knocked off Bill and Hill, and that is a huge victory for a relative neophyte. The two of them don't really know what hit them. Obama has them boxed in every which way; whatever they do to try to counter him rebounds to Hillary's disadvantage.
No, Obama is not dumb; he is brilliant, charming, possibly unscrupulous, and very dangerous.
He is possibly not unbeatable, but McCain ahd his advisors will have their work cut out for them in the general election. I hope they appreciate what they are up against (and I bet they do). Can he box McCain in the same way he has Hillary? With the steady help of the press, possibly he can. I hope not.
It is sick and disturbing. It's seems almost Islamic in its harshness.
bump
Agree. Look at the Lacy Peterson murder case. Scott Peterson was charged with two murders, because he also killed his unborn, but near full-term son, Conor.
I'm sure that the RNC had this figured out way before I did.
One thing he’s not is original, now that he’s getting questioned on substance, ( rather than feel good emotion ), all that’s coming out of his mouth is the standard 1970’s era left wing babble. “Class Warfare, go after the have's , Government will solve all your problems....yadda, yadda, yadda”. He is very beatable, and knocking off the Clintons was no great task, even the Dem’s are tired of their same ole, same ole.
My guess, Obama v McCain in November.....won’t even be close
“...I for one am seething about the education sessions for those of us who would need re-education about helping out in the community for 1 month/year.... He wants one month of community service from us...”
—
Are you speaking of the payback for college tuition here- or is this a different socialist plan I’ve not heard about yet?
Originally, the idea was from azconservative.com. It is only somewhat satirical.....
http://www.encore.org/news/top-stories/obama-expand-senior-volu
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/appealing_to_youth_obama_issue_1.html
It’s not just for young people, and it’s not just for the retired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.