Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Nader Factor
Townhall.com ^ | March 1, 2008 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 03/01/2008 4:24:28 AM PST by Kaslin

So Ralph Nader is running for president again, and there is no truth to the rumor that the nominating convention will be held in his garage. Too spacious.

With a few exceptions, the leftwing press were openly hostile to Nader's announcement this week, taking it very personally:

"(He) remains as obstinate, prickly and egotistical as ever," said the New Jersey Star-Ledger.

"Nader: Unsafe at Any Age," headlined the Louisville Courier-Journal.

And The Boston Globe, while saying Nader has a "right" to run, wrote: "Nader has come to believe in his own indispensability."

The left-leaning media are mad because they believe Nader cost Al Gore the election in 2000 by siphoning votes away from him in Florida. You may remember that old Ralph received 97,488 votes in the Sunshine State, and that President Bush defeated Vice President Gore by fewer than 1,000 ballots. Doing the math makes many liberals cry.

So Ralphie boy, as Ed Norton might put it, is not in real solid with the Democratic establishment these days.

Not that he cares. I've known Nader for decades, and he is a hard-core socialist, a man who fervently believes the government must control evil corporations, regulate wages and even set prices for what consumers buy. Nader has far more in common with Raul Castro than Howard Dean. He thinks the Dems are almost as bad as the Republicans when it comes to exploiting folks.

That's why Nader's presidential announcement was a one-day story. No New York Times profile for him, not this year. No NBC News feature story. Ralph Nader is going to be mighty lonely on the campaign trail because the far-left has abandoned him.

Feeling sorry for the guy, I called him a few days ago and asked him to appear on my syndicated radio program, heard on more than 400 stations. At first, Nader's "person" was excited. Free media! But a short time later she told us Ralph was "unavailable." Perhaps a conference call with Raul?

The reason, I believe, that Nader passed on the Radio Factor was that he knew I would poke a bit of fun at him. Let's face it, Jane Fonda has a better chance of winning the presidency than Ralph. But unlike the lefty media, I have no problem with Nader running. He entertains me. I never know what he's going to say or whom he's going to hammer. Give him points for that.

Next November, Ralph Nader will get less than 1 percent of the vote and won't even appear on most state ballots. Sadly for him, the Ralphster will not be a factor this time around. His time has passed, and his socialistic struggle is completely irrelevant.

But I still like Ralph Nader. Even if he is unavailable.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; nader; oreilly; thirdparty

1 posted on 03/01/2008 4:24:29 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t agree with the last sentence.”His socialistic struggle is completely irrelevant”. Were going to get a ‘socialist struggle’ with either Hussein or H. Clinton.


2 posted on 03/01/2008 4:46:33 AM PST by Carl LaFong (Building Code Under Fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Sadly for him, the Ralphster will not be a factor this time around. His time has passed, and his socialistic struggle is completely irrelevant.”

Nader’s “socialist struggle” is virtually identical to the positions taken by Obama and the Clintons. Nader is just one more socialist in the presidential race. The MSM is dismissive of Nader and says Nader is completely irrelevant because he will take away votes from the Democrats.


3 posted on 03/01/2008 4:55:55 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
they believe Nader cost Al Gore the election in 2000 by siphoning votes away

what goes around...

they believe Nader cost Al Gore the election in 2000 by siphoning votes away

really goes around. 8^) - Ross Perot.

4 posted on 03/01/2008 5:02:02 AM PST by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

With ralphie’s help we might actually keep caliph Barack Blessing ( Hussein means Blessing) Obama under 43%.
But we really don’t want ralph to run. His voters will vote rat while they are at the polls. If he is NOT in the race they will stay home.


5 posted on 03/01/2008 5:15:54 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There you are.....

If instead of Nader, it had been a center-right candidate for POTUS, that would siphon votes away from the GOP standard-bearer, the media would have been hailing it as the second coming.

6 posted on 03/01/2008 5:30:05 AM PST by Mr.Smorch (Baraq is the Arabic name of the winged horse that took mohammed to paradise from the DomeoftheRock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong
Were going to get a ‘socialist struggle’ with either Hussein or H. Clinton.

Or McCain.

I plan to vote for Nader. He allows me to not vote for McCain without voting for a muslim.

7 posted on 03/01/2008 6:08:24 AM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In this scenario, Ralph is significant:

Hillary steals the nomination.
Obama get’s Bloomberg backing and goes Independent.
General election is split nearly evenly at 32% for each of the major candidates and Ralph gets 4%.

Who benefits?


8 posted on 03/01/2008 6:14:05 AM PST by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Nader will get about seven votes nationally this time. The hard left nut cases will have their dream candidate as the Dem nominee.
9 posted on 03/01/2008 6:18:37 AM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonliberal

Were going to get a ‘socialist struggle’ with either Hussein or H. Clinton.

Or McCain.

I plan to vote for Nader. He allows me to not vote for McCain without voting for a muslim


Although I can not vote for Nader.....it is interesting that Nader could actually siphon votes from the liberal McCain...


10 posted on 03/01/2008 6:40:23 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Anyone Notice....But It Is Only The Low-Rated Talk Radio Hosts That Support McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The VW and Corvair killer rides again.


11 posted on 03/01/2008 7:22:12 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson