Posted on 03/01/2008 10:12:35 AM PST by K-oneTexas
Howard Dean & The 1850s: Convenient Racial Revisionism by Dr. Brian Melton
The unexamined life is not worth living. Socrates
Howard Dean has recently demonstrated conclusively that historical ignorance doesnt stop with teenage mall-rats and muscle-bound jocks. In fact, it runs all the way up into the very heart of the DNC. The good doctor (who hopefully knows more about his profession than he does about history) has made the claim that the Republican Party looks like the 1950s and talks like the 1850s. The 1950s aside, Dean, of course, is attempting to smear the Republicans as a party of racists who are defending systematic public discrimination. In this he displays a shocking lack of knowledge, not only of the Republicans, but also of the shameful history of his own party.
Most Liberals today loudly proclaim the Democrats to be the party of minorities and the Republicans to be the party of racist oppressors. Im reminded of a ridiculous comment from another less-than-aware Liberal icon, Bill Maher. Maher commented on one Republican national convention by saying that the last time the Republicans had that many black people on stage, they were selling them. Anyone Dean or Maher who can make such a statement with a straight face should be sent to a corner with a good, basic textbook (or at least should limit themselves to commentaries on the failures of the American educational system, of which they are manifestly victims
So, what do Republicans from the 1850s talk like?
...by the law of nature and of nations, the right of property in slaves falls to the ground; for one who is equal to another cannot be the owner or property of that other. William H. Seward
The white man's happiness cannot be purchased by the black man's misery. Frederick Douglas (technically joined in 1860)
Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally. Abraham Lincoln, a somewhat prominent antebellum Republican
The Republican Party in the 1850s was bound together by one thing: No further spread of slavery. I want to be careful not to fall into the same trap as Dean and Maher. The Republican Party was no pure haven of abolitionist idealism; there were quite a few racists in the GOP then. Still the plain fact is that it entered the American political arena dedicated to containing and then later eliminating one of the worst abominations ever inflicted by one American upon another. To quote Lincoln again they wanted to place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction. This dedication to slaverys destruction become more pronounced as time (and the Civil War) wore on. After the war, the Republican Party remained the party of choice for African Americans well into the 1900s.
As we see from above, the Republicans of 1850 were saying quite a bit of which we can today be proud. So to Governor Dean I say that his historically challenged statement must translate, on that point, into quite the compliment. And now for the Democrats. What did some Democrats from the 1850s have to say?
Military power should not be allowed to interfere with the relations of servitude, either by supporting or impairing the authority of the master... George B. McClellan, Milquetoast General and 1864 Democratic presidential candidate
They [Black men and women] had no rights which the white man was bound to respect. Justice Roger B. Taney in the Dredd Scott decision in 1857
[The right of slavery] was established by decree of Almighty God...it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts." Jefferson Davis, an often conveniently overlooked 1850s Democrat.
These are, of course, only the most obvious and easily available quotes. Though the Republicans in the 1850s had some serious disagreements amongst themselves about how opposed to slavery they should be, they at least were looking in the right direction. The Democrats, on the other hand, were more united. Dominated by a southern wing who promoted radically pro-slavery views and supported half-heartedly by swarms of spineless northern moderates, the Democrats were, without doubt, the party of slavery.
But little things like historical facts are hardly something to get in the way of people like Dean and Maher. In cases like this, they are manifestly more concerned with propaganda than they are with truth. Blatant falsehoods such as these (even accidental ones) serve a very practical purpose: They keep minorities chained to the Democrat bandwagon. They reinforce false stereotypes (i.e. Republican/conservative=racist) wielded in a campaign of blatant emotional manipulation, thereby encouraging minorities to support the Democrats out of some mythical historical principle and they therefore discourage minorities from asking the hard questions Democrat leaders fear most. The Republicans dont get a pass on those sorts of issues (nor should they); its time the Democrats faced them too. Frankly, minority voters deserve to be treated as much more than a sure-fire Democrat stepping stone.
Know thy enemy, know thyself. Apparently Howard Dean and Bill Maher know neither.
## Dr. Brian Melton is the author of Shermans Forgotten General and an Assistant Professor of History at Liberty University.
Howard Dean is a QUACK on more than one level.....
Dean thought the book of Job was in the New Testament. Pick a subject, any subject...
One problem I have in combating libs is trying to point out the republicans’ successes in civil rights, etc - only to have them tell me that “the republican party was different then, they were more like democrats”, etc. they ALWAYS try to change the definitions around.
the evil Republican Slave Holders were put down by that magnificent Democrat President Lincoln!
If it were'nt for that magnificent Democrat President Teddy Roosevelt we wouldn't have the National Parks System!
Yadda, Yadda, Deaniac!
Maher’s and Dean’s stupid and ignorant remarks show that the Moron Mentality, characteristic of the Democrat Party, is not confined to rank-and-file Democrats—the followers. The Party’s leaders and spokesmen display it too.
In the 1850’s, the Democrats were pushing for the preservation and expansion of black slavery.
The anti-slavery party was the Republican Party.
Sorry, Howie, you lose again.
Howie’s idea of good government is the Soviet Union circa 1980.
C’mon, everybody knows that the rats don’t need no steenkin’ facts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.