Posted on 03/02/2008 2:59:25 PM PST by Libloather
Putin, Medvedev pledge unified path
By JIM HEINTZ, Associated Press Writer
1 minute ago
MOSCOW - Dmitry Medvedev, the man Vladimir Putin hand-picked to be his successor, scored a crushing victory in Russia's presidential elections Sunday, a result that was long anticipated but that still raises questions about who will run this resurgent global power.
With ballots from over half of Russia's electoral precincts counted, Medvedev had 68.2 percent, according to the Central Election Commission. Communist Party chief Gennady Zyuganov had nearly 20 percent, it said.
Medvedev was on course to win about 70 percent of the vote, according to a poll by the All-Russia Opinion Research Center, or VTsIOM.
He is expected to rule in concert with his mentor, an arrangement that could see Putin calling the shots despite his constitutionally subordinate position as Russia's prime minister.
Medvedev, 42, the youngest Russian ruler since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, is expected to heed Putin's advice, continue his assertive course with the West, maintain state control over Russia's mineral riches and freeze out real opposition movements.
"We will increase stability, improve the quality of life and move forward on the path we have chosen," Medvedev said Sunday, appearing alongside Putin at a celebration at the Red Square outside the Kremlin. "We will be able to preserve the course of President Putin."
Putin said Medvedev "has taken a firm lead" and congratulated his protege.
"Such a victory carries a lot of obligations," Putin said. "This victory will serve as a guarantee that the course we have chosen, the successful course we have been following over the past eight years, will be continued."
Medvedev ran against three rivals apparently permitted on the ballot because of their loyalty to the Kremlin line. But the two candidates — Communist Party chief Gennady Zyuganov and ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky — still alleged violations after the voting ended.
Zyuganov said he would dispute the result, and Zhirinovsky threatened to do so as well, before backing down.
Some voters complained of pressure to cast ballots for Medvedev, and critics called the election a cynical stage show to ensure unbroken rule by Putin and his allies.
Sunday's vote came after a tightly controlled campaign and months of political maneuvering by Putin, who appeared determined to keep a strong hand on Russia's reins while maintaining while maintaining the basic trappings of electoral democracy and leaving the constitution intact.
Medvedev has said he would propose making Putin his prime minister, and Putin has said he would agree. But in Russia, the premier wields significantly less power than the president, and Putin may find his new chair narrow and confining.
After eight years in the international limelight, Putin also may miss the job of representing Russia in gatherings of world leaders.
The first test could be the July summit of Group of Eight leading industrialized nations: If Putin goes alone or accompanies Medvedev, that could signal his reluctance to relinquish control.
Russia had two rulers — a diarchy — in the 17th century, when the first Romanov czar, Mikhail, served along with his father, Patriarch Filaret. In the early 1920s, Josef Stalin briefly shared power with Vladimir Lenin, the Bolshevik leader and founder of the Soviet state.
The Putin-Medvedev tandem could encourage a revival of classic Kremlinology. During the Soviet era, Western experts painstakingly studied power shifts in the Kremlin by noting minute details of the public appearances of Communist Party leaders.
In particular, they looked for signs of tension or bad blood in body language, and of rising or falling influence based on where they stood on Lenin's Tomb during annual parades in Red Square.
Putin has already shown signs of discomfort with his new role as subordinate to his protege.
When a reporter at his last news conference in February asked him whether he would put the new president's portrait on his office wall, Putin answered dryly that he doesn't need to make such displays of loyalty.
Some officials who know Medvedev say privately that he is tougher than his appearance and demeanor may suggest and could show more resolve after his inauguration.
Medvedev has taken a liberal and pro-business posture during the campaign, avoiding Putin's harsh anti-Western rhetoric. But critics point that he helped engineer Putin's crackdown on political and media freedoms as one-time Kremlin chief of staff.
He also spearheaded the Kremlin's concept of making Russia an "energy superpower" as chairman of Gazprom state gas monopoly, strong-arming former Soviet neighbors and expanding Russia's control of Europe's energy supplies. Medvedev's landslide victory would give him the stature to defy Putin, in case of any potential rift with his mentor.
While most expect Medvedev to play second fiddle to Putin, the vast powers of the Russian presidency may tempt him to step out of his mentor's shadow.
Russian history shows that rulers often like to get rid of those who backed their ascent to power. Boris Berezovsky, who backed Putin's rise to power, fled abroad to escape money-laundering charges several months after his election.
Medvedev is the first Russian leader to succeed his predecessor according to a constitutional timetable; Putin became acting president first after Russia's first President Boris Yeltsin stepped down early, and only later won election.
But Medvedev's election was not a wide-open contest either.
Liberal opposition leaders Garry Kasparov and Mikhail Kasyanov were barred from running on technicalities, and voters across Russia say they were being urged, cajoled and pressured to vote in an effort to ensure that Medvedev scored a major victory.
Kasparov held his own protest against the election Sunday near Red Square. Escorted by a dozen riot police, he carried a plastic shopping bag that read: "I am not participating in this farce."
Polling stations offered enticements to voters: discounted food, office supplies, tickets to concerts. The enticements echoed the practices of the Soviet era, when hard-to-get items were available during carefully staged elections.
In a post-Soviet touch, some polling stations were set up in shopping malls.
The head of an independent Russian election monitoring group, Golos, said her organization was receiving a steady stream of complaints and reports of irregularities, including blatant attempts to influence voters and voters being "bought off."
"Most of problems appear to be occurring at the local level" in the provinces, where there is little scrutiny, Liliya Shabanova said.
Sofia, 25, a history teacher in a school in southwestern Moscow, said the principal required her and her colleagues to cast ballots at a polling station at the school.
"This is terrible; they are not leaving us any choice," said Sofia, who declined to give her last name out of fear of losing her job. She said she destroyed her ballot in protest.
Timofei Ryumin, 38, a doctor who lives in Russia's westernmost region, the Baltic city of Kaliningrad, said Medvedev's campaign seems "planned and coherent" and voted for him despite disappointment in the Kremlin's unfulfilled promises to provide cheaper housing for families like his.
"I don't see alternative leaders who could hold a firm grip on power," he said.
___
Associated Press writers Mansur Mirovalev, Maria Danilova and Peter Leonard contributed to this report.
Sounds familiar...
Obama just can’t wait to meet him.
This is Russia, Hello?
What’s the motivation for putting on a show? This is the ultimate fake election and the whole world knows it. Maybe the Russian people are not aware of it.
However, TIME magazine did a great article when they picked Putin to be the Man of the Year (I am surprised how Hillary and Obama are running for President but don’t bother to pick up even a copy of TIME magazine. They would have knocked the question out of the Ballpark, instead of looking like wimps).
Either way according to that article, nobody even in Russia is fooled.
So this seems to be a whole lot of effort to try and fool people when really no one is.
Why do you intimate that?
He won by a LARGE margin. Were people forced to vote for him?
Looks like he was elected...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Why do you intimate that?
Didn't the Hildabeast win an entire district, on her first Senate run, with 100% going in her favor? I demand a recount.
Having spent the week in Moscow, I can tell you that no one really talked politics, most people like things just fine the way they are now, as opposed to the gangsterism of the 90's, and Putin is seen as "necessarily strong".
Russia needed a cop after Yeltsin. They got one. Now they just hope that they can graaaaadually move into something resembling a real democracy. But first, the thugs had to go, i.e. the Oligarchs and their enforcers. Largely, they are gone. At least in public.
But they'll let Medvedev/Putin and United Russia get away with a whole lot as long as life continues to get better, which it is. At least for a large number of people.
The writer has no knowledge of history. During the last few years of Lenin's life, Staling was just one of perhaps a half dozen leading Bolsheviks. It took him a number of years after Lenin died to become el supremo.
Yep. Selected; not elected here in America and that’s on both sides.
Actually, one of the things people find a bit threatening is the existence of the state sponsored "youth movement", Nashi, which is half summer camp, half Putin/United Russia indoctrination camp. While not as overt as the Nuremburg Party rallies, they do feature large portraits of Our Heroes Putin and Medvedev, but seem longer on Russian rock bands and rah-rah happy talk than about politics.
Of course, if you watch a Nashi camp video, you might be inspired to attend, considering the number of hot, young Russian women, but er, um, I digress....!
It’s all Chinese to me now ;-)
In truth, an act of bravery by Sophia.
As for Medvedev's announcement that 'together' we will win; he must have been referencing Putin; not the Russian citizens; who had no choice in the matter.
With or without them; Medvedev would win; but it does look better to the world community-at-largethat a healthy percentage of the populace votes. And there are so many ways that they are so 'encouraged'.
There can be no question of 'choice'. . .as Medvedev offered wisdom on another day; that elections were 'threat to stability' in Russia. There should be no doubts here as to the fraud of this election.
Their motivation, I think, is to save their enlightened, European and 'Democratic Face' that they wear before the 'world community'.
And of course, the citizens and the citizen 'voters' are all to aware of the hopeless slippery slope they are being dragged to. . .thrown over and/or pushed down. . .as Putin atempts restoration of an older and more evil, Russia.
Not much appetite when you see tongues being cut off (figuratively and literally. . .)of those who say they are hungry for real and honest change and attempt such in Russia today - as we speak.
Would recommend to all who are interested in the fearsome degradation and upsurge of a genuine evil that is gripping Russia under Putin to read, A Russian Diary by Anna Politkovskaya ) the Russian journalist who spoke and wrote, truthfully; and so was an enemy of Putin and consequently was murdered as she returned home from work not too long ago.
No, this book did not make the 'Staff Recommendations' at Barnes & Noble; and doubt it it was ever featured in 'new non-fiction' when it came out. But, it can be ordered; and certainly located on Amazon. . .surely(!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.