Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hedge fund Focus collapses
FT ^ | 03/05/08 | James Mackintosh

Posted on 03/05/2008 5:08:31 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Hedge fund Focus collapses

By James Mackintosh in London

Published: March 5 2008 02:00 | Last updated: March 5 2008 02:00

Focus Capital, a $1bn New York hedge fund, has been forced to liquidate its entire portfolio after missing margin calls from banks, it told investors yesterday.

The fund, which had produced strong returns by investing in Swiss mid-cap stocks since starting in 2005, is now expected to shut down after losing about 80 per cent of its value.

The collapse is the latest to hit leveraged hedge funds, following the failure of Peloton Partners' $2bn ABS fund last week, and comes as worries are rising that forced sales by hedge funds could drive down prices.

Several other funds specialising in credit are close to crisis, according to investors and consultants, while a few smaller funds have had assets seized by banks or required rescues by investors or allies.

In a letter to investors, the founders of Focus, Tim O'Brien and Philippe Bubb, said it had been hit by "violent short-selling by other market participants", which accelerated when rumours that it was in trouble circulated.

Sharp drops in the value of its investments led its two main banks forcing it to sell last Tuesday, according to the letter to investors.

Several Swiss stocks in which Focus invested plummeted when it sold big stakes last week, including white goods maker Schult-hess Group, in which it held 30 per cent, and food company Hiestand Holding, where it had 32 per cent.

Focus declined to comment on the level of leverage it used, but confirmed it had sold its portfolio after being hit by the plummeting value of its investments.

"It was like an avalanche," a spokesman said. He said the fund started February with just over $1bn under management.

Yesterday, P-Solve Niche Opportunities Fund, a listed London fund, said it had written down its investment to zero, knocking 7.6 per cent off its own asset value.

Focus denied it had lost all investor money, but refused to say how badly it had been hit.

According to hedge fund databases, Focus dropped 8.6 per cent in January in its euro share class, following gains of 33 per cent last year and 112 per cent the year before.

Many other hedge funds investing in illiquid assets, mostly in the credit markets, have suspended redemptions by investors to avoid forced sales. But concerns remain that withdrawals by investors from certain sectors could force more to shut.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: collapse; focus; hedgefund; margincall

1 posted on 03/05/2008 5:08:32 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg

Ping!


2 posted on 03/05/2008 5:09:03 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Not much of a “hedge” were they?..............


3 posted on 03/05/2008 5:11:44 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

loss of focus


4 posted on 03/05/2008 5:12:33 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Sharks eating their own.


5 posted on 03/05/2008 5:15:50 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Short-sellers = hedge clippers.


6 posted on 03/05/2008 5:16:40 AM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Will this affect Chelsea Clinton’s year-end bonus?


7 posted on 03/05/2008 5:19:06 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yawn, so another union pension fund or a movie star takes a hit. Who cares?


8 posted on 03/05/2008 5:19:12 AM PST by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
She can always count on James Riady, if her current job does not fare well.
9 posted on 03/05/2008 5:21:03 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

...Or a 401k, or IRA, or KEOGH plan. I CARE! My 401k has been losing money................................


10 posted on 03/05/2008 5:21:03 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hedge Funds - the casinos of Wall Street

sometime you win - some lose!!


11 posted on 03/05/2008 5:22:26 AM PST by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Were a hedge against having to pay capital gains taxes


12 posted on 03/05/2008 5:24:46 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

And this is the so-called “smart” money.


13 posted on 03/05/2008 5:25:30 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Truth : Liberals :: Kryptonite : Superman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

Re post 8, exactly.


14 posted on 03/05/2008 5:32:06 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If only the evil Soros could get caught.


15 posted on 03/05/2008 5:38:12 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Somebody please tell Soros is broke. I hate to be so mean, but I would really get a kick out of that. Sorry


16 posted on 03/05/2008 5:38:27 AM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

No. They’ll take up a collection amongst the Chinese bus boys.


17 posted on 03/05/2008 5:46:34 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Please note how hedge fund problems began. Multi-billionaires had a hedge fund to guarantee not just that their assets were protected, but to make them enormous amounts of money through leverage. It was called Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM).

Alan Greenspan described LTCM’s clients as “a small number of highly sophisticated, very wealthy individuals” who had tried to get high rates of return.

At the beginning of 1998, the firm had equity of $4.72 billion and had borrowed over $124.5 billion with assets of around $129 billion. It had off-balance sheet derivative positions with a notional value of approximately $1.25 trillion.

(In personal terms, let’s say you had $10,000 in collateral, yet the bank gave you a $263,000 loan based on this collateral. Then with this money, you purchased $2.55 million dollars in stock, on margin. Great deal, if you can get it at those ratios.)

At its height, it was giving these “highly sophisticated, very wealthy individuals”, annual returns of 40% on their investments.

But the hedge fund collapsed. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York arranged a bailout by its creditors, and because the bail out was barely successful, an interesting thing happened.

Suddenly hedge funds started to be created everywhere.

Investors saw only two things. A 40% return, and the unwillingness of the government, in this case Alan Greenspan, to allow “hedge funds” to collapse. Nothing quite like expecting free government insurance on your investment, is there?

The problem with this entire theory is that most of the hedge funds out there today neither produce the huge returns, nor will produce the slightest concern if they fail, except from their investors. “a large number of highly foolish, if not so wealthy individuals”.


18 posted on 03/05/2008 5:50:05 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
No damage to the market?
19 posted on 03/05/2008 5:57:00 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Will this affect Chelsea Clinton’s year-end bonus?

Huge year end bonus if Hillary is elected. Kicked to the curb if Hillary isn't.

20 posted on 03/05/2008 6:24:32 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I wonder if they will be able to claw back any of the fat bonuses they paid out over the past few years...


21 posted on 03/05/2008 6:45:34 AM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Thank you for the explanation. Some of these complicated schemes are tough for us non-green eyeshade guys to figure out.


22 posted on 03/05/2008 6:48:42 AM PST by Dogrobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Your 401k was invested in hedge funds?
23 posted on 03/05/2008 6:55:07 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Sub-primes, apparently........


24 posted on 03/05/2008 6:57:08 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Investors saw only two things. A 40% return, and the unwillingness of the government, in this case Alan Greenspan, to allow “hedge funds” to collapse.

But the hedge fund was allowed to collapse. The investors lost all their money. Hedge funds disappear all the time.

25 posted on 03/05/2008 7:01:05 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Your 401k held sub-prime mortgages? How did you do that?
26 posted on 03/05/2008 7:01:45 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I didn’t. Apparently the various funds and such that my 401k was invested in were.....................


27 posted on 03/05/2008 7:16:45 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Mutual funds are different than hedge funds.


28 posted on 03/05/2008 7:23:44 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

That’s gonna leave a mark.


29 posted on 03/05/2008 7:25:23 AM PST by Centurion2000 (su - | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Yeah, They don’t lose money as fast..........


30 posted on 03/05/2008 8:24:02 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Very good summary. Thanks


31 posted on 03/05/2008 8:27:03 AM PST by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Too many longs and not enough shorts!


32 posted on 03/05/2008 8:37:57 AM PST by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hedge Funds are no different than going to Nevada and gambling on Texas-Hold’em.

It was a true house of cards from the gitgo.


33 posted on 03/05/2008 9:03:05 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogrobber

Think in terms of the Pyramid schemes of the 80’s.

The new $$$ was creating the payouts for the old entries to the pyramids.


34 posted on 03/05/2008 9:05:15 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL - owning 32% of a company is an investment not a hedge. They could have shorted their own stock, at least then they’d be even lol...


35 posted on 03/05/2008 9:46:09 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Nope, but hedge funds have become, for the most part, unregulated mutual funds for the rich.


36 posted on 03/05/2008 9:50:38 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Didnt you just have a conversation with a certain someone that thinks he knows everything financial and he was laughing at you calling you stupid all the while saying hedge funds and such dont hurt anyone but the two people involved?


37 posted on 03/05/2008 9:53:54 AM PST by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You all have left out the best part of Hedge Funds, the people who run them get 20% of any profits along with a big fee to run them.

So what if the funds fail and collapse. The folks who ran them made a fortune. It’s sooooo easy to fleece the rich, just convince them you can make them MORE money.

Toooooo funnnny!


38 posted on 03/05/2008 10:03:51 AM PST by OhhTee5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
hedge funds have become, for the most part, unregulated mutual funds for the rich.

No "for the most part" about it. These vehicles are not offered to the public and are limited to "accredited investors" as defined by SEC Rule 501(d), although 35 "non-accredited investors" can invest in it without the hedge fund busting its exemption from SEC registration.

Red Badger, don't take this personally, cuz as of now, I am in the same boat, but if you are concerned about the losses in you 401(k), you are not rich enough to have money tied up in these things. Some pension funds or QUIBs (Qualified Institutional Buyers) can put money in these things, but usually have a cap of 5 - 10% "speculative" investments as fiduciary policy. Theorectically, you might be impacted by 1 or 2% in your 401(k), but I doubt it.

Frankly, the only things reliably making a profit the last few months have been commodities, foreign currency, govies, and shorts/puts. Real Estate, stocks, and non-govie bonds have been losers for the last few months.

39 posted on 03/05/2008 10:24:10 AM PST by L,TOWM (Liberals, The Other White Meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“At this juncture . . . the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime markets seems likely to be contained,” Bernanke said in prepared testimony to Congress’ Joint Economic Committee.


40 posted on 03/05/2008 5:11:57 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson