Posted on 03/06/2008 10:27:33 AM PST by gandalftb
Thanks. That’s what I expected.
Taxpayers be damned.
Rumor has it that Murtha put this deal together—he’s real tight with the President of Colt Arms, who has the contract.
THIS contract is going to Colt.
My local dealer cannot get 500 or 1000 round quantities of .223, and what he gets he sells for 50 cents/round!
Factories are 24x7 and still running short.
This is a nice vote of confidence for the Iraqi Army. I hope they treat it that way. It will be interesting if Iraq and Turkey really go at it in the future.
IS the next step selling them Apaches and Blackhawks, or are we already doing that?
Catches then have so much tension that the magazine fails to push past and fully seat. Normally not a problem as the magazine is gripped tightly anyway.
What happens is on three shot burst, the magazine eventually slightly dislodges and a round fails to chamber.
When changing magazines quickly, this is a common problem.
Also, I found out in very dry, dusty climates, solvent clean and allow to fully dry with no residue, then use only a dry lube, like Action Magic. The talcum sand of Iraq won't stick to it.
If you do a good job of setting up your weapon, you can run 500+ rounds without a jam or misfire.
It is critical to keep the ejection port cover closed at all times and the muzzle capped, bag your barrel.
I have minimal misfires and jams and only after excessive use. The M-16 is a terrific weapon, I will choose it in a fight anytime over an AK.
Thanks for all the great info gang! This turned into a great thread.
China is interested in China. All depends on whether we can offer them a better deal than the nasty little revolutionary band that wants to buy the ammo.
Even if they sometimes behave like Ferengi, the Chinese are rarely confused about what side their bread is buttered on.
M4 carbines with M203 grenade launchers and SAW’s are practical choices for any modern army. Add a designated marksman’s scoped flattop heavy barrel with bi-pod and ya have a pretty good general issue in one caliber with 40mm HEDP added as well.
I do love the AK with the BG15 30mm grenade launcher and SVD/FPK series of sniper rifles as well. Yet the modernization of the US primary infantry tools wins IMO.
Hey Dillion !
Please make a smaller M134DT in 5.56mm.......:o)
Wish list ...........make every thing in the 5.56mm caliber into 6.5 grendel including a minigun !
First, we roll into Iraq -- and promptly liberate massive quantities of new AK47s and cases of ammo.
We then make great photo opportunities by laying the rifles out in the road and driving tanks over them, and heaping the ammo up in huge stacks of cases and blowing it up real good.
Then, we spend millions of dollars to replace the rifles and ammo, paying the red Chinese military for more AK47s and ammo: U.S. buys weapons from Poly-Technologies of China. (Curiously, this news used to be widely available, but it seems to have evaporated off the Internet. This is the only extant copy I am still able to find. Even stuff indexed on archive.org comes up with "Failed Connection"!)
Finally, we get rid of those rifles and ammo, and toss even more millions at M16s and ammo.
Did I miss anything?
Nope, didn't think so.
I guess all I really want to know is who is either stupid as hell, or, getting really fat in the ol' wallet off this sequence of "deals"...
Subject: U.S. Troops PREFER AK-47s - >Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:05:12 -0600 > >Middle East - AP >U.S. Troops Use Confiscated Iraqi AK-47s >Sun Aug 24, 2:15 PM ET > >By ANDREW ENGLAND, Associated Press Writer > >BAQOUBA, Iraq - An American soldier stands at the side of an Iraqi highway, >puts his AK-47 on fully automatic and pulls the trigger. > >Within seconds the assault rifle has blasted out 30 rounds. Puffs of dust >dance in the air as the bullets smack into the scrubland dirt. Test fire >complete. > >U.S. troops in Iraq (news - web sites) may not have found weapons of mass >destruction, but they're certainly getting their hands on the country's >stock of Kalashnikovs - and, they say, they need them. > >"We just do not have enough rifles to equip all of our soldiers. So in >certain circumstances we allow soldiers to have an AK-47. They have to >demonstrate some proficiency with the weapon ... demonstrate an ability to >use it," said Lt. Col. Mark Young, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 67th >Armor Regiment, 4th Infantry Division. > >In Humvees, on tanks - but never openly on base - U.S. soldiers are >carrying the Cold War-era weapon, first developed in the Soviet Union but >now mass produced around the world. > >The AK is favored by many of the world's fighters, from child soldiers in >Africa to rebel movements around the world, because it is light, durable >and known to jam less frequently. > >Now U.S. troops who have picked up AKs on raids or confiscated them at >checkpoints are putting the rifles to use - and they like what they see. > >Some complain that standard U.S. military M16 and M4 rifles jam too easily >in Iraq's dusty environment. Many say the AK has better "knockdown" power >and can kill with fewer shots. > >"The kind of war we are in now ... you want to be able to stop the enemy >quick," said Sgt. 1st Class Tracy S. McCarson of Newport News, Va., an army >scout, who carries an AK in his Humvee. > >Some troops say the AK is easier to maintain and a better close-quarters >weapon. Also, it has "some psychological affect on the enemy when you fire >back on them with their own weapons," McCarson said. > >Most U.S. soldiers agree the M16 and the M4 - a newer, shorter version of >the M16 that has been used by American troops since the 1960s - is better >for long distance, precision shooting. > >Two weeks ago, Sgt. Sam Bailey of Cedar Falls, Iowa, was in a Humvee when a >patrol came under rocket-propelled grenade and heavy machine gun fire. It >was dark, the road narrow. On one side, there was a mud wall and palms >trees, on the other a canal surrounded by tall grass. > >Bailey, who couldn't see who was firing, had an AK-47 on his lap and his M4 >up front. The choice was simple. > >"I put the AK on auto and started spraying," Bailey said. > >Some soldiers also say it's easier to get ammo for the AK - they can pick >it up on any raid or from any confiscated weapon. > >"It's plentiful," said Sgt. Eric Harmon, a tanker who has a full 75-round >drum, five 30-round magazines, plus 200-300 rounds in boxes for his AK. He >has about 120 rounds for his M16. > >Young doesn't carry an AK but has fired one. He's considered banning his >troops from carrying AKs, but hasn't yet because "if I take the AK away >from some of the soldiers, then they will not have a rifle to carry with >them." > >Staff Sgt. Michael Perez, a tanker, said he would take anything over his >standard issue 9mm pistol when he's out of his tank. > >And the AK's durability has impressed him. > >"They say you can probably drop this in the water and leave it overnight, >pull it out in the morning, put in a magazine and it will work," Perez >said.
Fools.
Since I live in California and am therefore not to be trusted with an AK, bringing down the price of ammo would be about the only way this would help me.
I would take it, though.
Michael Frazier
I think you mean; "The M16 is a great weapon" :-) /s
I never had a serious problem with any M16A1 or M16A2 that I was issued in the 1980s. I own two AR15s and find them to be reliable and accurate.
I have never been in combat, so I can’t say that I have personal experience in the M16’s performance under such conditions.
I have great respect for the AK47. But it too is not perfect. It’s sights are crude and it doesn’t have great inherent accuracy, especially compared to the M16. I suspect that the AK47 is more reliable than the M16, but I believe that there are a lot of myths out there surrounding the AK47, namely that it NEVER jams and hardly ever has to be cleaned or lubricated, just as most of the stories of the M16 being completely unreliable are either urban legends or left over from the days before the M16A1 corrected many flaws in the M16 design and the powder in the 5.56mm round was corrected.
Any weapon that is not properly maintained will eventually fail. It sounds like the Iraqi AK47s were put through hard use over a long period of time with poor maintenance and their examples probably do have reliability problems relative to the newer M4s and M16A4s that the US military has in Iraq.
As for the 5.56mm round, I am not a fan. The 7.62 X 39 round of the AK47 is surely superior, but not decisively so. After all, the Russians switched to the 5.45mm AK74...
I think that the recent problems with stopping power associated with the 5.56mm round stem from the switch from the inherently unstable M193 55gr round to the stabilized M855 62gr round. For increased accuracy and penetration, we lost the tendency of the round to tumble inside the human body, which caused massive wounds.
I believe that the 7.62 X 51 NATO round is superior in most respects to both the 5.56 and 7.62 X 39.
I also disagree that the AK47 was THE premiere military rifle innovation of the 20th Century. I believe that distinction should go to the Garand action, originated in the M1 and then evolved into the M14. That gas operated, rotating bolt action has no weaknesses and the weapons that use it were the best in the world at the time they were fielded. They have tremendous range, accuracy, firepower, reliability and robustness.
In my opinion, it was a shame that the M14 family was not developed and evolved more. To me that is the ultimate rifle for most combat scenarios and the same basic platform can serve as a 1000 yard sniper rifle or a 16-inch barreled carbine for urban combat—and everything in between.
To me, Garand’s design was the most innovative, revolutionary and successful design of the post-WW1 era.
Just one guy’s opinion.
Horse---t! My MAK-90 has never -- NEVER -- failed to function, even when I'm not as good about cleaning it as I should. My experience with the "mouse gun" is that if you don't clean the hell out of it you'll start getting malfunctions even after a couple hundred rounds. I wouldn't want to engage targets beyond about 250 yards with either (even though I qualified Expert on both the 16A1 and A2)...I'll leave that to my L1A1.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Good comments, I agree completely with you on the Garand, it won WWII with its rate of fire and 30.06 round, just that nasty ching when the ammo clip popped out. Japanese and Germans never matched us until the Sturmgewehr.
I hear the ATF jokers has stopped all imports of those as well (sigh).
So much for having a Republican President.....
The M-14 was underrated and never got the opportunity to evolve, like the M16 did. Had the M-14 gone through the design evolution that the M16 experienced, who knows what would have transpired. The M-14, incidentally, did away with the M-1 Garand “ping” due to its detachable box magazine.
Something else that never gets mentioned: The Israeli Defense Forces replaced their domestically manufactured Galil, which has the Kalashnivov action, with the M-16. AK fans claim the decision was purely economic, but I remember reading that the IDF put the two rifles through head to head tests and found the M-16 to be more desirable. They had no problem with its reliability evidently.
Incidentally, my admiration for the M-16 does not extend to the M-4 Carbine, which, from all accounts, has reliability problems stemming from its short barrel, which causes the gas system problems. I think the M-4 is a mistake.
Iraq was a high risk, and hopefully high reward (less terrorism, eventually cheaper oil, stability in a volatile region, some financial payback from Iraq to help with the financial treasure lost -->hey, Rome required taxes).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.