Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan from Florida; Goodgirlinred; Miss Behave; cyn; AlwaysFree; amdgmary; angelwings49; ...
She kept her promise and Mikey kept his.


She never broke her promise.

Kaye O'Bara, who pledged to never leave her then-teenage daughter's side as the girl slipped into a diabetic coma 38 years ago, died at her Miami Gardens home this week -- in the same room she shared with her child, Edwarda, since 1970.

O'Bara, 80, died in her sleep. She had suffered for years from a cardiac illness that dated back to a heart attack in the early 1980s, said her niece Pamela Burdgick.


''I always wondered why she kept it up, and one time I asked her that question,'' said Ferguson, a sports copy editor at The Miami Herald.

''She told me she saw this as a sacrifice that was worth it, and that she would always be there for Edwarda,'' he said. ``She kept her promise to the end.''................

Mom who cared for comatose daughter for 38 years dies


26 posted on 03/08/2008 3:47:43 AM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: All
In contrast,the goals of the death enthusiasts are illustrated.


The release of Robert Latimer is one of those events that illustrate the tension between justice and mercy, a tension that in Catholic teaching places a higher emphasis on mercy than on justice.

Yet the Latimer case strains that emphasis on mercy for several reasons, the first being that the Saskatchewan farmer remains unrepentant for what he did.

Latimer killed his disabled daughter Tracy, who was born with cerebral palsy and at the age of 12 couldn't talk or walk and had the mental ability of an infant.


Instead of 25 years, he got 10. Now, after seven, he's getting out, still unrepentant, and his supporters still maintaining he got a raw deal as they fight for an overturning of his sentence.

This is mercy carried to absurd lengths, in complete disregard to the many other Tracy Latimers in this country who become more vulnerable with each development in the doctrine of mercy run wild


Those who favour mercy assume that Robert Latimer is the only person worthy of consideration, yet mercy, solely directed toward Latimer, necessarily entails diverting it from the disabled, whom this case leaves in a more precarious position.

Just as the deliberate killing of Terri Schiavo in the U.S. has eased public opposition to "mercy starvation," one senses that there will be broader tolerance the next time someone in Canada "mercifully ends the life" of a loved one they felt didn't have a life worth living.

In effect, decisions such as this one are helping to cement in place a new two-tier legal system: one for people who are disabled and don't benefit from the full extent of the law, and one for those who aren't.

Holding Latimer to the original sentence would have done a better job of sending the message that all Canadians' lives are worth protecting, including those of the disabled.

In the end, between justice and mercy, it's pretty clear which one is losing out.

Mercy run wild


27 posted on 03/08/2008 3:55:55 AM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: 8mmMauser

What a beautiful story!! Were it not for the murderous
Michael Schiavo, Terri’s parents would be caring for
and loving her in the same fashion, I’m certain!!


30 posted on 03/08/2008 10:32:56 AM PST by Lesforlife ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson