Posted on 03/07/2008 10:54:47 AM PST by day10
HILLSBORO — A former substitute teacher in the Dunklin School District in Jefferson County will be sentenced next month after pleading guilty of having sex with a 14-year-old student. Teresa Engelbach, 22, of Pevely, pleaded guilty last week to one felony count of second-degree statutory rape and one misdemeanor count of sexual misconduct. She could get up to 7 years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000 on the rape charge, and up to 6 months in prison and a fine of up to $500 on the sexual misconduct charge. Jefferson County Circuit Judge M. Edward Williams set sentencing for April 15. The charges against Engelbach were filed last March after the student, then in the eighth grade, reported to a teacher that he had had sex with Engelbach, a substitute teacher at Senn-Thomas Middle School in Herculaneum. The teacher told school administrators, who called police. The incidents took place last year between Feb. 1 and March 13 in several areas of Jefferson County and did not involve other students, police said. Engelbach had a substitute teaching certificate from the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, which requires a fingerprint background check through the Missouri Highway Patrol and FBI. Those checks came back clear, Dunklin Superintendent Stan Stratton has said. Stratton said Wednesday that Engelbach had not taught in the district since she was charged. Her attorney, Daris Almond Jr., was unavailable Wednesday for comment. Stratton said Engelbach also formerly taught at the district's high school and elementary school. She began working for the district, which has 1,350 students, in September 2006. Jim Morris, a spokesman for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, said Engelbach did not renew her substitute teaching certificate for the 2007-2008 school year.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
Ping
Not guilty.
Not Guilty, your Honor!
SOOOO not guilty.
It’s wrong on every level, but if this was a man, he would be looking at 20 years.
If the Catholic Priest fiasco is any guide shouldn’t this school district be sued into oblivion?
The student was another gal, I reckon.
“The charges against Engelbach were filed last March after the student, then in the eighth grade, reported to a teacher that he had had sex with Engelbach...”
I guess she wasnt very good. Not guilty however.
Don't think she will ever have one of those again.
Hmmm. It could go either way; we need more evidence before guilt can be determined properly. I’m leaning towards not guilty, though.
Not guilty.
I can’t be the first to say the usual cliche’, “Where the teachers like that when I was a horny young student?”
All these teachers having sex with thier young students sends out a disturbing message: Young boys are better than the metrosexual (i.e. sissified) men they normally would hang out with.
From a woman’s perspective, she looks rather mannish. However, as a straight female, I am automatically struck from this jury.
I’d rather tap Chelsea than tap that. She looks kind of like a guy to me.
"...reported to a teacher that he had had sex with Engelbach,"
Thank you! You beat me by six seconds with that remark, but yes, I’m a guy and she looks rather masculine to my eye.
You need to tap the brakes. Chelsea? Seriously?
Well that settles that. You would have to be crazy to become a teacher.
Hell yeah!
Not guilty.
Have you seen the recent photos of her? Have no idea what she looks like in person, but from recent photos, I’d hit it!
No, that’s another one. Not Debra LaFave, but that one is even better than Debra. I’m not sure what her name is, though.
Definitely NOT a guy.
Seven of Nine?
That looks a lot like the patron saint of Naughty Teachers, and inspiration for these FR posts and jury decisions, Debra LaFave.
Whoa! Not guilty AND gets a settlement from the DA’s office for false arrest and harassment!
Even not guiltier.
“From a woman’s perspective, she looks rather mannish.”
Now that you mention it, is that an Adam’s apple?
Six of one?
Not guilty...but not her.
Nah. She's just happy to see me.
If convicted, lock her up and throw away the key.
As a VERY straight male I look at the picture and think, “This woman should not have difficulty with men her age.” It just mystifies me why an adult, though I guess she is young at 22, would chance throwing everything away like this.
I don’t get it.
I had fantasies about one of my teachers (or more) so I can understand being seduced by a young attractive teacher. But having been seduced what would make you want to stop.
Guilt maybe?
Well, there are a lot of people here that wish they did.
Don’t count on it..
Do you remember when we met
That's the day I knew you were my pet
I want to tell you how much I love you
Come with me, my love
To the sea, the sea of love
I want to tell you how much I love you
Come with me, to the sea
Do you remember when we met
That's the day I knew you were my pet
I want to tell you how much I love you
GUITAR SOLO
Come with me, to the sea
Come with me, my love
To the sea, the sea of love
I want to tell you how much I love you
Come with me, to the sea
Ha ha!
7 of 9 was the character played by Jeri Ryan on Star Trek: Voyager.
Pure hotness there.
I’m assuming you find prominent Adam’s apples in women appealing?
The chorus of "not guilty's" is (for the most part) poking fun at the justice system that seems to sentence these offenders inversely proportional to their attractiveness. It's not intended (by most) to offer their opinion as to how the case should be adjudicated.
I guess he just couldn't help bragging to someone, but a teacher? Sheesh!
Seven of Nine?
Six of one?
Two of 38.
True!!!!
Not guilty, and the kids is a ‘tard for blabbing. Just enjoy the ride son.
Norah O'Donnell:
Also, not guilty.
Hey,there is Equal Rights and then there is Womans Rights!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.