Skip to comments.GAO: DOD lacks evidence for exemptions
Posted on 03/07/2008 2:46:59 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon hasn't made the case for exemptions from three environmental laws or provided examples of how military operations have been impeded by them, a congressional report said Friday.
The Government Accountability Office report came after the Navy lost in court over training exercises it was conducting under an exemption to the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Environmentalists contended that the Navy's use of sonar could harm whales off the Southern California coast, and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled March 2 that the Navy had to limit the sonar use.
In a written response included in the GAO report, the Pentagon contended it had provided a solid rationale for seeking the provisions. It argued that the term "exemptions" shouldn't be used because it was an oversimplification that "unnecessarily reinforces the perception that DOD has sought to avoid its environmental stewardship responsibilities."
A Pentagon spokeswoman, Cheryl Irwin, declined Friday to comment beyond the written response, saying the report had not yet been reviewed.
In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the Pentagon asked Congress for limited exemptions from six major environmental laws, contending they could interfere with training and combat preparations.
The Pentagon got its way with the Endangered Species Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Congress, however, balked on exemptions for three other laws: the Clean Air Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which governs disposal of solid and hazardous waste; and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, which gives the government authority and resources to clean up hazardous substances.
The Pentagon, whose bases cover vast swathes of beaches, deserts and other undeveloped land across the country, said it wanted flexibility to move forces and equipment in areas that don't meet air-quality standards. Pentagon officials said that lawsuits under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act could impede live-fire training exercises and said they were concerned munitions practices could trigger Superfund requirements. But the Pentagon provided no examples of problems actually caused by the laws, the GAO said.
Despite the concern of some environmental groups, GAO investigators found no examples of where the exemptions from the endangered species and migratory bird laws had hurt the environment. The impact of the marine mammal exemption was not yet determined, GAO said.
Investigators even cited some examples where service branches helped endangered species, such as by moving turtle nests away from training beaches at Camp Lejeune, N.C. Thanks to such measures, endangered species populations are increasing at several bases, GAO said, citing the red-cockaded woodpecker at Fort Stewart, Ga., and Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.; the loggerhead shrike at Naval Base Coronado in California; and the Sonoran pronghorn on the Air Force's Barry M. Goldwater Range in Arizona.
GAO concluded that there is "little evidence to support the position that providing DOD additional environmental exemptions, such as those that have been proposed from provisions of the Clean Air Act, RCRA and CERCLA, would benefit DOD training activities or improve military readiness."
At the rate we’re going, we will be the endangered species soon enough.
Yep. Wait ‘til McCain with his global-warming fears takes over as CIC. The military might as well get used to practicing with wooden rifles again.
Even more anti-American moles in our government (not just in the judicial branch).
We will all be subject to Sharia Law before it is all over with...under the Cult of Obama-Messiah Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.