Posted on 03/07/2008 5:49:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Conservative Christian leaders are outraged at the California appeals court decision last week rejecting a parent's right to educate their children at home.
“What has occurred is another egregious decision handed down by a California appeals court that strikes at the very heart and soul of families and their children," said Focus on the Family founder and chairman Dr. James Dobson, in a broadcast Friday. "How dare these judges have the audacity to label tens of thousands of parents criminals – the equivalent to drug dealers or pickpockets – because they want to raise and educate their children according to their deeply held values?"
The state appellate court ruled that parents must have a teaching credential to homeschool their children. Otherwise, children ages 6 to 18 must attend public or private school full-time until graduation from high school.
"Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children," Justice H. Walter Croskey wrote in a Feb. 28 opinion for the 2nd District Court of Appeal.
Those words "are nothing less than explosive," said Rev. Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
The Pacific Justice Institute estimates there are 166,000 California students who are homeschooled.
"This is an all-out assault on the family, and it must be met with a concerted effort to defend parents and their children,” said Dobson whose prominent family organization will do whatever it can to get the ruling overturned. “We will team with key allies and use every means at our disposal to make sure that not just every Californian, but every American, is aware of this miscarriage of justice. We will encourage them, by the hundreds of thousands, to make their voices heard on this matter."
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger also denounced the ruling and promised on Friday to ensure that parents have the rights to homeschool their children.
"Every California child deserves a quality education and parents should have the right to decide what's best for their children," the governor said in a statement. "Parents should not be penalized for acting in the best interests of their children's education. This outrageous ruling must be overturned by the courts and if the courts don't protect parents' rights then, as elected officials, we will."
The ruling stems from a case involving Phillip and Mary Long, parents of eight children. One of the children reported "physical and emotional mistreatment by the children's father."
All of the children had been enrolled in Sunland Christian School, an institution that coordinates independent study programs for homeschooling families. They were educated by their mother at home and occasionally took tests at the school.
The appellate panel ruled that the family is violating state laws since Mary Long does not have a teaching credential.
Philip Long said he objected to his children being taught in a public school and wanted to protect them until they're mature enough to deal with such topics as evolution and homosexuality.
"I believe the Creator wants us to protect our children from things we believe are hazardous to their character," he said, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
The immediate impact of the ruling is not clear but advocates for homeschooling families vowed to appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, Mohler of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary says homeschool advocates are already taking action.
"Even as the court's decision is expected to be stayed pending appeal, some parents are already making clear that they will move their families from the state if necessary," he said. "If parents have no constitutional right to educate their own children, what other aspects of the parent's choices for their own children lack protection? This question reaches far beyond educational decisions."
I guess the courts are going to allow vouchers?
Anyone see a snowball in hell yet?
I guess the courts are going to allow vouchers?
Anyone see a snowball in hell yet?
Of course is parents simply get an education degree and join the teacher’s union all is well!
Leave California.
The ACLJ and other Pro-Christian Law groups are working on this as we speak, don’t move yet!!
Mexifornia is beyond hope.
Hm?..Now, if Rush, Sean, and OReilly would pick up on this and push this story?....But then again, I have never seen a snowball in hell.
LA Times got the story wrong and are spinning people up. This ruling does nothing to effect home schooling rules. This lady was not following the rules.
Take a chill pill, Californians.
You’ve got it...
We got out of California 20 years ago, but the trouble is, California keeps catching up with us. This really is a time for folks to wake up. Many years ago, a U.S. House or Senate bill had a provision that would have negatively affected homeschoolers across the nation. Folks here started lining up at their local congressman’s office. The local staff had never seen such concern and were obviously panicked. They kept dialing the D.C. office, trying to soothe folks and it was only 24 hours before major backtracking was done. The bill was withdrawn pronto.
We're going to stay and fight. We can't always run to greener pastures. The problems don't just go away, they usually follow.
And what rules might these be?
She was suppose to register them as being homeschooled and didn’t. They were suppose to be in a charter school.
Thanks. ;-)
Have you read the opinion?
The odd thing here is the Gub is calling it an outrageous decision,, yet he didn’t have any problem with signing off on SB777, a monstrosity of a law that , in essence, pushes a GLBT agenda in the public schools.
That was the purpose of it.
imagine life under socialists like Hillary Rodham Clinton or Barack Hussein Obama.
I’m not clear on your comment Vet . We have truckloads of Socialistic “ Programs “ in the FedGov budget year in and year out now .
How are they really so different from any other of the voted in types who swear upon the Bible to uphold the Constitution and dont ?
I’m excusing Mr. Hunter and 3-4 other’s from the above comment and telling me that the Rats will get us to full fledged Socialism faster aint washing the dog this time .
It was a confidential proceeding. So there are questions whether this is a sweeping ruling or just one that applies to this case.
They most certainly do.
Rulings by The Supreme Court of the United States
"In 1925, the Supreme Court decided the Pierce v. Society of Sisters6 - In Pierce, the Supreme Court struck down an Oregon compulsory education law which, in effect, required attendance of all children between ages eight and sixteen at public schools. The Court declared,
Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children.7 "
http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/000000/00000075.asp
They darn well better get that appeal going and get this SCOTUS ruling in there - or this will spread like wildfire...The Socialist's are threatened by not being able to get their hands on all children as early as possible - also the MAIN motif behind "Head Start" - I read it word for word in one of my state's Education Dept. booklet at a convention: "We must get to the children before their parents have instilled their values in them."
Memorize that! It should send a shiver up your spine...
I got an email from the Schwarzeneggar camp that states he disagrees with this ruling. IT’S ODD THAT HE DISAGREES SINCE THE JUDGES MAKING THIS DECISION WERE APPOINTED BY HIM.
This outrageous ruling must be overturned by the courts and if the courts don’t protect parents’ rights then, as elected officials, we will.”
“We must get to the children before their parents have instilled their values in them.”
Modern day slavery at it’s finest .
Please, someone … direct me to that part of the constitution that makes public school mandatory (or even makes public school part of government empowerment). Or better yet, an amendment that forces all American children to be part of a public (government) school system? Help!
If this doesn’t start a revolution, there never will be one.
I can imagine the chaos that would ensue. Imagine Hillary or Obama
signing a law stating that no employer will be allowed to hire anybody
not belonging to a union. Well, thats exactly what's happening here.
Of course it's under the guise of the CHEEEELDREN!
The NEA must own this judge..
(crickets)
“The ACLJ and other Pro-Christian Law groups are working on this as we speak, don’t move yet!!”
From one who used to exist in the hell called California, my advice to any FReeper still living there is simple: move. Sure, the lawyers might put off the day of reckoning a bit on this particular issue. But while they’re taking care of that, ten more pandora’s boxes will be open up.
bttt
Let’s check our facts. From HSLDA:
“The Court also certified its decision for publication, which means that the decision can now be cited as legal authority by all other courts in California.”
HSDLA will seek to depublish the ruling.
Tuition tax credits to the payor are better. Means the schools can keep their values and not worry about taking public money that would force them to comply.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.