Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush for biofuels threatens starvation on a global scale
Times Online ^ | March 7, 2008 | Lewis Smith and Francis Elliott

Posted on 03/07/2008 9:57:20 PM PST by TBP

The rush towards biofuels is theatening world food production and the lives of billions of people, the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser said yesterday.

Professor John Beddington put himself at odds with ministers who have committed Britain to large increases in the use of biofuels over the coming decades. In his first important public speech since he was appointed, he described the potential impacts of food shortages as the “elephant in the room” and a problem which rivalled that of climate change.

“It’s very hard to imagine how we can see the world growing enough crops to produce renewable energy and at the same time meet the enormous demand for food,” he told a conference on sustainability in London yesterday.

“The supply of food really isn’t keeping up.”

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; disaster; energy; envirowackos; globalwarming; greens
Just another potential disaster the left is causing, and they obviously don't care, as long as they get power and money out of it. (Sex wouldn't be bad eitehr. These are the only three things people on the left of the spectrum care about.)
1 posted on 03/07/2008 9:57:21 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

Of course we could stop feeding all our grain to cattle and become vegetarians ... but maybe that’s the ultimate plan.


2 posted on 03/07/2008 9:59:58 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The radical environmental liberals to the world’s poor...
“Let them eat biofuels!”


3 posted on 03/07/2008 10:00:15 PM PST by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Don’t look at me. My car gets 8 miles per meal.


4 posted on 03/07/2008 10:01:43 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

We have to protect the mosquitos of Alaska. Don’t drill in ANWR!


5 posted on 03/07/2008 10:03:54 PM PST by Tribune7 (How is inflicting pain and death on an innocent, helpless human being for profit, moral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
This is how "global warming" really kills.
6 posted on 03/07/2008 10:05:51 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

>>Of course we could stop feeding all our grain to cattle and become vegetarians ... but maybe that’s the ultimate plan.<<

I paid $11.99 a pound today for rib eye at Kroger but there is no substitute for good beef.

Whereas gasoline is still less than 50 cents a pound.

So I don’t think their plot although they will likely kill millions by starvation as they burn the grains poor people used to eat whereas I’ll work a couple of extra hours a week to pay for my food if I have to.


7 posted on 03/07/2008 10:09:57 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Heck with biofuels! Just start sinking wells really deep and get all the fuel we could ever want and drop the price per gallon to about 30 cents.
8 posted on 03/07/2008 10:14:37 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Heck with biofuels! Just start sinking wells really deep and get all the fuel we could ever want and drop the price per gallon to about 30 cents.

Ummm... there is a cost of finding, drilling, transporting, refining, transporting, storing, pumping gasoline.

9 posted on 03/07/2008 10:17:55 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
The ultimate aim is to kill off all humans and bring back mother earth. After all it is us humans that destroyed the planet.
10 posted on 03/07/2008 10:20:20 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Only governments have the potential for such world class screw ups, calamitous loss of life, and mind-numbing cost.
11 posted on 03/07/2008 10:20:54 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
This biofuel thing will be abandoned only when people literally start to die of starvation. Not before. That is how liberal mind works.
12 posted on 03/07/2008 10:23:44 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

http://www.planetark.com/avantgo/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=47073
Although the European Union wants to increase biofuel use to stop global warming, Germany has started taxing biodiesel as the government said it cannot afford to lose the large tax revenue from fossil diesel. “The tax means that biodiesel is now more expensive than fossil diesel,” said Schrum. “As biodiesel has eight percent less energy content, this means no-one is buying biodiesel.”
He said that trucking companies have turned their backs on biodiesel.

“The market for biodiesel at petrol stations is dead. The industry is basically producing a small amount for blending.”

To reduce the impact of biodiesel taxes, Germany introduced compulsory blending of biodiesel with fossil diesel at oil refineries in January 2007.

The BBK says the 4.8 percent biodiesel blended content in fossil diesel would create demand for about 1.5 million tonnes of biodiesel annually.

But a high proportion of the biodiesel used for blending is coming from the United States and is being sold cheaply in Europe with the help of US subsidies.


13 posted on 03/07/2008 10:30:25 PM PST by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Ummm... there is a cost of finding, drilling, transporting, refining, transporting, storing, pumping gasoline.

ANWR has been gridded, studied and drilled. The oil is there. The wells are there but they've been capped. You think the oil companies would spend a GO-zillion amount of bucks to push and fight for a shot at oil without doing the research first? If they gamble and lose they're out billions and have a lot of very unhappy stockholders.

Transporting from Alaska is no big deal with the pipeline, I would think.

REFINING is the sticking point. This country hasn't built a new refinery in almost 30 years! We almost did but the liberals whined and cried and said it would take over ten years to realize any real results so folks gave up. That was 10 years ago when the price of gas was.....? Now, 10 years later as gas is getting ready to hit almost $4 a gallon ... and we could have been able to tell OPEC to go do you-know-what. The oil companies never really fought for refineries because that's not where the money is. As long as there is a knot in supply due to refining capacity, the cost stays high. Mark my words if we did suddenly build refineries, the big oil companies would just sell their oil overseas where they could keep prices high. UN-American you say? Well, you'd be right except that these big corporations don't see themselves as US companies. Noooooo they're citizens of the the "world."

14 posted on 03/07/2008 10:37:36 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; CygnusXI; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; ...
 


Global Warming Scam News & Views

15 posted on 03/07/2008 10:38:30 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I heard a story on the news that said (I think it was) wheat production was down due to the farmers using more of their fields for corn as opposed to it. At this point, we have plenty of food to sustain the world. Unfortuantely, there is a good deal of waste which could be used to feed those starving. I can’t imagine trying to plant corn to run our vehicles and eat, along with all the other crops. The left is causing a good deal of it with their man made global warming scare. The enviros ought to have a global warming meeting outside in South Western Ohio tonight. If they aren’t froze and buried in snow by morning, they might change their tune.


16 posted on 03/07/2008 10:39:53 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enviros_kill; TBP; who_would_fardels_bear; anonsquared; D-fendr; Tribune7; Carry_Okie; gondramB; ...
We have all the oil we need for the next century...

800 Billion Barrels of Shale Oil In Western U.S. (Triple Saudia Arabia's Reserves)

How much are we going to put up with before people stand up and shout, "Enough!" Are we going to let a few envirosocialists fundamentally restructure society over a hoax?

I wouldn't have believed it a few years ago, but then I wouldn't have believed a Republican president would sign a bill into law that banned incandescent light bulbs.

17 posted on 03/07/2008 10:40:05 PM PST by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

On second thought, maybe the left would like world starvation. That would thin the population and improve the environment. Hmmmm.....


18 posted on 03/07/2008 10:42:34 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Don’t look at me. My car gets 8 miles per meal.

I like that! Ha!

19 posted on 03/07/2008 10:46:19 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBP
...Last year President Bush called for a massive increase in the use of ethanol in America over the next decade. The US now devotes more acreage to growing corn than at any time since 1944. Farmers planted 90.5 million acres in 2007, 15 per cent more than a year before. If White House efforts to double ethanol production this year are achieved, and in due course 40 per cent of that corn ends up in petrol tanks, the world will face a harder and costlier time feeding itself...

Bush's fault?

I saw this professor interveiwed. What they left out of this article was...he said food shortages will in great part be due to changing eating habits. Primarily on the part of the Indians and Chinese, who are demanding more dairy and meat in their diets. There's a silver lining to every cloud, I immediately thought. Our Aussie farmers are going to love this development, they've been struggling to make ends meet for decades. It's indeed an ill wind that blows no-body any good...

Let them eat cake! Dairy and meat will always cost more than rice and noodles.

20 posted on 03/07/2008 10:51:34 PM PST by Fred Nerks (a fair dinkum aussie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

You mean changing to biofuels have unintended consequences for the world??

Funny that.


21 posted on 03/07/2008 10:56:03 PM PST by kb2614 (Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

A video game came out recently titled Frontlines: Fuel of War. The premise of the game is America/European Union fighting the Russians/Chinese for the last remaining natural resources.

The game mentioned that the oil was being used for the military. Not the citizens of the countries.

Be ever vigilant


22 posted on 03/07/2008 10:59:34 PM PST by wastedyears (Iron Maiden in two weeks' time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Let them eat grubs.


23 posted on 03/07/2008 11:04:59 PM PST by txflake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Just another potential disaster the left is causing, and they obviously don't care, as long as they get power and money out of it.

MIT has a story (Emerging Technologies for 2008) out on sensible ethanol technology .

It states that cellulosic biomass not food grains have the most promising future.

I am not sure of all the facts, but already the Airforce in a just a few years (announced in December) will be flying on this type or similar biofuel. This beat out Virgin's owner, most recent marketing hype, (Branson) on his trans ocean Virgin AA flight with no passengers on only 20% biofuel content.

http://www.technologyreview.com

Mining Pathways for Biofuels", Cellulolytic Enzymes and Ethanol from Old Tires and Garbage" Brazil is already making and exporting $$$ ethanol from sugar cane waste after the sugar has been extracted.

24 posted on 03/07/2008 11:07:41 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

“Don’t look at me. My car gets 8 miles per meal.”

A quick search came up with numerous results that 1 tank of biofuel for an SUV (say 25 gallons?) has enough corn in it to feed a person for a year. (Not sure if “feed” means total calories, or just the amount of corn they would eat in a year). Regardless - the food to gas conversion seems awful lopsided. Not counting that it takes more energy to turn the corn into a gallon of fuel than the amount of energy in a gallon of gas.


25 posted on 03/07/2008 11:11:05 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txflake; Fred Nerks

Let them eat unleaded.


26 posted on 03/07/2008 11:13:48 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

You’re preaching to the choir. My wife worked for Texaco Oil for thirty years at their world headquarters and knew many of the top echelon excutives.


27 posted on 03/07/2008 11:16:44 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TBP
There is a picture I saw recently that illustrates this perfectly:

The cartoon picture showed a starving little black child sitting on the bare bround about to eat a corn and here comes along big fat AL GORE who grabs it from the starving child saying "Hey kid, I'm important and I need this for my SUV!!"

28 posted on 03/07/2008 11:18:04 PM PST by prophetic (I'm not afraid of calling his full name: Obama's full name is BARAK HUSSIEN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

There is a saying (i read the other day).... to paraphrase:

“Politicains are the only people in the world that can screw things up and then be ‘hired’ back to fix it.”


29 posted on 03/07/2008 11:20:46 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
From you bio: I have been an NRA certified Instructor for many years and I'm also an IDPA Certified Range Officer...and of course I'm a IDPA competitor every month.

How come almost all of the IDPA web sites are so uninformative as to be worthless.

There are a gazillion pages of rules and regulations, but the shooting sites don't even post event dates or directions. The scores are meaingless if one doesn't even know what all the acronyms mean.

It appears to be a closed and unfriendly community.

Any ideas since I'm an avid pistol shooter and would have liked to shoot competitively.

30 posted on 03/07/2008 11:24:42 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TBP

As Tinky Holloway would say “ Don’t worry someone will do something”.


31 posted on 03/07/2008 11:44:36 PM PST by fella (Is he al-taquiya or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This biofuel thing will be abandoned only when people literally start to die of starvation. Not before. That is how liberal mind works.

No, not even then. Just remember what the Soviets did to the Ukrainians while the N.Y. Times gushed all over themselves while giving the Soviets praise.

32 posted on 03/07/2008 11:49:13 PM PST by fella (Is he al-taquiya or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I’m kinda tired of those who think that the US should feed the
world for less than the burn value of grain.


33 posted on 03/08/2008 12:51:25 AM PST by patch789 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP; cogitator

BTTT!

Paul Ehrlich’s nightmare could come true, courtesy of the ethanol scam.


34 posted on 03/08/2008 3:05:59 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur
How much are we going to put up with before people stand up and shout, "Enough!"

As I implied on another thread, the higher gas prices are probably making liberals euphoric. They'll never stop trying to block our efforts to obtain our own energy.

35 posted on 03/08/2008 3:10:16 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: patch789

Did you see John Negroponte’s appearance before Congress regarding the State Dept budget of almost $100Billion to give away in foreign aid?


36 posted on 03/08/2008 3:44:08 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Dems are sooooooo stupid. They think the whole world hates us now, just wait. The base cost of simple, unprocessed, basic food items have gone up 150% in the past 6 months alone.

Think about all those 3rd world countries that spend most of their GPD to barely feed their people as it is and now they will only be able to buy 1/3rd of what they were getting with the same dollars so Americans can feel better about the environment.

It's a good thing we have the best military in the world because what we are doing in the name of "Global Warming" is an act of genocide and what has got to be the most justifiable reasons any country could ever have to declare war on the United States.

37 posted on 03/08/2008 3:54:46 AM PST by txroadkill (Liberals believe that the only oppressed people in Cuba are the terrorist in GitMo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enviros_kill

By reducing the energy content of a gallon of biodiesel they are reducing the mpg. Reduced mpg means more gallons bought. More gallons bought means increased tax revenue. Follow the money.


38 posted on 03/08/2008 4:04:30 AM PST by 2right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The rush towards biofuels is theatening world food production and the lives of billions of people, the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser said yesterday.

Thank you, the environmental movement and your absurd aversion to petroleum. Of course, given your track record of hatred toward human beings and your wish that human life be eradicated from the planet, this consequence of biofuel farming cannot have been an oversight.
39 posted on 03/08/2008 4:09:43 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“Of course we could stop feeding all our grain to cattle and become vegetarians ... but maybe that’s the ultimate plan.”

Well that’s the PETA wing of the Democrat party’s plan.


40 posted on 03/08/2008 4:34:23 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Shouldn't the libs love a Hunter Thompson ticket in 08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Racist liberals have been trying to kill off “useless eaters” in the Third World for decades. They lack Hitler’s tanks and gas ovens so use more sophisticated schemes to muder people, i.e., DDT ban; environmentalism; denial of money for rural water projects.


41 posted on 03/08/2008 6:03:28 AM PST by sergeantdave (Governments hate armed citizens more than armed criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
In his first important public speech since he was appointed, he described the potential impacts of food shortages as the “elephant in the room” and a problem which rivalled[sic] that of climate change.

Yeah...billions of people starving to death "rivals" a temperature increase of maybe a degree or so.

42 posted on 03/08/2008 8:35:09 AM PST by xjcsa (I hated McCain before hating McCain was cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur
How much are we going to put up with before people stand up and shout, "Enough!" Are we going to let a few envirosocialists fundamentally restructure society over a hoax?

Envomentalism is the religious cannon of the socialists. Through it, they seek to control the world. Unless we stop them. "Global Warming" is their trump card (the greatest hoax of all time, but look at how the sheeple react.)

43 posted on 03/08/2008 9:03:28 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: geopyg
1 tank of biofuel for an SUV (say 25 gallons?) has enough corn in it to feed a person for a year.

I was hoping someone would be less lazy than I and look up the stats.

Food to gas is the also biosphere to energy. As you point out, it's the least efficient. Because it's the least dense. Progress has been to more and more dense sources of energy. There's a reason we grew in power exponentially when we went from horse/hay to horsepower/oil.

thanks for your reply.

44 posted on 03/08/2008 9:08:07 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Paul Ehrlich’s nightmare could come true

Except that for him, I don't think it was a nightmare.

45 posted on 03/08/2008 8:21:59 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This biofuel thing will be abandoned only when people literally start to die of starvation.

As if liberals care about that!

This biofuel thing will be abandoned only when LIBERALS literally start to die of starvation.

46 posted on 03/08/2008 8:30:05 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TBP
You can not get something for nothing. Even wind power costs 14 cents a kilowatt and coal produced costs 2 1/2 cents per kilowatt.
47 posted on 03/08/2008 8:35:39 PM PST by Big Horn (Life is a sexually transmitted disease that is 100% fatal . Author unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson