Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hothead McCain (and the ideas coming out of his foreign-policy brain trust)
The Nation ^ | posted March 6, 2008 (March 24, 2008 issue) | Robert Dreyfuss

Posted on 03/08/2008 11:30:21 AM PST by K-oneTexas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: calcowgirl

Article that generate thought and make the grey matter work are pretty good from any site.


21 posted on 03/08/2008 12:33:05 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: safeasthebanks

I read to generate ideas. I also find in reading these others sites exactly what the other side is thinking and then I can prepare an answer to it. Living in a place as liberal as Austin Texas, thanks to the transplants from elsewhere, I get an opportunity to throw it back in many a place. You pick their specifics and throw it back ... not haphazardly.


22 posted on 03/08/2008 12:37:21 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
"League of Democracies" that can bypass the balky United Nations, from an expanded NATO that will bump up against Russian

I guess he is trying to win over us conservatives. Go McCain!

23 posted on 03/08/2008 12:38:57 PM PST by McGruff (Tribal name: 'One with many knives in back')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
So do you agree with this drivel or not?

Sorry, but for me you've been here long enough to know how to use a "barf alert", or at least to post a comment with the article saying you know that what you are posting is crap, but it's just for educational purposes (or something like that).

Just common courtesy, especially with an article from a lefty rag like this.

24 posted on 03/08/2008 12:43:56 PM PST by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
"He is the lesser of three evils at this point in my mind."

I am still a "NONE OF THE ABOVE" voter!

25 posted on 03/08/2008 12:48:41 PM PST by DeaconRed (We must make sure our Brave Military gets the support to Win This WAR. Not another Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

That usually helps one of the greater. I’ve never seen a perfect candidate. It always seems to come down to one being better than the other. I thought Hunter was great if that gives you a clue as to my mindset. Not voting is a differential vote for someone else. I hope you don’t sit it out.


26 posted on 03/08/2008 12:54:23 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

“We must make sure our Brave Military gets the support to Win This WAR. Not another Viet Nam”

Nothing more to be said!!!


27 posted on 03/08/2008 12:55:24 PM PST by malia (God Bless America, our troops & their families sacrificing so they can serve their country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

bump


28 posted on 03/08/2008 1:14:50 PM PST by Grunthor (None of the Above 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If “The Nation” doesn’t like him, then he must be good.

Proving once again that there must be a marked difference between Obama & Hillary on one side and McCain on the other, regardless of what some here believe.

29 posted on 03/08/2008 1:18:48 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
From the article:
Not surprisingly, the center of McCain's foreign policy is the Middle East. "He's bought into the completely fallacious notion that we're in a global struggle of us-versus-them. He calls it the 'transcendental threat...of extreme Islam," says Daalder. "But it's a silly argument to think that this is either an ideological or a material struggle on a par with [the ones against] Nazi Germany or Soviet Communism." For McCain, the Iraq War, the conflict with Iran, the Arab-Israeli dispute, the war in Afghanistan, the Pakistani crisis and the lack of democracy in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are all rolled up into one "transcendent" ball of wax.

I agree with McCain on this -- we are up against an Islamic front that wants to see the West in general the America specifically conquered into submission.

As to Russia...
On the one hand his aggressiveness could cause trouble with the Russians. On the other hand, it worked for Reagan and thus maybe aggressiveness against Russia and China is also needed to counter Putin who is even more confrontational than McCain (as in bomber overflights and threats of targeting with nuclear missiles).

I'm reminded of LBJ's campaign which was saying that if we voted for Goldwater, there would be war. Well, some of us voted for Goldwater and there was war.

30 posted on 03/08/2008 1:20:41 PM PST by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: safeasthebanks
I don't agree. As I said I read it to learn. This one states who is advising McCain, by name, on Foreign Policy. Things any informed voter might want to know. Some Bush 1 and Clinton policy wonks.

If Foreign Policy matters need a "Barf Alert" for you, well maybe posts on Radical Islam do too.

Read to learn!!!
31 posted on 03/08/2008 1:31:58 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Solitar
Looking way back at Goldwater vs. Johnson.

Johnson successfully portrayed Goldwater as a 'Warmonger" and someone who would have no problem with pushing the missle button first and asking questions later. It was the scare of nuclear war with Russia that had Goldwater in trouble. It was only a year and a half previous to the election that we almost had a real nuclear war over Cuba.

In early '64, Vietnam was a minor issue and just starting to get legs, so the "warmonger" taint was easily spread over Barry on that concern too. JMO.

32 posted on 03/08/2008 1:35:56 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
And that's the problem. If it wasn't for that and his distaste for free speech, I could work with him.
33 posted on 03/08/2008 2:37:39 PM PST by isrul (Help make koranimals an endangered species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
If the Rats think “hothead” will bring down McCain they better think again, it will probably give him a 10 point bump if he keeps doing it to the MSM.

He usually directs it at conservatives.

34 posted on 03/08/2008 3:26:14 PM PST by xjcsa (I hated McCain before hating McCain was cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jubail
It is just not the same. This is not 1976. The schools are controlled by far lefties. Most of the mainstream churches are controlled by far lefties. Reform Synagogues are embarrasing. The MSM is—well, you know. Talk radio is losing its effectiveness in gaining converts. Basically the only place we have that still allows us to have a voice is the presidency.

Take the presidency away and the Supreme Court will turn sharply left, the Presidency will be left and the Congress will remain left.

If this were not so, we would be not fighting to hold onto Nevada, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, and Virginia. But it is so and we are in real danger of losing those states. Think to yourself—how many blue states are drifting red? Answer: none. How many red states and purple states are drifting blue. Answer: PA, OH, VA, MO, NV, AZ, NM, TN, and the entire upper Midwest.

So, we need to hold on and McCain is going to be the only voice we have.

35 posted on 03/08/2008 3:32:18 PM PST by mcvey (Fight on. Do not give up. Ally with those you must. Defeat those you can. And fight on whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Ted Kennedy has placed the nose ring in McNuts long ago.


36 posted on 03/14/2008 8:42:45 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
We here at FR castigate the mindless masses for buying into left-wing, radical, socialist, commie propaganda emanating from all varieties of media. The Nation is premier among this group.

Yet, this article planted on FR elicits all kinds of comments based on it, without any question at all as to the authenticity of what's presented. It's all so "scholarly", you know, so "inside stuff", therefore everything in it must be true.

I suggest we freepers keep our heads clear and ready for more of this on McCain in the months ahead. I suggest we wait and see what actually comes out of McCain's mouth and official campaign before we go off all hysterical. There's a deep-seated hatred of the GOP nominee-presumptive by a vocal minority here who apparently never sleep. Take what they say and what marxist rags like The Nation say and do your own thinking. Much depends on it.

Remember the freeper poll showed McCain support (holding nose or not) to be around 70%. This means the McCain haters have a lot of work to do on all the various threads. We must remain adept at separating the wheat from the chaff and seek the truth, not being knee-jerk when unfounded propaganda is posted.

Leni

37 posted on 03/14/2008 8:57:44 AM PDT by MinuteGal (I Love My Country More Than I Hate McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
This article for me was extremely interesting because of the people named, the "inside stuff".  Just as it is reading those associated with Obama  and Hillary. McCain seems to have the interest of many "old hands" from the Reagan and Bush 41 Administrations and some, not as well known, from the Bush 43 Administration. Obama, from many articles I've read, has the"old hands" from the Carter Administration.

[It's also funny (but a new topic from this threat) that many from the Reagan and Bush 41 Administrations are the "Shadow Warriors" (from Kenneth Timmerman's book of the same title)  along with  Clinton "holdovers" that have tried so hard to derail or re-route the Bush 42 Iraq policy.]


John McCain (frorm Sourcewatch):

"From the Bush Team"


Policy advisers


Foreign policy advisers

McCain is "also being advised on foreign policy by neoconservatives. McCain is supported by Robert Kagan, a noted American Enterprise Institute chickenhawk and the author of the surge policy, and former CIA director Jim Woolsey, who, like [Norman] Podhoretz, has called for a World War against Islam. Leading neocon lobbyist Randy Scheunemann, who headed the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq and was on the board of the Project for the New American Century, completes the McCain foreign policy and security team. There are reports that McCain will lose some of his advisers as his campaign is in trouble and that they might gravitate to Romney and Giuliani. McCain also had considerable interaction with neocon elder statesman Richard Perle in the early days of his campaign, but Perle has decided that McCain cannot win the nomination. Perle is deferring judgment on where he should go next. Bill Kristol of The Weekly Standard and Henry Kissinger are also reported to be giving McCain advice."[23]

In October 2007, the Washington Post listed the following as McCain's foreign policy advisers.[24]


Other advisers


38 posted on 03/14/2008 9:58:03 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All
Obama's advisers (from Sourcewatch). Was in Houston all week and the AM Talk Radio SHows (several locals) stated that Obama's pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was on a sabattical from the church to be an adviser on Obama's Campaign. Unknown if this is true or false, just heard on the radio while driving.

 

Economic advisers

Foreign policy advisers

"Obama's key advisers who speak for him on foreign policy include Gregory Craig, Anthony Lake, and Samantha Power. Craig is a leading Washington lawyer who was a White House special counsel under Bill Clinton and defended the president in his impeachment trial. Lake was also a Bill Clinton adviser who was involved in the Bosnian conflict. Power is an Irish-born Harvard professor from the Kennedy School who is regarded as an expert on Third World issues. None of the three is considered to be particularly partisan on any foreign policy issues but genocide, which Power has written a book about, but Obama is also accelerating his efforts to woo Jewish donors and to improve his standing with AIPAC, which has been suspicious of him because of youthful indiscretions that included expressions of sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians. He recently appointed Eric Lynn as "liaison to Jewish Community and advisor on Middle East issues".[11]

Accompanying Obama when he "outlin[es] his views on the Iraq war in a major speech [September 12, 2007,] in Iowa" will be Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter's "national security advisor, who says that Obama offers 'a new definition of America's role in the world.'"[12]

In October 2007, the Washington Post published a list of Obama's foreign policy advisers.[13]

TheRealNews.com has a report on Obama's foreign policy advisors [12].

 

39 posted on 03/14/2008 10:43:47 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillar's team (from Sourcewatch) Don't know if Wilson is till on board.

 

Foreign policy team

Clinton is "regarded as by far the more conservative candidate in that she has carefully triangulated her potential supporters and is unwilling to say that her vote in the Senate in support of the Iraq war was a mistake. She has also positioned herself with the Israel lobby through her pledge to disarm Iran by whatever means necessary and her threat to use nuclear weapons on terrorists. Her foreign policy advisers are a who's who of neoliberal hawks, including former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who famously believed that the deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children due to sanctions was 'worth it.' Clinton is also being advised by Richard Holbrooke, who is reported to be close to Paul Wolfowitz. Holbrooke is a possible candidate for secretary of state if Clinton is elected president. Holbrooke has been a supporter of the Iraq war, and he was an architect of the 1999 bombing of Serbia. Strobe Talbott, who advised Bill Clinton and was also involved with the bombing of Serbia, is reported to be another Hillary adviser," Philip Giraldi wrote August 14, 2007, at Antiwar.com.[10] TheRealNews.com has a report on Hillary Clinton's foreign policy advisors [2].

In October 2007, the Washington Post published a list of Clinton's foreign policy advisers.[11]

 

40 posted on 03/14/2008 10:49:16 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson