To make it fair they have a right to poison us all.
That way we are all equal.
/sarcasm off/
Posted on 03/08/2008 1:19:14 PM PST by Roberts
When nurses from Blood Bank of the Redwoods set up their needles, blood machines and cartons of high-fructose juice at Sonoma State University last week, 94 students, faculty and staff members donated blood.
Math professor Rick Luttmann was not one of them.
He was ineligible, he said, because of a federal Food and Drug Administration ban on blood donations from men who had had sex with men. A ban that he said amounts to unlawful discrimination.
Blood drives are the newest battleground for SSU faculty members who, led by Luttmann, are out to purge organizations on the 8,500-student campus they say discriminate against gays .
In a resolution to the school's Academic Senate, Luttmann has asked that SSU discontinue all campus blood drives because the FDA ban violates the school's anti-discrimination policy.
Blood bank officials say SSU accounts for about 5 percent of the regional blood supply.
SSU's administration has not taken a position on the proposed resolution, said Susan Kashack, university spokeswoman.
It is not the first time faculty members have argued against allowing an organization on campus because of similar concerns. In October, SSU canceled a $15,000 athletic sponsorship deal with the Army after faculty members complained that the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy for gay service members violated the campus policy.
If the blood bank resolution is approved by the faculty, as Luttmann predicts it will be, it will go the administration to decide whether blood drives can be continued on campus.
"The blood banks say if you are gay you are second-class, your blood isn't worthy," Luttmann said. "If the administration is really serious about the nondiscrimination policy, then we can't tolerate blood banks."
Luttmann's proposal comes on the heels of a San Jose State University decision in January to ban blood banks from conducting drives there because of discrimination issues.
While San Jose State students supported the ban, many SSU students appear to oppose it.
"People need access to blood. At any moment someone could need a transfusion," said student Skye Nashelsky, president of the Queer Straight Alliance. "The FDA is discriminating, but it's people who need blood who would be punished if we banned blood drives."
Men who have had sex with men since 1977 are eliminated from the donor pool because the FDA recognizes them as a risk of HIV infection.
The Red Cross and blood banks across the nation, including Blood Bank of the Redwoods, support lifting the lifetime ban on blood donations from such men, said Kent Corley, spokesman for Blood Bank of the Redwoods. Current HIV tests screen blood with minimal problems, he said.
However, Corley also said the ban relates to sexual history and not sexual orientation and does not constitute discrimination.
He cautioned SSU faculty against their effort.
"If we can't call on the community to step up the blood supply because of an issue like this, it would be unfortunate. People would not get the blood they need," he said.
"SSU represents a big donor base for us," Corley said, noting 350 new donors sign up at Sonoma State every year.
Last year, SSU students, faculty and staff donated 619 units of blood in 12 drives, said Diana Nation, chairwoman of JUMP, a community-building student association on campus.
That represents 5 percent of Blood Bank of the Redwoods' three-county supply, Corley said, and a potentially significant long-term supply if young student donors get in the habit of giving blood regularly.
"Nobody wants to see anybody discriminated against. I mean, that's not what we're trying to promote by wanting to promote the blood drives," Nation said. "But we feel the benefits outweigh the cost at this time."
Student leaders are considering a resolution opposing Luttmann's proposed ban on blood drives.
"We don't want it to look like we're supporting discrimination, but we don't feel qualified to determine if the FDA's ban is incorrect," said Jonathan White, speaker of the Student Senate. "Sponsoring blood drives is good for the whole community."
Students in the Queer Straight Alliance are supporting the blood drives, too, and issued a statement voicing opposition to both the FDA policy and the proposed faculty resolution.
Nashelsky and others in the Queer Straight Alliance are working to develop strategies to educate the community about the FDA's ban without endangering the quantity of the blood supply.
Students unable to contribute to blood drives may be asked to find a donor to give blood in their name. The Queer Straight Alliance may develop an on-campus visual exhibit, such as using pint jars of red-colored water to illustrate how many people wanted to give blood but were not allowed.
Some students, faculty and staff are finding their own ways to cope with the FDA policy.
Luttmann said at the blood drive last week he rolled up his sleeve to give blood while telling blood bank staff he was gay.
"I asked, 'Is that going to be a problem?' and they said 'Yes, I'm sorry, but it is,' " Luttmann said.
He did not give blood.
Nashelsky, whose grandmother received blood during a medical emergency five years ago, said he has donated about 20 times in her name, opting in his words to "lie."
"I want to donate. I know I'm not (HIV) positive. I have safe sex and I get tested regularly," said Nashelsky, who has the coveted O negative blood type.
"I don't like lying. But I can't say 'no, I can't donate. Sorry to ruin your day.' It's a good feeling. It's a gift you're able to give someone."
Math professor, eh? Perhaps he’s a bit weak on probabilities. Could he be a liberal? Oh, now it makes sense.
Why does anyone even listen to this man? Why isn’t he fired for being stupid?
The world REVOLVES AROUND these people.....
Maybe, if they REALLY want to, they could donate blood. Then they could throw it out. Or is it that they want to infect everyone else with AIDS? Or are we supposed to believe that AIDS is just a conspiracy theory? I bet it’s that ....
They couldn’t express their philosophy more clearly: sodomy is holier than life itself.
Yeah right.
He has a constitutional right to make everyone in America die of aids.
Yeah, let’s ban blood tranfusions so friggin a$$hole Luttman won’t feel discriminated against. What if one of his boyfriends needs blood? There won’t be any and he will die. Hmm.
Funny thing is that military personnel who have been in Europe can’t donate either.
Hey professor, do the math. Don't endanger America because your feelings are hurt.
Best bet will be to donate your own blood and have it frozen or get it from a family member that you know is safe.
What a self-centered abomination this jerk is.
Luttman = “butt man”...
THAT is the most disturbing part of the article.
Hey, it’s all about him, donchano.
What?
I was “discriminated” against for years because of countries I had been in. I had been “discriminated” against against because of Malaria. He might not care about HIV, but the rest of us do.
“”I don’t like lying. But I can’t say ‘no, I can’t donate. Sorry to ruin your day.’ It’s a good feeling. It’s a gift you’re able to give someone.””
Tell it to Ryan White.
Its to prevent Mad Cow diesease getting into the blood banks. The question specifically ask if you ate beef products off post.
I believe it has to do with Mad Cow disease.
If the FDA started allowing gay men to donate blood, I’d consider refusing a blood transfusion if I ever needed one. I’d still donate though.
They do have blood substitutes they give to people like JW’s who don’t want blood.
The blood drives don’t accept my blood because of some medications I take. I wonder if I have cause for a lawsuit? < /sarc>
They ban me because I travel to Central America every year and it’s considered a malaria area even if I never see a mosquito on the entire trip.
I want damages! Punitive damages! DISCRIMINATION!!!
I love how they have to be PC and state its not sexual orientation; its sexual history
what’s that saying “a man can build 1,000 bridges and never be known as a bridge builder, but....”
I want to ban liberal proffesors. They discriminate against free thinking people and apparently heterosexuals.
Discrimination = lawful exercise of personal judgment.
It should be a serious crime, in the same category as attempted murder, to falsify a medical history when giving blood.
Easy enough , “Happy People” get blood from their own type,the rest of us poor folks take care of our own.
Well, her hubby allowed it to happen in the prison system in Arkansas and hundreds of people were infected in Canada with HIV from the blood they took from the prisoners.
Current HIV test can’t detect the disease if the donor recently contracted HIV. It takes time for the antibodies to develop. There was a case a few weeks ago of someone who got HIV from an organ transplant. We are not safe unless all homosexual men (the majority of carriers) are rejected.
This man is interfering with MY Right to LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit OF HAPPINNES
The elephant in the room that EVERYONE ignores is that the homosexual lifestyle carries significant, potentially lethal, health hazards as is proven by the fact that a blood bank will turn away blood from gay males.
But do the health hazards of homosexuality ever get discussed? Are children warned about the LETHAL DANGERS?
They are told of the dangers of alcohol and drugs, but gay behavior? - Have at it, it’s “normal”!
We all are supposed to “accept” homosexuality or be branded a bigot. The press and the Gay lobby sweep the problems under the carpet as they beat the drum that there is nothing deviant about their behavior.
God, it would appear, has a different opinion.
No, AIDS is quite real. It was designed by a cabal of Jewish doctors that wanted to kill off blacks. I know this is true because the Honorable Louis Farrakhan (Peace Be Upon Him) told me so.
Arthur Ashe was unavailable for comment...
To make it fair they have a right to poison us all.
That way we are all equal.
/sarcasm off/
Well, I can’t give blood because I’ve had malaria.
Who can I sue?
I see no reason why sodomites should not be banned from giving blood considering they are the primary carriers of AIDS. Anal sex is nothing to be proud of or protected as special under law.
In case you would like to email or call him heres the info
Name: Rick Luttmann
Job Title: Professor of Mathematics
Phone*: (707) 664 2543
Department: Mathematics
Building: Darwin
Room: 114-K
Email Address: rick.luttmann@sonoma.edu
URL:
Truly the left wing is a suicide cult.
They turned me down for donating last time because my iron count was too low! Can I sue, too? I sure could use some cash!
You forgot to add that we should be grateful for that. Let’s have a parade.
good points you make. There are other criteria for blood donations and some will discriminate. There are restrictions about people who have traveled or lived in sub-Saharan Africa I think, or who have been in England during the mad cow outbreak, and a few other health concerns that the blood banks ask about.
Sometimes discriminiation makes sense. In a case of the blood supply, we’re supposed to increase risk to prove we don’t discriminate? But it’s a documented fact that homosexual sex in men spreads various diseases and is risky.
Don’t we all remember in the early to mid 80s there were many people who got AIDS from blood transfusions, specifically because there was no effective screening till then and AIDS was a newly discovered disease then. Why is it wrong to make common sense policies when the goal is public health?
Why is it wrong to make common sense policies when the goal is public health?
Common sense?
A person contracts syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis and they go into the system. Their contacts are traced and tested.
A person contracts HIV and ... nothing. It would be discrimination. We mustn’t let it be known that a carrier is an IV drug user or homosexual. The public be damned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.