Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State's undecided superdelegates bide time
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/11/8 | Zachary Coile

Posted on 03/11/2008 8:15:37 AM PDT by SmithL

Freshman Democratic Rep. Jerry McNerney of Pleasanton has enough to worry about this year: He's in a swing district, and Republicans are working feverishly to unseat him this November.

Now he has another headache: As one of 796 Democratic superdelegates, he could help tilt the presidential nomination to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama or New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. But supporting either one could alienate fans of the other - which could cost McNerney votes he needs this fall.

No surprise, then, that the 56-year-old former wind engineer would prefer to avoid the choice altogether: "I'll make a decision when I have to."

McNerney is not alone. Some superdelegates relish their power in determining the party's nominee, but interviews with uncommitted California superdelegates suggest that many are torn over which candidate to support and are conflicted about their role.

"It's like saying, 'Which are your favorite children?' How are you going to choose?" said Rep. Sam Farr, D-Carmel. "I like them both. I think they would be great together."

Farr's district was divided in California's Feb. 5 primary: Santa Cruz County voted for Obama, while Monterey and Salinas backed Clinton.

McNerney's district, which is based mostly in San Joaquin County, tipped more heavily toward Clinton, but it also contains ardent Obama supporters.

Clinton has called him, urging his support. Voters back home have tried to sway him. McNerney said it's still too soon to make the decision. "I'm going to let the voters decide for themselves," he said.

They may be kingmakers

Many uncommitted superdelegates have been rooting for either candidate to run up a big lead in elected or "pledged" delegates to save them from having to choose the nominee.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: eatingtheirown; hillary; nobama; obama; superdelegates

1 posted on 03/11/2008 8:15:38 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Whoever gives them the most money, perks or whatever they value is WHO they will vote for. It's totally corrupt. Who people VOTE for doesn't matter - so much for the Demoncrats advocating a “democracy”.
2 posted on 03/11/2008 8:19:30 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Democrats abandoned democracy in their own party when the people nominated McGovern.


3 posted on 03/11/2008 8:22:46 AM PDT by SmithL (That's my story & I'm sticking to it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Illinois Sen. Barack Obama or New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Whyfor and howcome does she get her middle name used, but he doesn't?

/ as if I didn't know already.

4 posted on 03/11/2008 8:26:47 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Wind Engineer”?

Like as in Al Gore, wind engineer?


5 posted on 03/11/2008 8:28:43 AM PDT by boocoowell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I read that Spitzer is a superdelegate. Hillary has issued a statement of support.

I guess he will support her, especially since they have stuff in common, besides being arrogant and hypocrites.


6 posted on 03/11/2008 8:54:16 AM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Hillary’s middle name is Diane, not Rodham.


7 posted on 03/11/2008 9:24:13 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...supporting either one could alienate fans of the other - which could cost McNerney votes he needs this fall.

Sweet! Let's hope!

8 posted on 03/11/2008 9:26:39 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The whole point of having "superdelegates" is that you are afraid of the will of the people.

If superdelegates bend to the will of the people, then they are pointless.

If the overrule the people's voice, there will be hell to pay.

Pass the popcorn.

9 posted on 03/11/2008 10:10:11 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson