Skip to comments.
F-117 Stealth Fighter to Be Retired
AP ^
| March 11, 2008
| JAMES HANNAH
Posted on 03/11/2008 8:17:16 AM PDT by Joiseydude
DAYTON, Ohio (AP) - The world's first attack aircraft to employ stealth technology is slipping quietly into history.
The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada.
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, which manages the F-117 program, will have an informal, private retirement ceremony Tuesday with military leaders, base employees and representatives from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.
(Excerpt) Read more at wtop.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-136 next last
To: Joiseydude
I wonder what has replaced it that we have not seen yet?
To: Joiseydude
F-22 Raptor is replacing it ...
Of course, there may be other things as well.
3
posted on
03/11/2008 8:20:16 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Resolute Conservative
4
posted on
03/11/2008 8:20:19 AM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Obama more Left than Teddy. The perfect combination of earnest and absurdly empty pol.)
To: Joiseydude
Is this retirement of all F-117 Fighters, or ‘a’ F-117 fighter?
5
posted on
03/11/2008 8:20:40 AM PDT
by
jerod
(They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
To: Resolute Conservative
wow- if they are retiring this amazing aircraft just imagine what it’s replacement must be like...
I had read something a while back that this aircraft was so invisible that someone had found a way to detect it by scanning the sky for somethign that was NOT there (i.e. background noise being blocked by ‘something’ invisible)
pretty clever
6
posted on
03/11/2008 8:20:45 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: Joiseydude
The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada. Ping for later
7
posted on
03/11/2008 8:20:53 AM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
To: jerod
To: Alex Murphy
Come back after the conspiracy nuts have shown up.
9
posted on
03/11/2008 8:21:45 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Mr. K
Read “Skunkworks”. Really cool stuff. This was pre-F117 days.
One of the funny things was finding dead bats in the F-117 hanger - guess why.
10
posted on
03/11/2008 8:21:59 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
Because the F-117’s were even invisible to the bats.
To: ArrogantBustard
>>Of course, there may be other things as well.<<
Yes. They are all disk or “cigar” shaped.
12
posted on
03/11/2008 8:23:48 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
To: elhombrelibre
The F-22 was designed in the late 80’2 and 90’s and we have seen it for many years. I wonder what is being designed in the last few years that is flying out of Groom Lake and other areas that we haven’t seen yet.
To: Joiseydude
“Invisible” in that the bats’ sonar was not reflected back to them so that they could get an accurate echo.
14
posted on
03/11/2008 8:24:16 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Joiseydude
Making room for the F22 and F35.
The F117 was designed before stealth was possible with curved aircraft.
The new fighters are more aerodynamic and just as stealthy thanks to computerized design and manufacturing.
15
posted on
03/11/2008 8:24:31 AM PDT
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: MrB
I assume that is a joke?
Or are you implying that F117’s don’t reflect sound?
16
posted on
03/11/2008 8:25:46 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
To: Mr. K
I had read something a while back that this aircraft was so invisible that someone had found a way to detect it by scanning the sky for somethign that was NOT there (i.e. background noise being blocked by something invisible) Don't forget that one was shot down and probably looked at by our enemies. They could have tuned their radars just to detect it's signature.
I wouldn't be surprised if this is the reason for retiring it.
17
posted on
03/11/2008 8:27:20 AM PDT
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: Resolute Conservative
People think it's all dreamed up, but our DoD really does have secret programs to which the F117 belonged for a long time. Even in the Army (Far less high tech) all sort of “who knew we had this” things and gadgets appeared in 2003.
18
posted on
03/11/2008 8:29:19 AM PDT
by
Red6
(Come and take it.)
To: jerod
All - this has been planned for years.
19
posted on
03/11/2008 8:30:10 AM PDT
by
Red6
(Come and take it.)
To: Resolute Conservative
I wonder what has replaced it that we have not seen yet? You've seen it. The B-2, JSF, and the F-22. Along with stand-off precision weapons.
20
posted on
03/11/2008 8:30:32 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: RobRoy
The way the f117 is stealthy is the REDIRECTION of the reflection.
Yes, it reflects sound, and it reflects radar, but just not back to the source.
That’s why it has all those funky angular planes on it. In the book “Skunkworks”, they said it was ironic that the math/geometry behind this approach has been around for a LONG time, and was discovered by a Russian mathematician.
21
posted on
03/11/2008 8:30:36 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: varyouga
There’s not much space needed - the F22 should have replaced all of the aging and brittle F-15 - now that there isn’t enough funds to even buy a third of what is needed...
and the F-35 - who knows if and when...
22
posted on
03/11/2008 8:30:45 AM PDT
by
Rummenigge
(there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: RobRoy
I remember buying a model of it on September 26, 1985 in Harold Fuchs Hobby Shop while we were still denying their existence. What does the F-117 and an Ovation Guitar have in common.
23
posted on
03/11/2008 8:31:21 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Joiseydude
I remember when Jimmie Carter revealed the existence of stealth aircraft. (Stupid POS!)
24
posted on
03/11/2008 8:32:09 AM PDT
by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: RobRoy
Or are you implying that F117s dont reflect sound? I doubt they reflect much sound back to the source. Propagation is propagation.
25
posted on
03/11/2008 8:32:35 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: MrB
Dont tell me that they would fly into the F-117s because their sonar wouldn't bounce back!
To: SampleMan
The F-117 was flying a decade before we ever saw it. There are things in development we won’t see for another decade.
To: Joiseydude
Here is a recently unclassified photo of the F-117's replacement, the F-22:

;^)
28
posted on
03/11/2008 8:34:00 AM PDT
by
BullDog108
(A Smith & Wesson beats four aces)
To: Resolute Conservative
I wonder what has replaced it that we have not seen yet?
29
posted on
03/11/2008 8:35:50 AM PDT
by
Polybius
To: taxcontrol
Yeppers.
The sonar bounced, but not “back”, effectively fooling the bat into assuming there was nothing there to reflect off.
30
posted on
03/11/2008 8:36:33 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Rummenigge
The F35 was designed as a future low-cost and more versatile alternative to the F22.
I'm not sure how successful they were in keeping manufacturing costs down. Most of the cost is research so building many of them would drop the unit price significantly.
31
posted on
03/11/2008 8:37:08 AM PDT
by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: Joiseydude
My best friend’s wife has an American flag that was in the cockpit during the first public flight of this airplane. The late BG Tony Tolin was both the vice commander and commander, 4450th Tactical Group, 37th Tactical Fighter Wing, Tonopah Test Range, Nev. July 1987 - August 1990 and made the flight and gave it to the couple out of friendship.
To: MrB
Wow, now the “sick” side of me wants to see that on video. Quite concisely states the problem with over reliance on one system, wouldn’t you say?
To: massgopguy
>>What does the F-117 and an Ovation Guitar have in common.<<
Got me. What?
34
posted on
03/11/2008 8:41:18 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
To: massgopguy
What does the F-117 and an Ovation Guitar have in commonNeither can fly straight w/out a lot of help.
To: MrB
Kelly Johnson and those guys were awesome engineers and “out of the box” thinkers. Going to be hard if not impossible to replace them as the retire and/or pass.
To: Resolute Conservative
The F-117 was flying a decade before we ever saw it. There are things in development we wont see for another decade. The F-117 is being retired because it is old, expensive to maintain, and inferior to the JSF. It never had any air-air capability, which was a drawback.
Most programs are generally in the open, with certain aspects kept secret. e.g. the B-2 and F-22. Only a very few become operational without general knowledge, e.g. the U-2 and the F-117.
But its fun to speculate. Perhaps we captured a Klingon cloaking device ;-)
37
posted on
03/11/2008 8:44:45 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: MrB
Well that is just confusing. Radar doesn’t bounce off a piece of paper but sound does. And if you hang a piece of paper or steel in the air at a 45 degree to a bat’s travel, he will still “see” it.
A thing can absorb radar but not sound, just as a thing can stop light but not x-rays.
38
posted on
03/11/2008 8:44:50 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
To: Resolute Conservative
People would never believe how far that airplane was flown under the cover of darkness.
To: Resolute Conservative
"....I wonder what is being designed in the last few years that is flying out of Groom Lake and other areas that we havent seen yet...."
Hmmmm.....something like these, maybe?


40
posted on
03/11/2008 8:46:29 AM PDT
by
Renfield
(Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
To: Rummenigge
They would have enough to fund 5 more F22’s if Clinton, and his RINO kiss-butts, had closed down a pork barrel AFB instead of George, IMO.
41
posted on
03/11/2008 8:47:24 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(I'm not worried anymore. I read Obama's "Blueprint for Change".)
To: Resolute Conservative; MrB
To: papasmurf
if it WAS possible to cut all the bacon - wich country wouldn’t be much better of ?
I guess the US are still a good example in that book.
43
posted on
03/11/2008 8:49:58 AM PDT
by
Rummenigge
(there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: Joiseydude
I like the story that they gave it the F (fighter) designation in order to attract the best pilots who didnt want to fly Bs (bombers) which is what the F-117 actually is.
44
posted on
03/11/2008 8:56:46 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(Where are they hiding Obama’s white half?)
To: Resolute Conservative
Groom lake is shut down for aircraft development. They have moved to Utah and White Sands.
45
posted on
03/11/2008 8:57:40 AM PDT
by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: BullDog108
Now that’s funny right there.
46
posted on
03/11/2008 8:58:12 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(Obama: NOT the next JFK. He is the NEXT STALIN!!!! Wake up America!!!)
To: jerod
They’ve been retiring F-177’s for some time now. This is apparently the last one.
47
posted on
03/11/2008 8:58:14 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
To: RobRoy
Deflecting sound waves was kind of a side property (though Stealth is more than just RADAR observability). The dead bats suggested that a similar approach would be possible to defeat SONAR. Lockheed built the SEA SHADOW as a proof of concept. So far as we know, it never went further than that.
48
posted on
03/11/2008 9:02:13 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
To: SampleMan
49
posted on
03/11/2008 9:09:48 AM PDT
by
Stonewall Jackson
(Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory. - George Patton)
To: Tallguy
So the implication then is that the dead bat thing is legit?
50
posted on
03/11/2008 9:10:12 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson