Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain Addresses Terri Schiavo Debate After Barack Obama's Flip-Flop
Life News ^ | 3/12/08 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/12/2008 4:20:51 PM PDT by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Presidential candidate John McCain addressed the debate over Terri Schiavo's euthanasia death but added little to his position other than to call the ordeal "very sad." His comments are the first since Barack Obama came under intense criticism saying he regretted supporting a bill to help her family prevent her ex-husband from killing her.

McCain addressed the debate over the disabled woman during a campaign stop last week the corporate headquarters of Chick-fil-A restaurant.

In a brief news conference following the event, Baptist Press reports that McCain called the entire situation relating to Terri "very sad" and a "great American tragedy."

"It's very sad when you see a situation such as this, it's very sad," McCain explained.

"I think just by looking at the situation it was a terrible situation and one that probably the state should have handled in retrospect," he added, according to Baptist Press. "[I]t was a very sad, sad situation and moved all of us who are -- and the plight of this situation moved every American."

Last month, Barack Obama said during a Democratic presidential debate that his biggest mistake was siding with a unanimous Senate to help save Terri Schiavo.

“It wasn't something I was comfortable with, but it was not something that I stood on the floor and stopped,” Obama said.

“And I think that was a mistake, and I think the American people understood that was a mistake. And as a constitutional law professor, I knew better,” he added.

It was the second time Obama said he regretted supporting the bill to help the Schindler family top the painful starvation and dehydration death.

Terri Schiavo's family and pro-life groups soundly condemned the statement.

"Everyone with a disability, or who knows someone with a disability, should be outraged that a potential US president would so callously reject his own action taken in favor of life over death," Terri's father Robert Schindler told LifeNews.com.

"As a country, we should all be distressed that doing the right thing suddenly becomes a 'mistake' when one poll later showed it to be unpopular," Schindler said. "That isn't leadership; it's pandering to popular prejudices."

In March 2005, just weeks before Terri died from a painful 14-day starvation and dehydration death, Congress approved legislation allowing her family to take its case from state courts to federal courts in an effort to stop the euthanasia from proceeding.

Terri was not on any artificial breathing apparatus and only required a feeding tube to eat and drink. Her family had filed a lawsuit against her former husband to allow them to care for her and give her proper medical and rehabilitative care.

The Senate unanimously approved a compromise bill, which the House eventually supported on a lopsided bipartisan vote and President Bush signed, to help the disabled woman.

Related web sites:
Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation - http://www.terrisfight.org



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: johnmccain; moralabsolutes; nobama; prolife; terrischaivo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last
"As a country, we should all be distressed that doing the right thing suddenly becomes a 'mistake' when one poll later showed it to be unpopular," Schindler said. "That isn't leadership; it's pandering to popular prejudices."

Very true.

1 posted on 03/12/2008 4:20:52 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 03/12/2008 4:21:32 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter; BykrBayb; bjs1779; Sun

Ping


3 posted on 03/12/2008 4:22:39 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
“It wasn't something I was comfortable with, but it was not something that I stood on the floor and stopped,” Obama said. “And I think that was a mistake, . . .

He makes a lot of mistakes.
4 posted on 03/12/2008 4:27:03 PM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"[I]t was a very sad, sad situation and moved all of us who are -- and the plight of this situation moved every American."

Actually it only moved half of us.

5 posted on 03/12/2008 4:32:02 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park". Watching the Rat Fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
McCain: "...it was a terrible situation and one that probably the state should have handled ..."

And that means, what?

6 posted on 03/12/2008 4:33:13 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Are you sick of hearing at-the-end-of-the-day?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman; 8mmMauser; floriduh voter; BykrBayb; bjs1779; Sun; Coleus; narses; cpforlife.org; ...
"[I]t was a very sad, sad situation and moved all of us who are -- and the plight of this situation moved every American."

Actually it only moved half of us.

We are well aware that some people who consider themselves conservative are totally opposed to the pro-life movement.

7 posted on 03/12/2008 4:37:05 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I think he means that Jeb Bush should have done job and protected Terri as prescribed by the Florida Constitution.


8 posted on 03/12/2008 4:40:57 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I agree. This situation the federal govt had no business in it. As sad as it was, it should have remained a local issue. I am a conservative and I thought that the federal govt should have stayed out of it because of Federalism.


9 posted on 03/12/2008 4:46:56 PM PDT by Perdogg (Reagan would have never said "She's my girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
We are well aware that some people who consider themselves conservative are totally opposed to the pro-life movement.

And that is a shame.

10 posted on 03/12/2008 4:48:19 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park". Watching the Rat Fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I agree. This situation the federal govt had no business in it. As sad as it was, it should have remained a local issue. I am a conservative and I thought that the federal govt should have stayed out of it because of Federalism.

So you don't believe it's the federal government's responsibility to protect Fifth Amendment rights?

11 posted on 03/12/2008 4:51:46 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

She had due process, at the State level where it was appropriate.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe he should have turned Teri over to her parents, but I don’t believe it was an issue for the Federal govt.


12 posted on 03/12/2008 5:05:13 PM PDT by Perdogg (Reagan would have never said "She's my girl")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

A person CANNOT be put to death without a grand jury indictment.


13 posted on 03/12/2008 5:06:46 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

Yes. He was a lecturer, not a professor. Then again, he was probably misquoted - you know how these articles are.


14 posted on 03/12/2008 5:11:06 PM PDT by JavaJumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Perdogg
My objection is the way he phrased it, so you don't quite know what he means and that's just how he wants it. Personally I think that when someone decides to starve an innocent person to death, the state or the federal govt or whosoever should step in and save her. Anyone at all who has the power to intervene, should do so. And anyone who arguably might have the power. Save her first. Argue later. Defend an innocent life first. Discuss principles of statecraft later.
15 posted on 03/12/2008 5:12:53 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Are you sick of hearing at-the-end-of-the-day?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I agree with you COMPLETELY!


16 posted on 03/12/2008 5:13:58 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; All
With all due respect to Terri Schiavo and her supporters, I have a somewhat harsh question. If Florida's majority voters think that Florida's Court handled Terri's case improperly, has there been any initiative by the majority voters to change the state's code so that similar incidents are avoided in the future?

For the record, I think that Terri's case could have been handled more compassionately. Jefferson put it this way in general.

"It is not honorable to take a mere legal advantage, when it happens to be contrary to justice." --Thomas Jefferson: Opinion on Debts due to Soldiers, 1790. ME 3:25

17 posted on 03/12/2008 5:33:36 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Untrue—many states don’t even use grand juries anymore.


18 posted on 03/12/2008 5:48:05 PM PDT by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Young Scholar; wagglebee
A person CANNOT be put to death without a grand jury indictment.

Untrue—many states don’t even use grand juries anymore.

But Florida, the state we are currently discussing in the matters of Schindler v Schiavo and Bush v Schiavo, does.

19 posted on 03/12/2008 6:41:53 PM PDT by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
What bewilders me is why few if any politicians have put forth arguments that should have been unobjectionable: there were enough discrepancies in Michael's actions since 1993, including his conhabition with and apparent engagement to Ms. Centonze, that his continued authority should have been contingent upon--at absolute minimum--his answering questions about them under oath.

To suggest that a husband should be allowed to move in with another woman, father two children by her, and pledge to marry her, without forfeiting authority over his wife, is to make a mockery of marriage. Can any reasonable person deny that?

20 posted on 03/12/2008 7:45:31 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson