Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain, Soros and the New “Global Order”
Family Security Matters ^ | 13 Mar 2008 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 03/15/2008 7:21:45 AM PDT by BGHater

It’s not the kind of endorsement that a Republican presidential candidate should welcome. But former Clinton State Department official and alleged Russian dupe Strobe Talbott says that Senator John McCain and Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are all “moderate pragmatists” in foreign policy “with the demonstrated ability to reach across party lines.”

This is “good news,” says Talbott, who is an advocate of world government.

Can our media stop talking about race, sex and gender long enough to examine whether the American people will be given a choice or an echo on foreign policy issues this November?

The praise of McCain and the Democratic candidates is included in a Washington Examiner “power profile” of Talbott by Patty Reinert, who was apparently unaware that Talbott’s improper dealings with Russian officials while he was in the Clinton Administration are detailed in the explosive new book, Comrade J. Based on the revelations of a top Russian spy, Sergei Tretyakov, the book charges that Talbott was a trusted contact of the Russian intelligence service and that his close relationship with a Russian official alarmed the FBI.

The major media’s failure to report on Tretyakov’s blockbuster charges against Talbott is why the Reinert puff piece could be published in the first place. This disgraceful piece of journalism quotes a close Talbott friend, New York Times reporter Steven Weisman, as saying, “There’s just a sweetness about him. Strobe is sweet.”

This is what passes for scrutiny into someone who is at the center of one of the biggest State Department scandals in history and continues to have a major influence on the development of U.S. foreign policy.

Another of Talbott’s close friends, named in the article, is Walter Isaacson of the Aspen Institute and formerly of Time magazine. It was at Time that Talbott penned a column promoting world government as the solution to mankind’s problems. Talbott and his parents were members of the World Federalist Movement. They believe U.S. sovereignty should be submerged into a world federation. It is shocking that someone with these views could become a top State Department official. But Talbott and Bill Clinton were close friends and Rhodes Scholars together. Talbott’s main booster in the U.S. Senate was Republican Senator Richard Lugar, another Rhodes Scholar.

Talbott, now head of the liberal Brookings Institution, “expects Brookings’ scholars to play a significant role in shaping America’s next move on the world stage, whether the next president is Republican or Democrat,” the Examiner article reveals.

If John McCain wants to reassure conservatives about his candidacy, he should issue a statement saying he will have nothing to do with Talbott if or when he becomes president. To his credit, McCain voted against Talbott when he was up for high-level positions in the Clinton State Department and called his views on the old Soviet Union naïve and foolish. But Talbott has apparently forgotten about all of this and now wants and expects to have major influence on a McCain presidency.

Talbott has written his own book, The Great Experiment, outlining his vision of a New World Order in which the authority of global institutions like the United Nations is greatly enhanced and expanded. For his part, McCain has proposed a new “Global Order of Peace,” enforced by a “global League of Democracies.” Both visions should be examined in detail.

Law of the Sea

Talbott, a foreign policy adviser to Hillary Clinton who has praised Barack Obama’s views on global issues, has an obvious disagreement with McCain about how long to stay in Iraq. But their views on other international matters seem to converge.

Talbott’s Brookings Institution has sponsored appearances by Talbott’s good friend, Senator Lugar, in order to promote Senate ratification of the U.N.’s Law of the Sea Treaty. McCain had supported the treaty before he told conservative bloggers last year, when he was running for president and trying to garner conservative support, that he was against it. Since then, his Senate office has told constituents that he supports the pact but will approach ratification with an open mind.

The Washington Times reports that, during recent remarks to the conservative Council for National Policy (CNP), McCain was again ambiguous. According to the Times, in its account of his CNP remarks, “On the proposed Law of the Seas [sic] Treaty that President Bush supports and that conservatives generally oppose, Mr. McCain split the difference, saying the treaty as proposed surrenders ‘way too much’ of America’s sovereignty, but it needs to be renegotiated because international law needs ‘coherence’ in this area.”

You can listen to McCain’s remarks here. The transcript shows that McCain was asked for his clear and unequivocal position and that he replied: “I think it has to be renegotiated. I think there’s some vulnerabilities associated with it. I think all of us would like to see coherence as some countries claim three miles [as a territorial limit], some 200 miles, some etc. Clearly, there has to be some coherence. But I’m afraid that this treaty gives up too much of America’s sovereignty…”

Interrupted by applause at this point, McCain said, “I’m glad to hear your response but I think you would agree that some coherence concerning the use of the oceans, the seas, etc. is a good thing. It’s just that this isn’t the right solution to it.”

His latest position seems to be that he wants the treaty changed. It leaves him some wiggle room to vote for the pact if it is amended in some way. This won’t be enough to satisfy security-minded conservatives, who want it rejected outright. The pact turns oil, gas and mineral resources over to a U.N. body known as the International Seabed Authority and would subject the actions of the U.S. Navy to second-guessing by nations filing claims before an International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

The NAFTA Controversy

On another critical issue, McCain has emerged as a vocal proponent of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), despite the fact that one of its major supporters, Robert A. Pastor, admits that, in one key respect, it has been a colossal failure.

Pastor, a Democrat who runs the Center for North American Studies at American University, says that NAFTA has resulted in economic integration and increased trade but has “fueled immigration by encouraging foreign investment near the U.S.-Mexican border, which in turn serves as a magnet for workers in central and southern Mexico.” He says that many of the Mexicans who don’t find jobs in northern Mexico are coming into the U.S. Hence, he admits, our illegal immigration problem is being exacerbated by NAFTA.

Pastor, who has advised every Democratic presidential candidate since 1976, proposes to “fix” NAFTA through a $200-billion North American Investment Fund “to close the income gap between Mexico and its northern neighbors, because that is the only way to stop immigration and establish a community.” In other words, we pay them to stay home. Pastor opposes a border fence to keep them out.

Pastor’s “community” is the “North American Community,” in which the three countries have a common security perimeter, a common external tariff, and “North American institutions” to work on such issues as transportation, infrastructure and education. Critics think that, with good reason, this amounts to a proposed North American Union. The Bush Administration’s secretive Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP) is facilitating this process and Mexican trucks are now traveling over U.S. highways, supposedly in compliance with NAFTA, despite a Congressional vote against such a program.

McCain has not spoken out against any of this. What’s more, the use of Dr. Juan Hernandez as his Hispanic outreach director speaks volumes. Hernandez ran the Office for Mexicans Abroad in the Mexican government of Vicente Fox. His book, The New American Pioneers: Why Are We Afraid of Mexican Immigrants?, praises Pastor’s financial bailout plan for Mexico.

The Democrats’ threat to withdraw from the pact is designed to force changes in the agreement so that it covers matters involving environmental protection and worker rights. This would, of course, lead to the specter of Pastor’s “North American institutions” interfering in even more of the domestic and social affairs of the three NAFTA nations.

For his part, McCain’s blanket support of NAFTA is consistent with his previous advocacy of accommodating the demands of illegal aliens through what is called “comprehensive immigration reform.” His foreign policy spokesman, Randy Scheunemann, has even been quoted as saying that Democratic calls to renegotiate NAFTA are “protectionist” and “unilateralist” and that it’s “cowboy diplomacy” to talk about “reopening an agreement that was passed over a decade ago with strong bipartisan support...”

But that is the point – it was an agreement, not a treaty, because President Clinton didn’t have the two-thirds necessary to get it passed in the Senate. He circumvented the constitutional process. As such, Congress can repeal it with simple majorities. That’s the issue the media should be covering.

The Democrats are correct that the U.S. can withdraw from it. Article 2205 of the agreement, “Withdrawal,” declares, “A Party may withdraw from this Agreement six months after it provides written notice of withdrawal to the other Parties. If a Party withdraws, the Agreement shall remain in force for the remaining Parties.”

A Bribe for Canada

But McCain is now insisting that NAFTA cannot be rejected because it is necessary to win the global war on terror. At a campaign event at the headquarters of the Dell computer company in Round Rock, Texas, McCain said that we need the agreement so Canada will keep its troops in Afghanistan.

McCain said, “We need our Canadian friends and we need their continued support in Afghanistan. So what do we do? The two Democratic candidates for president say that they’re going to unilaterally abrogate the North America Free Trade Agreement. Our biggest trading partner, they made a solemn agreement with, they’re going to unilaterally abrogate that. Now how do you think the Canadian people are going to react to that?’’

But the notion of this agreement, which was passed in 1993, being in any way “solemn” or connected to the war in Afghanistan is quite a stretch.

McCain makes the valid point that national security and trade issues are “interconnected with each other.” But the obvious connection between trade and security, in regard to NAFTA, lies in the fact that illegal aliens, including possible terrorists, are crossing the border from Mexico into the U.S.

NATO and the New World Order

Another Clinton initiative that McCain embraces is NATO expansion. Clinton transformed NATO from a defensive alliance against the Soviet empire into an offensive military force without submitting a new NATO treaty for ratification to the Senate. Nevertheless, McCain voted for Clinton’s war through NATO in the former Yugoslavia and now favors independence for Kosovo, a Serbian province, as an outcome of this illegal war. The war became illegal when the House refused to authorize it under the War Powers Act.

“The future of NATO lies not only in expanding its membership, transforming its mission, and deepening its commitments. It lies also in cooperating with states far from our shores,” says McCain. In a recent statement urging a new “Global Order of Peace,” McCain has called for a new “global League of Democracies – one that would have NATO members at its core – dedicated to the defense and advancement of global democratic principles.” McCain made his first pitch for such a new international organization in 2007 before the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in Stanford, California.

“It could act where the UN fails to act, to relieve human suffering in places like Darfur,” McCain says. “This League of Democracies would not supplant the United Nations or other international organizations. It would complement them,” he explains.

The George Soros Connection

While it may sound good in theory, a “Democracy Coalition Project” was actually started in June of 2002 and it has been run by the political left, most of them former Clinton officials. Seed money and original sponsorship were provided by the George Soros-funded Open Society Institute. Key officials include Morton Halperin, the director of Soros’s Open Society Institute Washington office, and former Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who served as Strobe Talbott’s boss. Halperin also worked under Albright at State.

If McCain is promoting a Soros-funded project or idea, it would not be the first time. World Net Daily and others have noted evidence that McCain’s “Reform Institute” also received funds from Soros. Hernandez is a senior fellow there.

Could Soros, the billionaire financial manipulator, be in a position to call the shots no matter who is elected in the fall?

It is certainly relevant and significant that Talbott’s book The Great Experiment identifies Soros, one of the “visitors to my office” when he was in the Clinton State Department, as one of his advisers on issues like NATO. Talbott also thanks Soros in the acknowledgements section of his book.

Soros wrote Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO, back in 1993. He figured that NATO could take on the military responsibilities of the New World Order until the U.N. was ready to do the job.

It sounds a lot like the McCain plan.

No wonder Talbott is pleased with our “choices” this fall.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; globalism; mccain; nafta; nato; newworldorder; pragmatists; rmsp; soros; strobetalbott

1 posted on 03/15/2008 7:21:46 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Main street McQueeg.


2 posted on 03/15/2008 7:23:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
These are more reasons of a growing list as to why Conservatives need to recognize the increasingly socialist GOP and socialist Democrat party have merged into one party with the same political ideology. The only way Conservatives will have their views represented is by leaving the GOP and uniting under a Conservative party.
3 posted on 03/15/2008 7:30:32 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

It just gets scarier and scarier.


4 posted on 03/15/2008 7:36:06 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The danger of McCain is evident in the head bobbing of the party lapdogs so mesmerized by the (R) that they don’t even recognize that it increasingly represents everything the (D) stands for.


5 posted on 03/15/2008 7:36:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

He’s almost.... messianic. In a RINO sort of way.


6 posted on 03/15/2008 7:38:10 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

If voting could actually change anything it would be a capital crime.


7 posted on 03/15/2008 7:38:42 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The danger of McCain is evident in the head bobbing of the party lapdogs so mesmerized by the (R) that they don’t even recognize that it increasingly represents everything the (D) stands for.

Exactly. The GOP's twisted logic is to stop socialism by appeasing socialists.
8 posted on 03/15/2008 7:38:49 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Strobe is the Clinton advisor who advocates the elimination of national borders. Is there a special name for this particular advocacy?


9 posted on 03/15/2008 7:41:03 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily

“globalism”.


10 posted on 03/15/2008 7:42:30 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: abclily
Treason


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

11 posted on 03/15/2008 7:44:11 AM PDT by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: detective
Before prostitutians go for world order failure, they should try it on their own skin, smaller scale: Invite one homeless, one working family, one actor's family (insert many others) and put them up in their palatial home, have one joint account and each one will work according to their abilities and take food and money according to their needs. Please report 2 months later.
12 posted on 03/15/2008 7:44:22 AM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
We could run a generic D/R symbol behind his name, that would make it more factual and true to life. McLaime has been pandering to Conservatives lately, begging us to vote for him, because he knows he can't win without us now. But if we do, we can guarantee that after he takes the position, he will never look at us again. He will do what he has done to us his entire career. All I can say is SUCKER!
13 posted on 03/15/2008 7:47:03 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....Viva El Presidente! "I'm not prejudice, I hate everybody the same.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Could Soros, the billionaire financial manipulator, be in a position to call the shots no matter who is elected in the fall? ...... yes. This election will be all about economy and Iraq; I'm more concerned about American Sovereignty. The public will never be able to get their intellect and imagination around this one until it's too late. The sky really is falling!
14 posted on 03/15/2008 7:48:10 AM PDT by Nanny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nanny7

We lose 3 ways. Wonderful!


15 posted on 03/15/2008 7:50:34 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Juan McCain....Viva El Presidente! "I'm not prejudice, I hate everybody the same.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

If Hillary Clinton switched parties today there would be a lot of laughter at her attempt but I garantee that within a week, threads promoting her as better than any democrat would start to appear.


16 posted on 03/15/2008 7:51:28 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I agree. (well, not with the (sarc) “wonderful”) The left loves a crisis!


18 posted on 03/15/2008 7:56:16 AM PDT by Nanny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

McCain’s bought into the global warming scam, he’s ready and willing to sign away American sovereignty using that as a rationale.


19 posted on 03/15/2008 8:05:12 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
McCain, Soros and the New “Global Order”

I am sick and tired of "New World Order", "Global Older", McCains, Clintons and Bushes.

Since the Ronald Reagan Presidency our country is going down the drain.

If you disagree just compare America of 1988 to Amerika of 2008.

20 posted on 03/15/2008 8:10:59 AM PDT by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anticommie

Yep, the frog is simmering comfortably...


21 posted on 03/15/2008 8:23:32 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom ("My advice: Quit supporting the party that is symbolized by an ass." Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

you got that right! I will no longer support a government of these two parties.


22 posted on 03/15/2008 8:26:16 AM PDT by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Warren Buffett's shill: Mrs. Clinton.
George soros' shill: John McCain.

Donald Trump, therefore, will be the deciding factor of whom will be selected the next president.

23 posted on 03/15/2008 8:27:54 AM PDT by kcm.org
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
McCain’s bought into the global warming scam, he’s ready and willing to sign away American sovereignty using that as a rationale.

Yep, this is the worst part of being the RHINO.

The only significant difference between McCain and Hildebeast agenda is that he plans to be in Iraq 100 years, Hildebeast unspecified amount of time less.

That's why McCain is going to lose election ('It's the economy stupid' mantra again)

24 posted on 03/15/2008 8:34:20 AM PDT by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: glide625
you got that right! I will no longer support a government of these two parties.

I completely agree with you!

25 posted on 03/15/2008 8:36:41 AM PDT by alicewonders (I'm a conservative, and I'm hated by the GOP & the Dems - I must be doing something right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

You are right on.

After this November election, all conservatives and moderates (REAL moderates, not cryptolibs like McCain or Bush) need to unite a form a new political party from the ground up - starting with local elections.

If anyone wants to start the ball rolling, I’m ready.


26 posted on 03/15/2008 9:28:21 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Nope, The GOPs aim now is to legitimize Socialism, but be the “Chosen Elites” that bring it into being, once and for all. I guess part of the plan has always been to infiltrate both party upper-eschalon so that no matter who gets the nod, the Upper-Class get the goods. The problem is, Islamofacism. Strobby will be one of the first in line to get a deep haircut.
27 posted on 03/15/2008 9:32:23 AM PDT by Shady (The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
The only way Conservatives will have their views represented is by leaving the GOP and uniting under a Conservative party.

Dittoes.

28 posted on 03/15/2008 10:46:42 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Huckaboob will never be Vice President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
If Hillary Clinton switched parties today there would be a lot of laughter at her attempt but I garantee that within a week, threads promoting her as better than any democrat would start to appear.

At this point in time, you could put a hot, steaming plate of excrement in front of most members of the GOP, tell them that's their candidate for President and they'd dutifully vote for it, all the while insisting that he was the very best man for the job.

29 posted on 03/15/2008 10:50:50 AM PDT by E. Cartman (Huckaboob will never be Vice President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The Republicans will claim valuable Democratic talking points this week while McCain is in Europe pushing his positions in global warming and carbon credit trading schemes. The presumed Republican presidential candidate is the almost perfect Trojan Horse the Republican Party has sought to further a globalist agenda with slightly differing stances of the Democrats globalist candidates. Either way, the USA is pushed further into past memory.


30 posted on 03/15/2008 12:32:12 PM PDT by backtothestreets (My bologna has a first name, it's J-O-R-G-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

bttt


31 posted on 03/15/2008 2:06:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Suprise, suprise. Repeal the 17th Amendment. Senators suck eggs.


32 posted on 03/15/2008 2:13:17 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (No mas Juan "Traitor Rat" McAmnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sal

bump for me to find tomorrow.


33 posted on 03/15/2008 7:47:07 PM PDT by Sal (We The People ARE the government. We elect pols as our servants, not our masters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

I’ve wondered if anyone else is thinking along these lines. There’s an interesting article at techcentralstation.com called Splinter States. I think you can see it at http://tcsdaily.com/Article.aspx?id=022508B


34 posted on 03/16/2008 2:22:04 PM PDT by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson