Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Superdelegates should reflect voters' will
Politico ^ | March 16, 2008 | Patrick O'Connor

Posted on 03/16/2008 6:20:07 PM PDT by cdchik123

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) reiterated her position Sunday that superdelegates should reflect the will of voters in the Democratic nominating process — a nod to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), whose campaign is making the same case.

“If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic Party,” Pelosi said in a pretaped interview with ABC’s “This Week.”

A pair of Obama surrogates made the same case.

On CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said, “I think the superdelegates, in the end, will ratify the will of the people and the pledged delegates.”

And former Sen. Bill Bradley (D-N.J.) went even further on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” where he suggested superdelegates who buck their constituents may face a primary fight during the next election.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008dncconvention; civilwar; hillary; nobama; obama; pelosi; superdelegates

1 posted on 03/16/2008 6:20:08 PM PDT by cdchik123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Then why have them?

We know.


2 posted on 03/16/2008 6:22:16 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

What’s the point of having superdelegates, then?

Superdelegates were created to make sure the “voter’s will” wasn’t all wrong, like it was in 1972.


3 posted on 03/16/2008 6:22:26 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Triumph of the Will, eh Nancy?


4 posted on 03/16/2008 6:22:56 PM PDT by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) reiterated her position Sunday that superdelegates should reflect the will of voters in the Democratic nominating process

Then why have them at all?

5 posted on 03/16/2008 6:22:59 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
If superdelegates are only suppoled to reflect the will of the people, why is there a need for superdelegates?
6 posted on 03/16/2008 6:23:36 PM PDT by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance. Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Panzerlied

Nancy better watch out. All the botox in the world won’t save her from the Clintoon payback.


7 posted on 03/16/2008 6:24:48 PM PDT by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

“Pelosi (D-Calif.) reiterated her position Sunday that superdelegates should reflect the will of voters”

ROTFLMAO! Big time! During clintoon impeachment, the RATS position was “vote your conscience.”


8 posted on 03/16/2008 6:24:48 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

Pelosi is the DNC chairwoman i believe. I think she helps decides the final rules or something. If she is ever called on to “work out a deal” like I have read, it’s pretty obvious she is in the tank for Obama.


9 posted on 03/16/2008 6:25:03 PM PDT by cdchik123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

If super delegates must reflect the will of the people, why have them?


10 posted on 03/16/2008 6:25:06 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

This Nomination Process is loaded with ironies for Dem!!!

All their lives these people have played race and gender cards against their opponents and now they are playing it against each other.

When the ‘Ebony vs Ovary’ battle is over, the ELITISTS respresented by Super Delegates would decide the results! That’s what Dems are.....with all the talk about ‘little guys’, they have always been and will always be LIBERAL ELITISTS who want to control everything sitting comfortably in their Drachas.


11 posted on 03/16/2008 6:25:13 PM PDT by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

One can only imagine the political hay the Democrats would make if the Republicans had a system of “superdelegates” and said superdelegates were to tilt the nomination away from the popular vote. Of course, the Dhimmicrats could get away with exactly that because the Republicans lack the political killer instinct to use it against them.


12 posted on 03/16/2008 6:25:18 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("a wee bit silly." -Lord Trimble on Hillary Clinton's claim of foreign policy "experience".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
Rats are really slooow on the uptake. They're rapidly sealing their fate with both hands.

Obama is over but he'll still take the delegate count. He can't win now for love or money. Hillary is their only chance but they hate the Clintons so bad that they won't swing the nomination to her.

They really have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Like it was preordained or sumpin'.

Here's hoping McCain has long coat tails 'cuz the rats will have none.

13 posted on 03/16/2008 6:33:11 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
In any ordinary election year I would not really care about what the Democrat Party is doing about delegates to their National Convention.

Frankly I am only interested in getting/keeping the Clintons out of power after what has been done during the 90s.

Putting down this imbecile Obama to the point where Hillary is viewed as more favorable is IMO playing with fire.

Let the Democrats kick Hillary's ass, and then we all in “congress” can work to belittle Obama and “our” own imbecile McCain.

Lets get the Clintons out on a rail.

How tough of an agenda is that to appreciate?

14 posted on 03/16/2008 6:34:40 PM PDT by Radix (Sarcasm? Yeah we got that too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

When has a democrat ever reflected VOTERS WILL ?


15 posted on 03/16/2008 6:40:33 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (http://eaglecooler.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
...the will of voters...

Including the dead ones?

16 posted on 03/16/2008 6:41:30 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (I have great faith in the American people. I have no faith in the American government, however.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

And if Hillary were winning the popular vote, she would say exactly the opposite.


17 posted on 03/16/2008 6:44:19 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

I disagree. I should think the superdelegates are intended to step in when something comes to light late in the nominating process like oh, say, one of the contenders turns out to be a race baiting black supremacist.


18 posted on 03/16/2008 6:49:59 PM PDT by ichabod1 ("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123; All

And they want to be in charge of my health care?


19 posted on 03/16/2008 6:50:40 PM PDT by JavaJumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

That’s the problem with the democrat party. It is a coalition of “Groups” that really don’t like each other very much. It’s not that hard to get them to eat each other. This is the first thing that’s given me any hope for the fall, since we’re running with a (Mc)lame candidate.


20 posted on 03/16/2008 6:51:59 PM PDT by ichabod1 ("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123

I agree and urge every Democrat Superdelegate to vote for Barry Fitzgerald Obama.


21 posted on 03/16/2008 6:52:33 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: telebob
If Obama has the most delegates and they give the nomination to Shrillary anyway, the Democrats are going to be in a world of hurt.

Not only will the blacks riot and destroy their cities, but they won't vote for Shrillary and McCain will win.

Words cannot express how amusing this all is. :)

22 posted on 03/16/2008 6:54:56 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
"If Obama has the most delegates and they give the nomination to Shrillary anyway, the Democrats are going to be in a world of hurt."

The rats are down to no good choices. Anyway they play it now, they're doomed.

Check and mate...

23 posted on 03/16/2008 7:17:48 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: telebob

Combined ticket.


24 posted on 03/16/2008 7:34:14 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Never happen.


25 posted on 03/16/2008 7:40:36 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: umgud

If super delegates must reflect the will of the people, why have them?..... BECAUSE.......

26 posted on 03/16/2008 8:08:11 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
All their lives these people have played race and gender cards against their opponents and now they are playing it against each other.

Sprinkle in the count all the disenfranchised votes and we have the D'Rat perfect storm trifecta!

27 posted on 03/16/2008 8:16:33 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

LOL! Exactly right. Hildabeast has already accused Obama in Nevada, Texas Caucuses, and MI and FL votes, of disenfranchizing voters.

Obama needs to accuse her of ‘Vote Suppression’ and we are there! ;o)


28 posted on 03/16/2008 8:27:01 PM PDT by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1
"I disagree. I should think the superdelegates are intended to step in when something comes to light late in the nominating process like oh, say, one of the contenders turns out to be a race baiting black supremacist. "

I agree with your logic, according to my understanding of the superdelegate concept. The superdelegates ( if the convention were today) SHOULD support thunderthighs. If they do, then watch the sh*t hit the fan!

29 posted on 03/16/2008 10:04:29 PM PDT by matthew fuller (United We Stand- Diversified We Fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
"Combined ticket. "

That would be just like putting two cats in a large suitcase and closing it.

30 posted on 03/16/2008 10:10:48 PM PDT by matthew fuller (United We Stand- Diversified We Fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller
That [ a combined ticket] would be just like putting two cats in a large suitcase and closing it.

Um ... looks more to me like putting a scorpion and a butterfly in the same bottle. But it won't happen. Obama has already refused the #2 spot, and he surely knows that in putting Hitlery as #2 he would be signing his own death warrant.

I'm hoping for a deadlocked convention with Al Gore as the last minute Idiot on the White (non flatulant) Horse. Mass abstention by blacks and women follows.

31 posted on 03/17/2008 12:16:02 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: telebob

Never happen.

We had best hope that is correct.
But, we really do not know at this point.


32 posted on 03/17/2008 6:30:13 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

No, but we can make an educated guess and put our money down. My money’s on ‘Never happen’.


33 posted on 03/17/2008 7:37:19 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

No, but we can make an educated guess and put our money down. My money’s on ‘Never happen’.


34 posted on 03/17/2008 7:37:20 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cdchik123
Superdelegates should reflect voters' will

The voters don't have a will - they do what the MSM tells them to. ;)

35 posted on 03/17/2008 7:40:49 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson