Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Problem with White Voters
American Thinker ^ | 3-21-08 | James Pennington

Posted on 03/21/2008 4:32:04 AM PDT by Renfield

The racial dimension of Barack Obama's electability problem is now apparent, but no prominent Democrat dares discuss it openly. Similarly expect no discussion of the subject in the major media.

The white working class vote

I am not referring to the ongoing and intense discussion of The Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Wright is a separate problem for Obama. Whether Obama has been, or will be, permanently weakened by his long and close association with Wright, or has soared above it with his Philadelphia speech, is not the subject of these thoughts. Something much simpler than the answer to that question has been starkly apparent for some time, certainly since well before the Wright eruption: Consistently, and by large margins, Obama has lost the white working class vote to Clinton in all states critical to the Democratic ticket this November. The lurking suspicion -- impossible to verify or refute -- is that much of Clinton's handsome portion of this demographic will not go to Obama in the November election.

This has grave implications for a Obama, at least in Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Working class whites have voted heavily for Clinton in these states (or, in the case of Pennsylvania, will soon do so). The return of the Reagan Democrats, not the odious fulminations of Reverend Wright and their consequences, is what is now driving Democratic Big Wigs to the bourbon cabinet. Predictably, the media either refuses to acknowledge this now established voting pattern or, in some cases, actually denies its existence.

The latest example of denial is by Dan Balz, staff writer for the Washington Post, who remarked in his March 17, 2008 article purporting to analyze the white male vote, that Wisconsin (where Obama did relatively well among white males overall) and Ohio (where Clinton crushed him, 66-33%, among white working class males) are "states with striking similarities." It appears Mr. Balz has not looked at the two states closely and thoughtfully. In the crucial details of racial demographics, Ohio and Wisconsin are worlds apart; and it is through these details that Obama's white working class problem can be understood.

A tale of two states

Here are some pertinent facts about Wisconsin and Ohio: Wisconsin has about 5.5 million residents, Ohio about 11.3 million. Wisconsin is about 89% white and 5.7% black, while Ohio is 85% white and about 11.5% black. The small (but statistically significant) difference in percentage of blacks living in the two states was the least part of Obama's problem in Ohio. Obama's real difficulty in Ohio - and it has been a consistent one for him in similar states -- is the widely dispersed and interwoven location of the two racial groups in that state, versus their relative isolation from each other in Wisconsin. Here, I warn the reader, we are entering emotionally rough terrain for those schooled only in the mandatory American racial catechism of the last forty years.

For at least the last two generations America's racial policies have been predicated on a near religious belief that increased contact between the races will produce harmony, good feelings and positive relationships. Our experience during this period has been uniformly the opposite. Urban white liberals have fled the public schools by the hundreds of thousands, self-segregation by blacks on university campuses is widespread, resentment in the workplace (by both races) ubiquitous etc. In his Philadelphia speech Obama himself referred -- perhaps the first such reference by a black politician without open contempt -- to the concerns that many white Americans have about blacks.

The salient fact is this: in settings where the two races deal more directly with each other, and get to know each other better, through shared public schools, workplaces, public conveyances, universities, etc., they seem to like each other less, not more.

This fact is laid bare, at least for anyone willing to see it, by the Democratic primary results thus far.

Consider the following additional facts about Wisconsin and Ohio, those states with "striking similarities."

In Wisconsin more than 75% of the black population resides in the Milwaukee area, a metropolitan area that accounts for only 32% of Wisconsin's total population. This means that in Wisconsin the white portion of 68% of the state's population (which is more heavily white than the state as a whole because of the concentration of blacks in Milwaukee) rarely if ever encounters blacks. Thus, for a high proportion of Wisconsin whites, blacks are abstractions, approached most closely by turning on Oprah.

Now consider Ohio: to begin with, the black population, in percentage terms, is nearly double that of Wisconsin (11.5% versus 5.7%). But its dispersion within and among the white population is the real difference between the two states'racial demographics. In Ohio 80% of the state's 11.3 million residents reside in the eight largest metropolitan areas (Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo, Akron, Dayton, Youngstown and Canton). These cities contain, in the order listed, 24%, 51%, 43%, 24%, 28%, 43%, 44% and 21% black residents. Thus, in Ohio a very high percentage of the white population, particularly its working class component, has regular contact with blacks, or, if living in outer suburbs, has direct contact with other whites who do.

The widely disparate residential patterns of the races is obvious: in Wisconsin, the vast majority of whites live, work, shop, and send their children to school in a world that includes few if any blacks; in Ohio the reverse is true, and the races regularly brush up against each other in all these categories of daily life. Judging from how well Obama did among white voters in these states (satisfactorily in Wisconsin, abysmally in Ohio) increased racial familiarity is not a boon to the Illinois Senator.

The sad truth about racial interaction

Good debaters (and those on the ideological Left) will point out that I have linked two phenomena causally (racial interaction, on the one hand, and disinclination by working class whites to vote for a black candidate, on the other) without actually demonstrating cause and effect. But fortunately it does not take a Ford Foundation grant and a two year study to see what is happening. In this year's Democratic primary results the two phenomena -- extensive racial interaction and poor outcomes for Obama among working class white voters -- have been so universally conjoined that cause and effect can be reasonably presumed.

Without exception, the Wisconsin pattern (little interracial contact) and the Ohio pattern (much more such contact) have correlated with identically opposite results throughout the Clinton/Obama battles: every state outside the South where Obama carried the white vote and won the primary or caucus was one with a small to negligible black population (Wyoming, Vermont, Wisconsin, Maine, Washington, Nebraska, Minnesota, Kansas, Utah, North Dakota, Idaho, Alaska and Iowa); in every state where a substantial and widely dispersed black population regularly interacts with whites, Obama lost the white vote and lost the primary: Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island, California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. I have omitted the candidates' home states (New York for Clinton, Illinois and Hawaii for Obama). Pennsylvania, where Clinton has a commanding lead, will follow the Ohio pattern, as will Florida and Michigan in the increasingly unlikely event of do overs.

Simply put, blacks and whites are not doing well together in America, circa 2008. Obama's battle with Clinton, all the pretty rhetoric notwithstanding, is remorselessly exposing that undiscussed fact. Obama is hurt by this -- severely it would appear -- in states where the races interact extensively, particularly at the working class level; while, in states with few blacks, the lamentable state of America's race relations is masked and Obama does reasonably well among white Democrats.

But the states with extensive racial interaction are precisely those that Democrats regularly carry, or need to carry, to win. Of course in several such states whites in general vote sufficiently Democratic to overcome the now obvious disinclination of working class whites to vote for Obama (e.g., Massachusetts, New York, California). But that is not true of the critical states mentioned above and, possibly, several others.

Candor

Michelle Obama attended Princeton and the Harvard Law School. Taking her at her word, interacting with whites in these rarified settings did little to improve her feelings about her country, including, presumably, the whites who made up the majority of her classmates. Given America's current rules of racial engagement -- which allow negative views of whites by blacks to be expressed but forbid the reverse - Mrs. Obama felt free to express herself publicly (though now, no doubt, wishes she had been less candid).

On the other side of the divide, the only remaining permissible venue for white expression of racial grievance is the voting booth. Where social policy, proximity, and numbers create mandatory interaction by whites and blacks in settings less elegant than Princeton and Harvard, white disenchantment engendered by that interaction finds its outlet in elections.

The theory that greater familiarity is an antidote to mutual antagonism holds only if each party likes what it sees in the other as the familiarity develops. This does not appear to be the case with either principal race in America. The consequences are playing out at the ballot box.

Doubters of this reality should not only consider Mrs.Obama's words, but take a look at the racial demographics of states outside the South where her husband won the white vote (and the state), and compare them with the racial demographics of the states where he lost the white vote (and the state).

Whether this voting pattern will persist is a matter on which no guess is ventured. Whether the Wright fiasco will worsen it for Obama is unknoweable. That the pattern does exist is an indisputable fact.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; alsharpton; clinton; crimerate; elections; foodstamps; jessejackson; nobama; obama; ohno; quotas; race; racenorming; reparations; shakedown; ssi; victimology; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

1 posted on 03/21/2008 4:32:05 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renfield
San Francisco hopes to reverse black flight

But it's not just about race.

2 posted on 03/21/2008 4:36:52 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; Larry Lucido; Diplomat; ...
When I get elected... I'll reach out to those typical white people--

And send all them crackers... to Gitmo!

3 posted on 03/21/2008 4:39:29 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Plenty of discussions are going on in the back rooms at the DNC.

They want a win. First they thought Clinton. She didn't run a way with the nomination. Then they thought Obama. He was gaining new voters and seemed untouchable above the fray. That came to a screeching halt when the Wright tapes finally got aired.

The DNC still want a win. If the polling continues to show him sinking faster than a rock by the PA primary, the DNC may find a way to bring the MI and FL delegates and give Clinton the win.

One commentator/pollster yesterday on Hannity’s radio program came up with a scenario where Al Gore could turn out to be the Dems’ default candidate.

4 posted on 03/21/2008 4:48:11 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“One commentator/pollster yesterday on Hannity’s radio program came up with a scenario where Al Gore could turn out to be the Dems’ default candidate”.

...absolutely! Why do you think he keeps harping about “Global Warming”? Because he gives a s#%t about the environment?! That’s his ace in the hole.


5 posted on 03/21/2008 4:51:09 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I see only one way out of this for the rats.

The black racists don’t like hillary, and the white racists don’t like obama.

They need to nominate a Robert Byrd/Louis Farakhan ticket, so the racists on both sides have someone to support.

The rats can throw a Selma hose and dog party to celebrate.


6 posted on 03/21/2008 4:51:47 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Governments hate armed citizens more than armed criminals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Obama doesn’t have a race problem, Americans are over the race issue. Obama has a anti-American, Socialist, kook problem. Blacks should be offended that such ideas would be identified with them, and the color of their skin.


7 posted on 03/21/2008 4:52:44 AM PDT by mission9 (It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Obama’s popularity among Dems has always resulted from their knowing that Mrs. Clinton could not win. He became the alternative.


8 posted on 03/21/2008 4:54:34 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Well, as Barack himself would say, “typical white people” have certain attitudes “bred into” them. Of course whites can and do vote for African Americans. But African American candidates who have belonged to an overtly racist organization for twenty years and then presume to lecture the rest of us on racial harmony may be at a disadvantage.
9 posted on 03/21/2008 4:54:57 AM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Obama's Problem with Typical White Voters

there. fixed it.

10 posted on 03/21/2008 4:56:29 AM PDT by Eddie01 (Freepers don't let Freepers get spun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mission9
Of course your right. Obama loves despots, thats why he hates America using force against them. He sees America the way his Reverend does "God damn America!". He thinks America oppresses people of color instead of liberating them.

The truth seems to be for the Dems that

A. Obama and his wife and pastor hate what America stands for and sees it as a force for evil used by white people to oppress the world.

B. Hillary sees America in a similar way but likes the idea of using Americas might to oppress all people who oppose the UN or a world government type system. The Clintons are citizens of the world.

Now compare this with McCain who had is arms torn from his sockets for his country.

I mock the Rats choices.

11 posted on 03/21/2008 4:59:45 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mission9

Bingo!

It angers me that the media is trying to turn this into a “race” race for the presidency.


12 posted on 03/21/2008 5:00:48 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I think this is a pretty good analysis. I grew up in Wisconsin, so I can verify his description.


13 posted on 03/21/2008 5:03:38 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
I was truly offended when I heard that a$$hat Obama say “typical white person!” McCain is looking better all the time.
14 posted on 03/21/2008 5:04:37 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (So long Myron. Call the Steelers games from heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Obama's problem with white peoeple, and indeed with any traditional Christian valued individual white or black or brown or yellow or any other, is summed up succinctly in the following statement regarding Black Liberation Theology. This is the heart of the doctrine his pastor, and his church, embraces. As defined by one of the founders of that doctine, James Cone:

"Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love."

That is the essence of this alien religion...this perversion of Christianity...and is why there is so much nager and hate in it. This is what Obama has embraced.

15 posted on 03/21/2008 5:09:29 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Obama's Problem with White Voters

His overwhelming hatred toward them is slipping through his polished charm?
16 posted on 03/21/2008 5:09:48 AM PDT by Vision ("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1

Could you imagine saying that Obama is:

A “typical black person” and the attitudes he expresses were “bred into” him.

White people get chastised for saying such ‘typical’ things by the PC Police, well he needs to be held to the fire for using and perpetuating stereotypes...for profiling the ‘typical’ white voter.


17 posted on 03/21/2008 5:09:54 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EBH

ping


18 posted on 03/21/2008 5:12:40 AM PDT by Fred911 (YOU GET WHAT YOU ACCEPT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mission9
Obama has a anti-American, Socialist, kook problem. Blacks should be offended that such ideas would be identified with them, and the color of their skin.

I was listening to a black talk show host Vincent Warren? and there was no inward thought going on. It was all Hannity's, Limbaugh's, etcs... fault.

They were destroying the good will and "healing" this election was about to realize.

Group. Think.

19 posted on 03/21/2008 5:13:28 AM PDT by Eddie01 (Freepers don't let Freepers get spun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
" ... The DNC still want a win. If the polling continues to show him sinking faster than a rock by the PA primary, the DNC may find a way to bring the MI and FL delegates and give Clinton the win.

One commentator/pollster yesterday on Hannity’s radio program came up with a scenario where Al Gore could turn out to be the Dems’ default candidate.
"


A lose, lose, lose situation ... and are the blacks gonna be pissed off?

You betcha.

20 posted on 03/21/2008 5:19:49 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vision

It came bursting through a long time ago, but we were too dumb to notice:

From Dreams of My Father, “ I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASISVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”. Barack Hussein Obama

From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “The emotion between the races could never be pure, even love was tarnished by the desire to find in the other some element that was missing in ourselves. Whether we sought out our demons or salvation, the other race (WHITE) would always remain just that: menacing, alien, and apart.” Barack Hussein Obama

From Dreams Of My Father: “That hate hadn’t gone away,” he wrote, BLAMING “WHITE PEOPLE — some CRUEL, some IGNORANT, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.” Barack Hussein Obama

From ‘Dreams Of My Father’, “There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on,to show your LOYALTY TO THE BLACK MASSES, TO STRIKE OUT and name names” Barack Hussein Obama


21 posted on 03/21/2008 5:25:36 AM PDT by cyberella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Very, very good analysis. Highly accurate.


22 posted on 03/21/2008 5:25:57 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mission9

No America will never be over the race issue as long as white perceive blacks are carrying the legacy of slavery from 150 years ago as a crutch.

I spoke with an Obama volunteer yesterday regarding Rev. Wright, etc. She said she had gone to the Church and never heard the Reverend say anything offensive. I asked based on what some are saying about Wrights comments, her opinion of what is offensive and my opinion may very well be miles apart. She became upset and immediatley threw the “we came here as slaves” argument at me. I said 600,000 died ending that tragedy and I am sick of hearing that crutch. Needless to say, it really went down hill after that...


23 posted on 03/21/2008 5:28:27 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

If the Democrats nominate anybody besides Obama, which they will have to do if they want to even have a small chance of winning in November, blacks will scream that they are again being moved to the back of the bus and all hell will break loose including blacks staying home in November. Maybe even a few riots.


24 posted on 03/21/2008 5:30:39 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Interesting. Should the Dems think that Obama can't win they will almost certainly try to torpedo him in some form or fashion. From Howard Dean's vantage point Democrats will feel themselves completely and totally justified in seeking a national Party win for the greater good. Blacks, however, will never see it as anything more than theft and outright oppression by Whites, an inalterable grievance.

Perhaps...perhaps it would be then that Blacks finally awake to realize how Democrats are have never really been interested in Black people other than to use them and to harness them for their political power.

25 posted on 03/21/2008 5:34:45 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy; cdchik123
cdchick123 called it for Gore two days earlier than Zogby
26 posted on 03/21/2008 5:44:09 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Thank God for every morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

true I guess


27 posted on 03/21/2008 5:54:49 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I guess it would be unhelpful to point out that they were sold into slavery by other more successful blacks who had defeated and captured their ancestors in Africa? Just askin’ ;)


28 posted on 03/21/2008 5:55:24 AM PDT by bt_dooftlook (Democrats - the "No Child/Left/Behind" Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
I asked based on what some are saying about Wrights comments, her opinion of what is offensive and my opinion may very well be miles apart. She became upset and immediatley threw the “we came here as slaves” argument at me.

None of Obama's people were slaves unless they were slaves in Africa of other black people
As far as his deranged preacher. He went to integrated schools in Philadelphia

29 posted on 03/21/2008 5:58:30 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
I said 600,000 died ending that tragedy and I am sick of hearing that crutch. Needless to say, it really went down hill after that...

Black people's plight would be worse had there been no US slavery. None want to return to their roots.

30 posted on 03/21/2008 5:59:07 AM PDT by existtoexcel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah; HD1200
Obama had an excellent chance of becoming POTUS.

For all intents & purposes he was running against two other Democrats (Hillary & Dem lite McCain)... Turn out would have been huge ... He is a smooth talker ... (although he is like Chance the gardener in "Being There")... and there probably would have been enough RINO's crossing over to do the job.


Now, Obama is history. And the irony is that he did it himself.

But ... as with any Democrat ... it is everyone else's fault but his.


Bararack Hussein Obama, and his mentor the infamous J.Wright, may well go down as the guys who set race relations back for generations to come.

31 posted on 03/21/2008 6:00:19 AM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

“The salient fact is this: in settings where the two races deal more directly with each other, and get to know each other better, through shared public schools, workplaces, public conveyances, universities, etc., they seem to like each other less, not more.”

You got it. Once you start judging people on the content of their character, you soon realize that there is not a whole lot to love.


32 posted on 03/21/2008 6:00:41 AM PDT by shaft29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

The blacks don’t care. THey are smart enough to know that democrats do damage to america. They hate america. THerefore they vote democrat.

This is my suspicion now, after hearing so much crap from the obama camp.


33 posted on 03/21/2008 6:00:55 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I can imagine that downhill slide...

This article is so accurate, it’s scary. It’s also SOOOOO anti-PC, that I’m shocked this guy, Pennington, would publish it under his name.

I am not “anti-black”. I work with, and around several black people that I love dearly. For those blacks who actually WORK, who take pride in what they do (whatever it is), who give a crap about their families, and who are striving to improve themselves and their communities.... I have the utmost respect and affection.

For the many, many others that I see every day.... hanging on the street corners drinking beer at noon, shooting each other in the streets of West End Louisville at 2 am, cruising around town in flashy “drug-store-on-wheels” hot rods..... I have nothing but contempt.

They drag our society down in so many ways. Take a look at every state that scores AT THE BOTTOM in academic achievement. What do they have in common? High %’s of black population. Where are the unemployed? The single parent homes?? Largely dominated by heavily black populations.

I’m sorry.. but, this does make me mad. For goodness sakes, WHEN??? will they care enough to DO SOMETHING about their own plight? I refuse to believe that it has to be this way.... It is not WHITE AMERICA holding them down. They keep themselves down... believing crap like that espoused by Rev. JWright.


34 posted on 03/21/2008 6:02:21 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

“One commentator/pollster yesterday on Hannity’s radio program came up with a scenario where Al Gore could turn out to be the Dems’ default candidate.”

Dems: The party where every vote counts... Except when they don’t want it to count.


35 posted on 03/21/2008 6:05:22 AM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1

Obama’s probably shocked that his comment of

“typical white people”

has raised so much ire.

Actually, the phrase doesn’t bother me one bit, EXCEPT -

if it were reversed, the person uttering such a thing would be vehemently attacked as a racist.

The best thing to do when there’s injustice enforced from on high is to “make the rulers live by their own rulebook”.


36 posted on 03/21/2008 6:05:28 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Bararack Hussein Obama, and his mentor the infamous J.Wright, may well go down as the guys who set race relations back for generations to come.

I suspect you may be right about this. They are exposing the great divide. And, this will drive us farther apart, not closer together.

37 posted on 03/21/2008 6:05:51 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Were you really offended by the phrase, or by the knowledge of what would happen if this were reversed?

I’m not offended by it, but it REALLY pisses me off to know that he can think he can say it, but that someone white would have been pilloried.


38 posted on 03/21/2008 6:06:51 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Doubters of this reality should not only consider Mrs. Obama's words,

After listening to the rev (???? not someone I would call a rev) wright, I have no doubt why she FINALLY feels good about her country. All those hate filled sermons had an effect on her, as well as others in attendance. Anyone who doubts there are racial issues being stoked and kept alive by the radical "spiritual advisors" in the black community have their head in the sand or firmly up their backsides, giving themselves an eyes-on view of their own colonoscopy.

Remember all the funeralizing the black pastors had for the "N" word a few months ago? Now, we hear B Hussein O's "spiritual advisor" and other "revs" use it time after time from their churches' pulpits. Talk about hypocrites.

Then the "rev" @l $h@rpton has the gall to get on TV and says he hears NO RACIAL remarks in those speeches. Two straight nights in a row, he was on with Greta and denied that he heard on single racial comment directed against a person. He said Imus should have been fired for calling the Rutgers women's basketball team "nappy headed ****", and that was a racial slur.

The "rev" wright said that "whiteys control the country" and "hillary ain't never been called a N*****" are not racial slurs. Well, the last one in actuality isn't because of a double negative, but I doubt the rev even thought about that.

That settles that. The "N" word is no longer a racial slur. The "rev" @l $h@rpton said so, so I will use it every day again. /s

39 posted on 03/21/2008 6:07:43 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (His middle name is NOT Hussein for being a Christian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Obama’s supporters are going to be ESPECIALLY pissed off because they’ll know that he was rejected because he held the same beliefs that they do.


40 posted on 03/21/2008 6:07:51 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
"James Pennington" is a nom-de-plume. Not his real name.
41 posted on 03/21/2008 6:07:55 AM PDT by Renfield (Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mission9
Obama doesn’t have a race problem, Americans are over the race issue. Obama has a anti-American, Socialist, kook problem. Blacks should be offended that such ideas would be identified with them, and the color of their skin.

You nailed it. Those "working class racists" as described by this author are, by and large, patriotic. They drive around with flags on their vehicles and are among the first to volunteer when their country needs them. They're the salt of the earth types whose families have been here for generations. They just don't get it yet that the Democrat Party (for which they've voted for generations) has veered to the far left.

The author of this article is trying to deflect the issue and put whites on the defensive again. Gotta keep the focus where it belongs - on the "hate America" crowd (of any and all races).

42 posted on 03/21/2008 6:08:27 AM PDT by randita (I'm a "typical white person" and I voted for Lynn Swann.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

“we came here as slaves” -

If you REALLY wanna anger someone using this “argument stopper”,

ask them if they’d be better off born in Africa.


43 posted on 03/21/2008 6:09:15 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Just heard that Patrick Kennedy is going to brief Obama's staff.

I think I recall that PK is an Obama supporter.

He may use this as ammo to take out Hillary.

44 posted on 03/21/2008 6:11:55 AM PDT by mware (mware...killer of threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
They need to nominate a Robert Byrd/Louis Farakhan ticket, so the racists on both sides have someone to support.

Dude!

BRILLIANT!!!!!

It's the perfect 'Rat ticket.

45 posted on 03/21/2008 6:12:54 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mware

He may use this as ammo to take out Hillary.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Use what as ammo?


46 posted on 03/21/2008 6:15:00 AM PDT by mamelukesabre (Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mission9
Obama doesn’t have a race problem, Americans are over the race issue.

Based on my reading of the article, you must follow the Wisconsin pattern.

47 posted on 03/21/2008 6:19:20 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Sorry mame, I posted my comment on the wrong thread. I was referring to the fact that the breach of the passport information regarding Obama, may have come from a person appointed by Clinton.
48 posted on 03/21/2008 6:20:38 AM PDT by mware (mware...killer of threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MrB
I'm not offended by the fact that a white person could not get away with saying “typical black person.” I just shake my head and remember that we are dealing with the typical liberal media. I am however,offended by this little college educated punk saying this about me(a white person) what the hell does he know about me??!!!
49 posted on 03/21/2008 6:23:22 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (So long Myron. Call the Steelers games from heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
One commentator/pollster yesterday on Hannity’s radio program came up with a scenario where Al Gore could turn out to be the Dems’ default candidate.

John Zogby.

50 posted on 03/21/2008 6:25:31 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson