Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney hits out at Iran, Syria as he wraps up Mideast peace push
YahooNews/AFP ^ | Mar 24, 2008

Posted on 03/24/2008 8:27:24 PM PDT by nuconvert

Cheney hits out at Iran, Syria as he wraps up Mideast peace push

Mar 24, 2008

JERUSALEM (AFP) - US Vice President Dick Cheney on Monday hit out at Iran and Syria as he wrapped up a Middle East peace push, saying they were undermining the renewed but faltering Israeli-Palestinian talks.

Iran and Syria "are doing everything they can to torpedo the peace process," Cheney told reporters in Jerusalem as he wrapped up a visit to Israel and the Palestinian territories before heading to Turkey.

During his talks with Israeli and Palestinian leadership, "I reaffirmed the president's commitment to help the process forward," Cheney said.

US President George W. Bush has said he hoped the two sides could strike a deal before he ends his term in January 2009.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who met twice with Cheney during his visit "reaffirmed his commitment to the president's vision and his willigness to do everything he can to achieve a result in 2008 although he is well aware of the difficulties," Cheney said.

In Turkey, Cheney was to meet with President Abdullah Gul, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other senior officials on the last leg of a regional tour that has also taken him to Iraq, Afghanistan, Oman, and Saudi Arabia.

In his first visit to the occupied West Bank as vice president on Sunday, Cheney said he told moderate Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas that "the United States is committed to doing everything we can to facilitate the peace process" but "we cannot dictate the outcome."

The talks with the Palestinian leadership came as Abbas's secular Fatah party and the Hamas movement penned a deal in Yemen to hold their first direct talks since the Islamists' bloody seizure of Gaza nine months ago.

"My conclusion in talking with the Palestinian leadership is that they have established preconditions which would have to be filled before they would ever agree to a reconciliation including a complete reversal of the Hamas takeover of Gaza," Cheney said.

A senior US administration official told reporters that Cheney told Abbas that Washington will not "support working with Hamas unless they were to fundamentally change their stripes."

He was referring to Western demands that Hamas renounce violence, recognise Israel and past peace deals.

Hamas, a group pledged to Israel's destruction and considered a terror outfit by the US and the Jewish state, routed pro-Abbas forces in June in Gaza, splitting the Palestinians into two separate entities.

On Sunday, Cheney warned the Palestinians that continuing attacks on Israel "kill the legitimate hopes and aspirations of the Palestinian people" for their "long overdue" state.

At a joint press conference with Cheney, Abbas once again condemned the rocket attacks on Israel from Gaza, but said Israel would have to halt military raids and expanding settlements to strike a peace deal.

Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank are one of the main snags that have hampered peace talks since they were relaunched under US stewardship at an international conference in November.

Arriving in the Holy Land during the Easter weekend, Cheney vowed Washington's "unshakeable" defence of Israel's security, assured the Palestinians of US "goodwill," and said both sides would have to make "painful concessions" if they were to strike a deal to end their decades-old conflict.

The vice president also discussed what he called "darkening shadows" in Israel's arch-foe Iran, Syria and the Palestinian Gaza Strip, controlled by the Islamist Hamas movement.

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak told Cheney late Monday that while economic sanctions were for the moment the best way to deal with Tehran, "no option should be ruled out."

"Iran's weapons programme threatens not only the stability of the region, but of the whole world," Barak said.

Washington and Israel, widely considered the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear power, accuse Iran of pursuing the development of a nuclear bomb under the guise of its civilian nuclear programme, a charge Tehran denies.

The vice president's visit was part of a US diplomatic flurry before Bush returns to Israel in May for the 60th anniversary of the founding of the Jewish state.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cheney; damascus; iran; israel; jihad; oil; syria; tehran

1 posted on 03/24/2008 8:27:26 PM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Mr. Vice President, God knows I love ya, I wish that it was Vice President George W. Bush making this trip while you, President Cheney was in Washington, but I gotta say, that I’m sick and tired of everyone talking about the ‘peace process’ when we KNOW those Islamofascist SOBs want nothing to do with ‘peace’ unless it is ‘rest in peace’ for US as in U.S., and for Israel as in “our only real ally”.

Let’s hear some talk about the ‘WAR process’, shall we?

Let’s talk about that.

2 posted on 03/24/2008 8:40:46 PM PDT by mkjessup (This year's presidential choices: "Speak No Evil, See No Evil, and Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

3 posted on 03/24/2008 9:04:35 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
"Hit out at"? Just telling the truth nowadays, is "hitting"!

Cheney said they were undermining the peace process? Why, that meany! he's exposed their plans, and told the world in clear concise terms what the enemies of Jewry have been up to recently. How could he be so rude?

Rocket attacks, suicide/homicide bombings, those don't seem to be characterized as hitting, or much anything worse ---- when it's done against Israel, woops, I mean when it murders Israeli citizens.

4 posted on 03/24/2008 9:29:53 PM PDT by BlueDragon (here's the thing; do recognize the bell of truth when you here it ring, c'mon and sing it children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
There was a article here on FR about a year ago explaining how the US was going to plan it's strategy in how they were going to talk to all the nations in the area i.e. Saudi Arabia, U.A.E. , Israel, so and so on , on how to deal with Iran before the US even thinks about taking action with Iran.
Some were in the report is that publicly, they ( Saudi's ) and other nations would denounce a move by the US to take care of Iran, but privately, with other nations in the area would welcome the US to take out Iran's capabilities to control the region.
Also in the process before the US were to make a move, strike a deal with Israel and the Palestinians for Peace before the US makes a move, can anyone find that article ?
5 posted on 03/24/2008 10:03:41 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
The Iranian Islamic dictatorship, responsible for many hundreds of our servicemen being murdered in Iraq, by Iranian terrorist agents and Iranian trained Iraqi Shi'ite terrorist gangs.

The Russian armed Damascus and Tehran terrorist exporting régimes must be overthrown before the unthinkable happens. The US, Israel, the UK and other allies need to confront the enemy behind the enemy.

6 posted on 03/24/2008 10:34:30 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

I remember that article you speak of, but not in enough detail to identify it, sorry.

We are in my estimation, past the point of ‘talking about the problem’. No more talk now, let’s see some damn action.

Talk is cheap.

7 posted on 03/25/2008 12:00:15 AM PDT by mkjessup (This year's presidential choices: "Speak No Evil, See No Evil, and Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
well,,, IF ? there is going to be anything done about it,, we only got 10 months to go before President Bush leaves office, and do we think ( God forbid ) Hillary or Obama will deal with Iran ?
8 posted on 03/27/2008 7:14:09 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

It’s a funny thing about ‘Rats and wars, I’m not entirely sure that Democrat administrations are totally adverse to going to war, because war is something that allows them to raise taxes, exert greater control over the civilian population, wrap themselves in the Flag, pummel Republicans who don’t ‘go along to get along’, so I’m not 100 percent convinced that Hiliarly or Obama-lama-ding-dong would refuse to deal with Iran in a military way, my concern is that they would wait TOO LONG (hmmm, kinda like our current conpassionate-conservative Commander-In-Chief, eh?).

9 posted on 03/27/2008 8:42:06 PM PDT by mkjessup (This year's presidential choices: "Speak No Evil, See No Evil, and Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson