Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. firm lays claim to 'potentially vast' Arctic oil resources[400Bil Barrels]
The Ottawa Citizen ^ | 21 Mar 2008 | Randy Boswell

Posted on 03/26/2008 5:29:48 PM PDT by BGHater

U.S. firm lays claim to nearly all of what it says will be 400 billion barrels

A U.S.-based company that has controversially laid claim to nearly all of the Arctic Ocean's undersea oil said yesterday that new geological data suggest a "potentially vast" petroleum resource of 400 billion barrels.

That figure is backed by a respected Canadian researcher who recently signed on as the firm's chief scientific adviser.

Las Vegas-based Arctic Oil & Gas has raised eyebrows around the world with its roll-of-the-dice bid to lock up exclusive rights to extract oil and gas from rapidly melting areas of the central Arctic Ocean, currently beyond the territorial control of Canada, Russia and other polar nations.

The company, which counts retired B.C. senator Edward Lawson among its directors, has filed a claim with the United Nations to act as the sole "development agent" of Arctic seabed oil and gas.

The firm acknowledges that the Arctic's petroleum deposits are the "common heritage of mankind," but has argued that the polar region requires a private "lead manager" to organize a multinational consortium of oil companies to extract undersea resources responsibly and equitably.

The Canadian government has dismissed the company's "alleged claim" over Arctic oil as having "no force in law," but experts in polar issues have raised alarms about the firm's actions, saying they could disrupt efforts to create an orderly regime for exploiting resources and protecting the Arctic environment under international law rather than a marketplace model.

In its latest statement about the polar seabed's "enormous reserve potential" for petroleum deposits, Arctic Oil & Gas cites recent scientific evidence that huge, floating mats of azolla -- a prehistoric fern believed to have covered much of the Arctic Ocean during a planetary hothouse era about 55 million years ago -- decomposed soon after the age of the dinosaurs and exist today as "vast hydrocarbon resources" trapped in layers of rock below the polar ice cap.

Jonathan Bujak, a former geoscientist with the Geological Survey of Canada who now works as a private consultant in Canada and Britain, is described in the Arctic Oil & Gas statement as confirming the "highly probable validity" of recent research pointing to rock layers "extremely rich" in "hydrocarbon precursors" throughout the Arctic basin.

Mr. Bujak, who previously worked for PetroCanada as a petroleum geologist, co-authored a landmark 2006 study in the journal Nature that first detailed the ancient azolla explosion that shows up today in Arctic seabed core samples.

Neither Mr. Bujak nor Mr. Lawson could be reached for comment yesterday.

Scientists have predicted that global warming could leave the entire Arctic virtually ice-free for months at a time within 20 years. That prospect has hastened a scramble among nations with a polar coast -- namely Canada, Russia, the U.S., Norway and Denmark, which controls Greenland -- to try to strengthen their scientific claims under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to extended territorial sovereignty over the Arctic Ocean floor.

A report issued last week by the European Union's top two foreign policy officials also highlighted the looming international struggle over Arctic oil deposits.

Authored by Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief, and Benita Ferrero-Waldner, Europe's commissioner for external relations, the study pointed to "potential consequences for international stability and European security interests" as the retreat of Arctic ice makes shipping and oil and gas exploration a reality in the region.

Noting the "rapid melting of the polar ice caps," the report noted that "the increased accessibility of the enormous hydrocarbon resources in the Arctic region is changing the geo-strategic dynamics of the region."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: artic; energy; ocean; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: BGHater

One Question:
When are they going to start drilling and delivering to a gas station near me?


21 posted on 03/26/2008 6:16:01 PM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Las Vegas-based Arctic Oil & Gas

I sense an IPO and go pattern being run.

22 posted on 03/26/2008 6:16:48 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

bump


23 posted on 03/26/2008 6:18:42 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

‘Las Vegas-based Arctic Oil & Gas’

Aka, Nigerian Arctic Pump and Dump.


24 posted on 03/26/2008 6:19:22 PM PDT by BGHater ($2300 is the limit of your Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ketsu
IIRC the russians already claim it.

The Nautilus was there first!

25 posted on 03/26/2008 6:19:56 PM PDT by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
but experts in polar issues have raised alarms about the firm's actions, saying they could disrupt efforts to create an orderly regime for exploiting resources and protecting the Arctic environment under international law rather than a marketplace model.

For those who need a translator, what this really says is that enviro wackos have are worried that they won't be able to prevent any drilling in the arctic under any circumstances.

26 posted on 03/26/2008 6:23:55 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
This is all is was talking about.... It's from TIME (dubious I know but seems to be correct here.)

The ice-frozen North Pole is currently a no man's land supervised by a U.N. Commission. The five Polar countries — Russia, the U.S., Canada, Norway and Denmark — each control only a 200-mile economic zone along their coasts.

And none of these economic zones reach the North Pole. Under the current U.N. Maritime convention, one country's zone can be extended only if it can prove that the continental shelf into which it wishes to expand is a natural extension of its own territory, by showing that it shares a similar geological structure.

27 posted on 03/26/2008 6:24:19 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I stopped reading after “rapidly melting areas of the central Arctic Ocean.”


28 posted on 03/26/2008 6:26:56 PM PDT by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ketsu; DoughtyOne
Russia's claim was to the Lomonosov ridge only. This private sector group is seeking the entire arctic commons.

Also Russia's claim was based on the ridge being part of their shelf, while this private sector company is seeking the seabed.

This US private sector group cannot make claims on the seabed unless the US signs the treaty

29 posted on 03/26/2008 6:27:07 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I’d rather have Tony’s crew running it than the UN. The street tax would be a LOT less.


30 posted on 03/26/2008 6:28:50 PM PDT by joebuck (Finitum non capax infinitum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
How much ya wanna bet that claim gets lost in the UN's basement mailroom?


31 posted on 03/26/2008 6:40:57 PM PDT by Viking2002 (I hope the AG pounds the Mann Act up Spitzer's ass with a sharp stick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

We’d better get the Burns Slant Drilling Co. on retainer PDQ.


32 posted on 03/26/2008 6:49:06 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Pump the middle east dry. Then sell them our oil for 1,000 dollars a barrel.


33 posted on 03/26/2008 7:26:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Las Vegas-based Arctic Oil & Gas has raised eyebrows around the world with its roll-of-the-dice bid to lock up exclusive rights to extract oil and gas from rapidly melting areas of the central Arctic Ocean, currently beyond the territorial control of Canada, Russia and other polar nations.

They'll be rapidly freezing areas in about 6 months.

34 posted on 03/26/2008 7:58:08 PM PDT by xjcsa (Has anyone seen my cornballer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

“Can we tell Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela to go shove it now?”

For sure! Add that 400 billion barrels to the 500 in the Bakken Formation and the World will be back to kissing our arses for a change. But we need at least seven new refineries before we can get too cocky with them I fear.


35 posted on 03/26/2008 8:15:27 PM PDT by Birdsbane (If You Are Employed By A Liberal Democrat...Quit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

i’m selling plots on the moon. i’ve gotten the okay from the un so the moon is legally mine.


36 posted on 03/26/2008 9:54:07 PM PDT by californiabear832
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Good. I hope we don’t sign on. It sure says something about this corporation that they would go straight to the U.N. to make the claim. Evidently they recognize it’s self-proclaimed authority on everything.


37 posted on 03/26/2008 10:39:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (New Europe, John Benedict Arnold McCain's bridge to 07/03/1776. Not even our past is safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Any Polar Bears out there.?


38 posted on 05/17/2008 10:05:29 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson