Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYP: GOP ACHILLES HEEL--HOW REPUBLICANS LOST WEST
New York Post ^ | March 28, 2008 | Ryan Sager

Posted on 03/28/2008 8:12:56 AM PDT by OESY

...The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press finds that the share of voters who call themselves Republicans has dropped six points nationwide since 2004. That doesn't matter much in the Northeast (where the GOP's already locked out) or Down South (where the GOP remains dominant). But in the interior West, it's a big, big deal.

In 2000, none of these eight states had a Democratic governor. Now five do, including Colorado. A 2006 post-election Salt Lake City Tribune analysis showed that, where the GOP had beaten the Democrats by 20 points in the region's vote for the House in 2000, that advantage had fallen to one point in 2006. A few states, including Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico, had seen a majority of House votes cast for the Democrats.

In fact, Colorado now looks bluer than a half-drowned Smurf. It's got a Democratic governor, House, Senate and high court. The GOP lost both houses of the Legislature in 2004 after spending a session on such issues as gay marriage, the Pledge of Allegiance and the liberal biases of college professors - while the state faced a massive fiscal crisis.

At the federal level, the state's got a recently minted Democratic senator (Ken Salazar, replacing a Republican in 2004) and two recently acquired House seats (one picked up in 2004, one in '06). Turning Blue on the presidential ballot is all that's left in this metamorphosis.

As Caldara put it: "Colorado is, in fact, the test tube of how to export liberal expansion to the Western states." A moderately conservative state has been turned Blue....

Of course, Democrats have worked hard to capitalize on the Republicans' carelessness. Liberal groups... have turned discontent into votes. And now they have a model to use in the rest of the region....

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: conservatism; pew; republicans; west

1 posted on 03/28/2008 8:12:58 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Unfortunately, a few morons persist in thinking that by repelling potential GOP converts, losing elections and with it the power to appoint and set agendas, and forfeiting the power of the incumbency are the ways to strengthen conservatism. They will help bring about all the things they say they are against--in Fifth Column fashion, thus damaging the country irreparably--but by then, many will be gone so they won't be held responsible.

.

2 posted on 03/28/2008 8:15:12 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Ummm Colorado has alot of wild eyed liberals.

The loss of common sense is not the fault of the GOP.

LOL LOL


3 posted on 03/28/2008 8:15:22 AM PDT by JaneNC (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I don’t call myself a republican. I am a conservative who up to now voted republican.


4 posted on 03/28/2008 8:16:04 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Wouldn’t have anything to do with socialists fleeing California, would it?


5 posted on 03/28/2008 8:18:09 AM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I am not a Republican. I am a conservative, who up to this year has voted Republican.


6 posted on 03/28/2008 8:20:18 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

There are issues you use to roll out the base and then there are the issues of the day that you have to articulate positions and solutions for. Whining about gay people doesn’t solve tax or employment issues.


7 posted on 03/28/2008 8:20:20 AM PDT by misterrob (Obama-Does America Need Another Jimmy Carter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

America’s fall is tied directly to its abandoning the principles that we were founded on, namely Judeo-Christian. We have a generation of self-absorbed, impulse buyers who cannot see past what sitcom they are watching to pay attention to what is happening. They are so concerned with the last text they received and who they be hooking up with later they have basically become entitlement democrats by proxy.

Trying to correct a wrong in a party that has abandoned its roots is small beans in the face of this pandemic.


8 posted on 03/28/2008 8:20:51 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OESY

It is really easy,

we have far left social liberals in the west who have infesting the GOP leadership.

Unfortunatly most of the ones we have managed to purge out over the recent years have now glomed onto el leftst mccainiac in hopes of stopping all the possitive inroads we have made.
(protecting marriage, second amendment, stopping illegal amnesty)


9 posted on 03/28/2008 8:21:06 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
I don’t call myself a republican. I am a conservative who up to now voted republican.

I am continually considered a Republican by friends and family, and I have to constantly remind them that I do not belong to any political party -- I am a conservative, and I vote for conservative candidates.

Unfortunately, there are no conservative candidates running for president.
10 posted on 03/28/2008 8:21:13 AM PDT by Thrusher (Remember the Mog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JaneNC
What a Pack of lies .
The Pew Institute is run by Democrat party activists !
Go look at the leftists on there website.
CO was invaded by the eco crazies from Calif and all over the country. It had NOTHING to do with repub policies.
I used to do consulting there and locals were screaming about the invasion.
11 posted on 03/28/2008 8:23:11 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY

From what little I’ve seen, the explanation is rich liberals looking to move to a chic place to live. The Democrats have become the party of welfare recipients and rich yuppies, and Colorado is one of the fashionable places to build your new dream home. Or to move out of California and escape the mess you have made.

It’s much like people fleeing to New Hampshire from Taxachusetts.

Certainly something did happen after 2004 as well. Bush came back into office on a tidal wave of conservative support, and he immediately started blowing it. There was great discouragement in 2006, and even greater discouragement now, with that jackass McCain as the party’s choice.

Also, Mel Martinez ran as a “conservative,” as did many of the other new Dem senators elected that year, and regretably the voters believed his lies.


12 posted on 03/28/2008 8:24:02 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
It's got a Democratic governor, House, Senate and high court.

The High Court is Democrat? That's so wrong...

13 posted on 03/28/2008 8:27:36 AM PDT by BoneHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Rich liberals see government pork profits as their road to wealth.

IOW the ultimate OPM.


14 posted on 03/28/2008 8:27:40 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

exactly


15 posted on 03/28/2008 8:29:53 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OESY

It’s simple: the GOP establishment has gotten on small-government fiscal conservatives’ last nerve.


16 posted on 03/28/2008 8:30:09 AM PDT by steve-b (Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

another nice spot ruined by rich leftists is Whitefish MT.


17 posted on 03/28/2008 8:31:11 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OESY

all true!


18 posted on 03/28/2008 8:32:25 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I am no longer a Republican. I was one when they offered Conservative candidates, but no longer.


19 posted on 03/28/2008 8:33:52 AM PDT by Ingtar (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Colorado’s moved bluer due to all the Cali and Pac NW folks moving in, not because of an inherent shift of the domestic natives.


20 posted on 03/28/2008 8:34:04 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Trying to correct a wrong in a party that has abandoned its roots is small beans in the face of this pandemic. the problem with the republican party has always been that the Reagen republicans are a minority, the McCain's seem to control the party, thats where the losses are coming from.
21 posted on 03/28/2008 8:35:32 AM PDT by mtnjimmi (“When you choose the lesser of two evils, always remember that it is still an evil.” Max Lerner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

“Wouldn’t have anything to do with socialists fleeing California, would it?”

Yup. Tens of millions of Californians... many Liberal... having fled that state in the last decade, for surrounding states.... and bringing their leftist poison with them. They weren’t content with screwing up California. They’re determined to do it Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, etc too.


22 posted on 03/28/2008 8:38:10 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OESY

This will continue until the 9th circuit is disbanded and reformed to represent real America and not just San Francisco. This and a heavy veto pen should be job 1 for any conservative Presidential candidate. If John McCain added this to his WOT policies he could gain a great deal of support. JMHO.


23 posted on 03/28/2008 8:41:36 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

McCain has already said that he never would have appointed Alito to SCOTUS. And he has demonstrated that his idea of passing bills and confirmations through congress is “bipartisanship.”

I.e., he will work with Ted Kennedy and his other friends to choose his judges, so as to have an easier time confirming them.

So we won’t get more Ruth Bader Ginsbergs if McCain becomes president, just more David Souters.


24 posted on 03/28/2008 8:46:09 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I think his comments on Alito were twisted there and taken out of contents but it spread like wild fire on the net . He voted for Alito !
25 posted on 03/28/2008 8:50:33 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
CO was invaded by the eco crazies from Calif and all over the country. It had NOTHING to do with repub policies. I used to do consulting there and locals were screaming about the invasion.

I live here and while it is quite true that we've been invaded, imo, it wasn't only that. The Dem's somehow captured a lot of our voters. Our county has a lot of new people, but we still outnumbered registered Democrats 3 to 1, and they still won.

I knew people who are staunch conservatives who I know voted for Salazar, even knowing he was a Dem. Some based on race, some because the conservatives were labeled extreme.

And, our party really has collapsed since that election. Even when the first thing the new Democratic legislature did was work on circumnavigating TABOR (our taxpayers bill of rights, requiring all new tax increase to be set before the people), there was nary a peep from the Republican party. The only guy who cared was Joe what'shisname from the Independence Institute.

I went to the caucus and signed my name on a volunteer sheet, but have heard nothing.

26 posted on 03/28/2008 8:52:23 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
“I think his comments on Alito were twisted there and taken out of contents but it spread like wild fire on the net . He voted for Alito !”

I agree. I think he was just saying that Alito was to obvious and it might be better to appoint someone with the same principles who had a little more camouflage.

27 posted on 03/28/2008 8:57:32 AM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Cicero

McCain said he would never appoint a justice like Souter. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.


29 posted on 03/28/2008 9:39:43 AM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Yes, he voted for Alito. The spotlight was on him. But I read his remarks, and basically he said that if he had been Bush, rather than a senator, he would not have chosen Alito for confirmation—because he was too controversial.

Well, let’s face it. If McCain is elected president, and the Democrats control congress, the only way to confirm decent SCOTUS appointees will be to fight it, tooth and nail. The majority of the voters oppose unlimited abortion, which is how Bush finally got Roberts and Alito confirmed—by backing the Dems against the wall.

I just don’t see McCain doing that sort of thing. The only people he enjoys screwing are conservatives.


30 posted on 03/28/2008 9:46:11 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
Conservatives in general may be in for a rough time, not just in Colorado. I saw a study last year that reported that 53% of Americans now say they get a significant portion of their income from the government, it's also true that the top 20% of Americans pay most of the income taxes collected each year. The people who vote for Democrats are voting to give themselves other people's money, hard to see it stopping until the money runs out.
31 posted on 03/28/2008 9:53:20 AM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Easy to say after the fact. Souter was appointed as a “stealth” candidate, under the assumption that a recognized conservative would be borked. His patron from New Hampshire vouched for him as a covert conservative—and either was fooled, or lied about it, nobody knows for sure.

Souter’s true colors only emerged after he got on the court.

There was one rule for the Democrats—appoint anyone you like and we’ll confirm her—and another for the Republicans—be bipartisan, or we’ll stonewall you. I just don’t think McCain is going to fight that. I’d love to be proven wrong, but his political history, especially in the last decade, is not encouraging.


32 posted on 03/28/2008 9:53:34 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old North State

I think the statistics you quote indicates more that the distribution of wealth is such that there is no longer a middle class. Many people who previously could pay for health care, food, gas, utilities and housing have reached a point that inflation has outstripped their pay and the credit card buffer is all used up. There is no longer an incentive to support the status quo when people can no longer succeed in playing the game.

The top 20% may be paying the taxes, but they also have all the wealth. Your statistics show that a tipping point has been reached where the majority of Americans aren’t able to make it in the current economy and system. This means the election may see the ice burg roll over as people are enticed by the Democrat promise of greener pastures.


33 posted on 03/28/2008 10:03:34 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: OESY
It's simple--the libs are spreading far and wide, like a cancer. They are not simply staying put in one area. They moved from MA to NH and made it a lib state, slowly. Californians did the same to Oregon. Florida is getting ever more liberal, especially as the libs from NY that move there live longer.

They imported Mexicans into SoCal to turn it from a conservative base into a leftist province. They are moving to Montana, Colorado, Idaho.

Public education accellerates the process. Children of conservatives can be turned with 12 years of state propaganda and a healthy dose of TV. It takes an extraordinary amount of parenting to raise a child who understands the world from a conservative, pro-family, religious, traditional American point of view when they are 20, and to keep them that way after they finish college.

Conservatives need to understand that their ability to influence this nation is in danger of disappearing. Just a few more states go into lib control, and we will be a permanent minority. The civil war was fought because the south was going to lose ability to control of the federal government, once the territories came in as free states. We are about to be in the same position, but in a better cause.

It is important to have a strategy for reversing this trend while we can. That means gaining control of the federal government with Conservatives in charge within the next few years, before amnesty passes and before another 10 years worth of kids raised at government schools reaches voting age. It means having conservative leaders who are teachers, who explain what they are doing and why, and who convince people of the correctness of their policies. Reagan made people conservative, he didn't get elected because they were conservative to begin with. With a conservative government, we can reform the judiciary, reduce spending, begin a long, multi-generational process of regaining control of the institutions, which are wholly the province of the left. Perhaps, with a little luck, we can take the country back from marxism. But right now, we are not looking like the horse to bet on.

34 posted on 03/28/2008 10:03:50 AM PDT by Defiant (McCain's big vein drains mainly from his brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
A few rich Democrats...some local, some out of state...poured a good deal of money into the Colorado to take over the state legislature. It was a great use of money because state congressional races are low budget in comparison to what it takes to elect a US Senator and/or Representative. The Democrats were able to flood their district with mailings and phone calls and the Republican candidates did not have the money or the organization to do so.

It is a lesson Republicans should learn from. And freepers, too. Give some money to your local candidates...and volunteer for them too. A little time and money can make a lot of difference...especially in suburban districts that are too big for people to personally know either candidate...and where races are are not terribly well covered. A cheerful volunteer walking the neighborhood and handing out literature on behalf of a candidate for the state legislature could be the only personal touch a citizen gets...and he just might remember the candidates name when he steps into the voting booth.

Too often, we get caught up in the national races because they run the ads and get our blood boiling. This year, with conservatives unhappy with McCain, is a good time to concentrate on the local races.

35 posted on 03/28/2008 10:21:52 AM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

BTTT!


36 posted on 03/28/2008 10:46:03 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch

I agree- if we are going to have good consevative candidates in the future we must nurture them in local, then statewide races. A talented conservative state legislator is a future talented governor and then hopefully a great conservative president. The alternative is the mess we have in this election.


37 posted on 03/28/2008 10:51:12 AM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: marsh2
I disagree, Wealth income is not a major factor in current income for the vast majority of Americans, it is not a major factor in the amount of income extracted from the American people. The ability of people to meet current expenses is not related in any significant way to wealth distribution. Most Americans are in the middle class and the overwhelming amount of money collected in taxes is from the middle class. Middle class Americans have never earned more income than they do right now.
What has changed is the number of people receiving entitlements and who employed directly or indirectly by government, it has never been greater than 50% until now. People who feed from the government trough are unlikely to vote to contain it, the tipping point is reached when there are more people(voters) taking from the trough then there are filling it. Recall the often quoted phrase, ‘democracy will fail when the people realize that they can vote themselves money from the public purse’, I think they have figured it out.
38 posted on 03/28/2008 11:29:17 AM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: OESY
WE have lost the west many times before. some of this is just by holding the Presidency for 6 years. After 1974 we lost every Governorship out there including Wyoming Idaho and Utah. We had lost more Senate seats to. We need to watch it and keep out ears to the ground and feel what is going on. But, we do not need to panic and be defeatist either.
39 posted on 03/28/2008 3:53:59 PM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

CO was a prime example of BAD RINO leadership. You’d be amazed what one lousy RINO Governor can do to a party in short order. Owens took a Republican state and turned it rodent. Lost the legislature on his watch, the Governorship, and the majority of Congressional seats.


40 posted on 03/28/2008 6:51:18 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~***Just say NO to the "O"***~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

btt


41 posted on 03/29/2008 2:27:57 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson