Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZacandPook
It was Ken who years ago told me the FBI’s theory. Ed never even bothered to ask him who he understood the FBI suspected.

It is totally absurd to believe that the FBI would tell Ken Alibek who they suspect sent the anthrax letters.

It is just as absurd to believe that Postal Inspectors would tell "BattleAxe" who they suspect sent the anthrax letters.

Federal investigators gather information, they don't distribute information.

If there is any need to tell an outsider anything, a good investigator will tell that outsider only what will help them gather more information, and that includes simply agreeing with whatever the person being questioned says.

Ed at www.anthraxinvestigation.com

81 posted on 04/03/2008 7:57:46 AM PDT by EdLake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: EdLake

Ed, one knows what the FBI suspects both from the questions they ask and the affidavits they swear out saying what they suspect. For the affidavit, see the September 3, 2006 “Hardball in an Era of Threats” in the Washington Post concerning the affidavits relating to the search of Al-Timimi’s residence two weeks after the blind sheik’s son was captured. Federal investigators and prosecutors tell me a lot. Maybe they just don’t have any confidence in you.
I’ve spoken to many of the GMU faculty and students. There has been an entire thesis written on this subject of the infiltration of GMU (using a “red team” or “red cell” approach). Heck, an FBI analyst on Amerithrax was one of Ken’s students and wrote a 671 or so thesis on anthrax. If you haven’t read it, you really should.


84 posted on 04/03/2008 11:47:27 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson