Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Set on Self-Destruct [David Limbaugh]
NewsMax ^ | April 1, 2008 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 04/01/2008 6:06:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Democrats seemed determined to convert their sunny 2008 forecast into a perfect storm, which only can be diverted if either the approaching Obama front or Clinton front dissipates soon or changes directions to join forces with the other via the proverbial "dream ticket."

Until Pastor Wright managed to become Obama's potentially career-shattering albatross, Obama looked unstoppable, indeed superhuman. But as has happened repeatedly in this campaign, Hillary's persistence was rewarded — briefly, anyway. Obama's long and close association with the incendiary pastor undercut his perceived ability to rise above both race and party.

With the passage of a little time, though, Obama appears to have recovered. Or are his rising poll numbers merely a result of Hillary's umpteenth gratuitous tall tale?

It's hard to imagine that Obama's 52 to 42 percent national lead among Democrats, his narrowing of the superdelegate gap, and his lopsided acquisition of endorsements since Super Tuesday (64 to nine) are the result solely of Hillary's fraudulent assertion of sniper-tested heroism.

It's more likely that concerns about Obama's association with Wright have diminished with the cessation of a 24/7 news cycle devoted to it. The mainstream media's reversion to Obama adoration following his dreamy post-Wright lecture on race in America hasn't hurt him, either.

That said, if Hillary wasn't deterred before — when her prospects looked even worse — why would she be now? She has to believe, along with many, many others, that the Wright story has legs.

But the dirty little secret is that the Democratic left, which wields enormous power in the party, probably isn't much troubled by Wright's anti-American and racist diatribes or Obama's arguably tacit endorsement of them.

Don't forget that it wasn't the Democratic left that threw Howard Dean overboard. Nor did the party reject Dean's message; they just deemed him unelectable, and the media reinforced that perception.

Interestingly, the same thing hasn't happened yet to Obama. Since the initial Wright shock wore off, there has been no sustained mass exodus from Obama. Yet his association with Wright, along with other disturbing stories beginning to surface out there, could render him as unelectable in the general election as Howard Dean in his worst screaming moment.

Why is Obama weathering this storm? Is it political correctness; are Democrats cutting him extra slack because of his race? Is it that they are in denial about his increasing baggage because they so crave a party deliverer who speaks their language? Is it because they aren't viscerally repulsed by Wright's hate speech or Michelle Obama's apparent grievances against this nation? Or is it that they have no one even as electable as John Kerry waiting in the wings — considering Hillary's permanent and ever-increasing negatives?

I suspect it's a combination of all those factors, which doesn't bode well for the party. Hillary is not in as good a position to capitalize on an Obama implosion as Kerry was to exploit the Dean political suicide. Everyone, including formerly ardent Clinton supporters, now realizes that for the Clintons, it's all about the Clintons, who'll do anything to win. "Anything" includes playing a despicable brand of racial politics and betraying the Democrats' unwavering, albeit disingenuous battle cry since Bush-Gore 2000: "Every vote must count."

The leftist blogs are getting ever-more vicious against Hillary and increasingly indignant over any criticisms of their would-be champion, Obama. After all, what good did it do for them to settle for Kerry last time? They've been waiting a long time now for a full-blown anti-war standard-bearer.

So Democrats are faced with the dilemma of sticking with Obama, who truly might be approaching unelectability, or turning to the obnoxious and narcissistic power couple for whom the magic has long since disappeared.

If Obama does well from this point forward, the superdelegates will have no choice but to endorse him because even concerns of electability would not justify the divisions, including along racial lines, that would ensue should the party brokers cashier him. If Hillary marginally, but not significantly, outperforms Obama, the same principles will apply.

Only if Hillary wins consistently and decisively from now on, to the point of overtaking Obama in the popular vote, will she have the slightest chance of credibly arguing that superdelegates should go her way. Even then, unless Obama fully gets on board a Hillary ticket, especially by way of the second slot, there will be hell to pay in the party for years.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Limbaugh is a writer, author, and attorney. His book "Bankrupt: The Intellectual and Moral Bankruptcy of Today's Democratic Party" was released recently in paperback. To find out more about David Limbaugh, please visit his Web site at www.davidlimbaugh.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidlimbaugh; democrat; democraticparty; democratparty; democrats
I predict the convention will nominate Al Gore, with Obama as his running mate.
1 posted on 04/01/2008 6:06:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Hill & BO can’t get along, what hope is there for a pure Dem Congress/WH?

The TRUE underbelly of the Dems is exposed — balkanized, political in-fighting.

They’ve managed to put on a thin veneer of “political unity” for a number of years. That’s gone - the reality’s exposed during this primary.


2 posted on 04/01/2008 6:10:08 PM PDT by 4Liberty (U.S. Income Tax laws are enforced... but Immigration laws aren't = global tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Like I said in my other post no matter who gets elected it will be a rough 4 years ahead. Only less so with McQueeg.


3 posted on 04/01/2008 6:10:15 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

With all the growing religious fervor of the Left, I suppose Algore is a possibility. With the contest this year to see which party can have the most meaningful meltdown, why don’t the Democrats just nominate McCain and get it over with?


4 posted on 04/01/2008 6:13:26 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I want to know why everyone here thinks Obama is unelectable? McCain goes into this without a good chunk of the base electorate that Bush had. While seven months await, the economy is in a downturn, ripe pickings for Obama's Marxism masquerading as Populism. Even with the surge Iraq is unpopular and success there too dependent on an Iraqi leadership that inspires little confidence.

All in all I suspect the other Limbaugh is either overly optimistic or is simply whistling past a graveyard.

5 posted on 04/01/2008 6:23:12 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Al Gore leaves his lucrative global warming scam to lose the presidency again?

God. I wish.


6 posted on 04/01/2008 6:24:33 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Freepers don't let Freepers get spun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I predict the convention will nominate Al Gore, with Obama as his running mate.”

I would think an Obama/Gore ticket would be more likely as I believe Obama will get the nomination before convention.


7 posted on 04/01/2008 6:40:59 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Because Obama has no qualifications and is the most radical person ever to run for the presidency. So far left, that a vast majority of the country will be repelled by his views and voting record.

At least that’s what we hope will happen.


8 posted on 04/01/2008 6:53:36 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

I want to know why everyone here thinks Obama is unelectable?

I don’t know about “Everyone” but Obama has a number of negative factors intrinsic to his candidacy that will impede him in November.

In fact, I do believe that he is as unelectable as Dean was.


9 posted on 04/01/2008 7:00:06 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Prepare for the worst, it won’t get much better, although President McDole does threaten to veto ‘pork barrel’ spending...


10 posted on 04/01/2008 7:18:54 PM PDT by Son House (Democrat High Tax Rates Suppress Opportunity and Jobs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I predict Hillary will lose PA and drop out shortly after that.

She shot herself in the head with a sniper rifle and she’s oozing green slime all over the place.

Demonrats want her GONE.


11 posted on 04/01/2008 7:32:40 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Because McCain, though disliked by conservatives, is a good middle-of-the-road candidate.

Given the very leftist tilt of Obama and his anti-white bias, McCain should get most of the independents and a good chunk of the blue-collar union guys, who are a lot less enamored of educated blacks as the latte part of the Democratic Party.

12 posted on 04/01/2008 7:50:50 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If the Democrats would merely self-destruct, it would be no problem—in fact, a welcome event. However, they are determined to destroy the United States along with themselves. That’s why they must be stopped.


13 posted on 04/01/2008 7:54:47 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
the dirty little secret is that the Democratic left, which wields enormous power in the party, probably isn't much troubled by Wright's anti-American and racist diatribes or Obama's arguably tacit endorsement of them.

Two words: Howard Dean.

14 posted on 04/01/2008 8:28:55 PM PDT by GVnana ("They're still analyzing the first guy. What do I have to worry about?" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Both major political parties are set on self-destruct!


15 posted on 04/01/2008 8:37:10 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Vote for conservatives AT ALL POLITICAL LEVELS! Encourage all others to do the same on November 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: xkaydet65
McCain goes into this without a good chunk of the base electorate that Bush had.

Back that up with data from the primaries.

17 posted on 04/02/2008 3:09:05 AM PDT by Jim Noble (I've got a home in Glory Land that outshines the sun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

...”Why is Obama weathering this storm? Is it political correctness; are Democrats cutting him extra slack because of his race?”...

Yes, they are. Obama has put himself into an unassailable position using his half-blackness as a shield, and as a foil. It is truly a nauseating spectacle, watching Obama sycophants defending his “pastor” and his anti-American, anti-white rants. This from the party of tolerance and acceptance, no less.


18 posted on 04/02/2008 6:18:16 AM PDT by astounded (The Democrat Party is a Clear and Present Danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Like I said in my other post no matter who gets elected it will be a rough 4 years ahead. Only less so with McQueeg.

As I've said here before, it's a choice between being bitted by a copperhead (McQueeg), a rattler (Clinton), or a cottonmouth (the Mudslime). The copperhead being usually less venomous than either of the other two, I'll probably hold my nose and put my hand into its cage.

19 posted on 04/02/2008 7:33:02 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson