Skip to comments.
Clinton Testimony on FBI Files Blocked
Brietbart ^
Posted on 04/02/2008 8:47:10 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Uh...I wonder who appointed this judge...
2
posted on
04/02/2008 8:48:30 AM PDT
by
Signalman
To: Sub-Driver
Dare I ask who appointed this Federal Judge?
3
posted on
04/02/2008 8:48:56 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Sub-Driver
Well isn’t that special. She must have a file on this Federal Judge. It never ends.
4
posted on
04/02/2008 8:49:15 AM PDT
by
poobear
(Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
To: Sub-Driver
OK, so who was the Federal Judge, and who appointed him/her?
To: Sub-Driver
6
posted on
04/02/2008 8:50:06 AM PDT
by
Eurale
To: Bobkk47
26 seconds.... you beat my post by 26 seconds!
7
posted on
04/02/2008 8:50:08 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Sub-Driver
Notice they didn’t bother to give us the NAME of the Judge. Isn’t it a conflict of interest to have a Judge, who was probably appointed by her husband, ruling on her behalf?
8
posted on
04/02/2008 8:50:43 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
To: Sub-Driver
what was the reason for blocking her testimony?
We KNOW the FBI files were taken, so bring the whole lot of them back into court and ask again- who ordered it? who received the files? what happened to them after that?
In the Nixon administration one person went to jail for having possession of JUST ONE FBI file. The Clintoons had 900!
9
posted on
04/02/2008 8:51:42 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: MNJohnnie
Notice they didnt bother to give us the NAME of the Judge. Isnt it a conflict of interest to have a Judge, who was probably appointed by her husband, ruling on her behalf? No, but this decision will be reversed on appeal.
To: Dixie Yooper; Bobkk47
I went to post that very salient question on the breitbart comments link and wonder of wonders, it’s not working.
11
posted on
04/02/2008 8:54:02 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(Could pacifists exist if there weren't people brave enough to go to war for their right to exist?)
To: Sub-Driver
Too bad. My real question is how many of these FBI files she has access to may have information on the SuperDelegates that Bill is trying to “persuade” to cast their vote for Hillary?
12
posted on
04/02/2008 8:55:42 AM PDT
by
Harley
(Defeat Obama, Osama and Chelsea's Mama.)
To: Sub-Driver
Well, of course, she is the QUEEN BEE. WE are the little people, we would HAVE to testify. And we would actually be found guilty and thrown into prison. I wonder how many FBI files she has on the DNC Super delegates???????
13
posted on
04/02/2008 8:56:42 AM PDT
by
buffyt
(Glowbull warming/Climate Change - the biggest hoax/fraud/deception of the 21st century.)
To: Harley
HEY YOU BEAT ME TO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL
14
posted on
04/02/2008 8:57:06 AM PDT
by
buffyt
(Glowbull warming/Climate Change - the biggest hoax/fraud/deception of the 21st century.)
To: Bobkk47
Source"Judge Royce C. Lamberth, a Reagan appointee"
15
posted on
04/02/2008 8:57:12 AM PDT
by
michigander
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: poobear
No Doubt! and I don’t mean THE BAND.
16
posted on
04/02/2008 8:58:02 AM PDT
by
buffyt
(Glowbull warming/Climate Change - the biggest hoax/fraud/deception of the 21st century.)
To: michigander
I know one of the people who’s file was at the WH....the circumstances were very interesting as to why that file was requested.
To: Sub-Driver
18
posted on
04/02/2008 9:01:56 AM PDT
by
shove_it
(and have a nice day)
To: Sub-Driver
That is about the ugliest picture I have ever seen. Did he really sleep with that?
19
posted on
04/02/2008 9:02:12 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: MNJohnnie
"Isnt it a conflict of interest to have a Judge, who was probably appointed by her husband, ruling on her behalf?" You'd think so. An honest judge with any moral integrity would recuse themselves. But in the corrupt Democrat stacked adgenda driven judicial system we have in place now those appointees are there just for reasons like this..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson