Jena 2007
Little Rock 1957
Posted on 04/04/2008 12:32:50 PM PDT by moderatewolverine
Near the end of his life, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. felt cornered and under siege. His opposition to the Vietnam War was widely criticized, even by friends. He was being pressured both to repudiate the black power movement and to embrace it. Some of his lieutenants were urging him to jettison his urgent new campaign to uplift the poor, believing that King had taken on too much and was compromising support for the civil rights struggle.
(Excerpt) Read more at primetimepolitics.com ...
Dr. King: Rainbow Coalition as Filet Mignon: Big Mac
40 years ago.....it was my 17th Birthday.....
Happy birthday!
Why, Thank you!
I was about your age then and I remember 1968 as a mess. Tet, King Assasination, Kennedy Assasination, Soviets invaded Chech., USS Pueblo, Riots , Rat Convention in Chicago, etc.
May Denver be remembered as the Convention that made Chicago look like a pic-nic.
40 years ago I was a kid at Bible College, just about to embark on a choir tour of Eastern Tennessee churches in small towns. We made our tour under armed escort, meeting curfews and large law officer presence in every town we visited. And the one thing that our Northern eyes (85% of this Tennessee school was from New York and New Jersey) could not quite comprehend was the way that the Black community expressed itself in looting, shooting, riot and fire. Later that year when Robert Kennedy was shot, and still later when George Wallace met the same fate, we noticed that White people did not respond by looting, shooting, riot and fire.
As I grew up and moved to various cities about the country, I noticed that this response held true to type. White people did not loot, shoot, riot and burn. Black people did. In fact Andrew Young, the Obama of Atlanta, opined during the Great Northeastern Blackout in 1971, “Well if you turn out the lights, Black folks are gonna steal.” And of course New Orleans is the latest in that long series of responses to catastrophe and disaster. They aren’t drawn together by tragedy. They are flung outward to destroy not only their own communities, but everything they can reach.
Forty years later I am still not at all sure why this is.
I was at the UNH radio station when the news came in. Bells were ringing on the wire service machine. Something important was happening for sure. As I recall, it was a Thursday and Easter weekend was upon us.
Not to worry. He ain't gonna be president. At least not this time.
40 years ago my father was 13.
My guess is that if opened, they will reveal someone who was a pathetically desperate womanizer who would make Eliot Spitzer look chaste, a cynical political manipulator, and a willing agent of influence of the Soviet Union who was in constant contact with Communist Party assets in this country. If my guess is correct, the contents of those files would prove embarrassing to 1) many of his associates; 2) to liberals who depend on racial victimization as a campaign identity, and 3) to Mr. King's family, who seem to derive much of their income from licensing his writings and image.
Avoiding the displeasure of these groups and their political allies in the squishy, guilty world of U.S. politics, trumps the truth. There may some other reason for sealing those records, but I don't know what it could be.
I agree. Obama isn't have the half the man MLK was!
40 years ago I remember blacks in Memphis beating up whites because they were white and burning and looting white businesses. They were so out of control the Governor had to send in the National Guard. Ten years later during the summer of 1978 the blacks repeated the act.
Happened also in New Brunswick, NJ, DC (my dad was called up from Ft. Knox by LBJ for that one), and about 200 other cities that day.
1968 was a tough year. Some here have said they would like a repeat, but they are thinking only of the Dem Convention. We don’t need a repeat of all that.
Uh, were you in Newark, NEW JERSEY just a year earlier? My granparents/Aunts/Uncles could tell you about National Guardsmen driving trucks up their street to take care of the rampaging thugs, er, rioters.
By 1968, urban riots had become a cliche. The two worst were in 1967 (Newark, NJ and Detroit, MI).
Yes....I remember most of that, EXCEPT I CANNOT remember a thing about the Democratic Convention....guess it wasn’t on my radar. Ah....now I remember why....I spent that summer working as a waitress in Yellowstone Park.....we didn’t have TV’s
New Jersey distinguished itself forever by shooting looters.
No, we don’t need a repeat; but if the Rats take the White House and keep both houses of congress, we might see some CONSECUTIVE years like 1968 or worse.
Its also interesting that we "Celebrate" MLK TWICE a year! First on his birthday, and then on the day he was assassinated.
The country got eight years of reprieve with Reagan. We’re running on the grace of God now.
And (per my great-uncle who was a city of Newark cop at the time) having the NPD and the National Guard SHOOT AT EACHOTHER due to a lack of communication between the two.
All those rioters burning down Springfield Avenue were only clearing land for the big box retailers who now line said avenue up to the Irvington line.
Exactly. I’m going to borrow that from you. Thank you.
It’s yours. Not very original but I don’t mind saying it.
One of the more comical scenes of the Trenton riot happenened when the looters hit a sporting goods store on Broad Street. They actually started hitting golfballs at the TPD, according to my ex-Trentonian barber.
NJ had several riots between 64-69: Newark, Trenton, Paterson, New Brunswick (MLK), Plainfield (cop got killed with his own gun in that one), Hackensack (MLK), Englewood, and TWO riots in Camden (one black, one Puerto Rican).
You forgot "Black History Month".
On the Sunday before MLK Day, my priest carried on with the typical gushing praise of King during his homily. I sent him a long email noting King's horrible moral leadership that plagues black America to this day. King’s lapses in moral leadership have had as profound an impact as did his championing of civil rights.
“An awful loss...”
Why is that? MLK was a drugged out skirt-chasing racist that accepted money from the Communist Party. You’ve been brainwashed by the new history books at the indoctrination centers of America (Public Schools).
I think you might just be correct. It would be nice to learn that we are both wrong but I don’t think it’ll work out that way.
68, We got a Karmann Ghia and a 33ft Owens sportfisherman. We’d go out every Saturday for Bonito. Pretty good times.
My guess is that if opened, they will reveal someone who was a pathetically desperate womanizer who would make Eliot Spitzer look chaste, a cynical political manipulator, and a willing agent of influence of the Soviet Union....
You're right. MLK frequented prostitutes. In fact, during his trip to Sweden to accept the Nobel Peace Prize, he and his entourage were enjoying the companies of prostitutes in their hotel rooms. It is fortunate that he died the way he died. Otherwise, the dirt would have come out. Now, he is declared a saint.
The neighborhood was compelled to organize a militia. My father joined with them and they warded off any gangs at gunpoint from our cul-de-sac. I don't remember any details because I was so young. My father would sometimes bring up the story from time to time up until he passed on.
And mind you, considering how he raised me to be so open minded about race, the man was absolutely no racist. He just hated @ssholes. There were plenty of them that night.
I wish to make it clear that I think that Martin Luther King was a man of enormous courage, charisma, and intellect that profoundly altered the course of American history and made it a better country in so far has its promise of justice for all is concerned.
This does not mean however that his legacy to the Civil Rights movement has been one of unalloyed good. I believe much of his bequeathment resulted in an over reliance on big government statist solutions to problems within the black community that require individual initiatives to correct. Martin Luther King’s frequent references to this nation’s founding documents are well known. His reflections on Communism are much less well known and undoubtedly contributed to his general philosophy. We owe it to ourselves to examine the effects of this legacy and contextualize it so has to solve the problems facing the black community today.
While King himself was not a communist, he did business with communists and was influenced by them. This delicate subject, made more so given the martyrdom and subsequent lionization of King, should nevertheless be broached as a means of providing insight into some of the darker forces that worked their way into what was essentially a pro American, conservative, Christian civil rights movement.
King surrounded himself with communists from the beginning of his career. His closest advisor Stanley Levison was a Communist. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, formed in 1957 and led by King, had Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth as Vice President who was at the same time president of the Southern Conference Education Fund, an identified communist front according to the Legislative Committee on un-American Activities, Louisiana (Report April 13, 1964 pp. 31-38). The field director of SCEF was Carl Braden, a known communist agitator who was also involved in the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, which counted Lee Harvey Oswald, the communist assassin of President Kennedy as a member. King maintained regular correspondence with Carl Braden. Bayard Rustin, a known communist, was also on the board of SCLC.
Dr. King addressed the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tenn., 1957, previously known as the Commonwealth College until the House Committee on un-American Activities sited it as a communist front (April 27, 1949). HCAA found that Commonwealth was using religion as a way to infiltrate the African-American community by, among other techniques, comparing New Testament texts to those of Karl Marx. King knew many communists associated with the Highlander school.
King hired communist official Hunter Pitts O’Dell, 1960, at the SCLC. The St. Louis Globe Democrat reported (Oct. 26, 1962) “A Communist has infiltrated the top administrative post in the Rev. Martin Luther King’s SCLC. He is Jack H. O’Dell, acting executive director of conference activities in the southeastern states including Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana.” Dr. King fired O’Dell when this became public but subsequently rehired him to head the SCLC New York office.
King himself expresses a Marxist outlook in his book “Stride Toward Freedom” when he stated, “in spite of the shortcomings of his analysis, Marx had raised some basic questions. I was deeply concerned from my early teen days about the gulf between superfluous wealth and abject poverty, and my reading of Marx made me even more conscious of this gulf. Although modern American capitalism has greatly reduced the gap through social reforms, there was still need for a better distribution of wealth. Moreover, Marx had revealed the danger of the profit motive as the sole basis of an economic system”
King, unfortunately, didn’t understand that it was Capitalism and freedom that was responsible for the successes the African-American community already had achieved in his day and the key to future success. By “better distribution of wealth” King meant state control over the economy. His contempt for “the profit motive” was unfortunate given that African-Americans should’ve been encouraged by their leaders to seek fair profit to the best of their ability. King’s leftist ideas contributed to an opening of the floodgates to such radicals as Stokley Carmichael, H. Rap Brown, the Black Panthers, as well as the burning and looting of African-American neighborhoods, the institutionalizing of poverty perpetrating welfare, the destruction of the family, drugs, violence, racism, and crime.
In “Stride Toward Freedom” Dr. King states “In short, I read Marx as I read all of the influential historical thinkers from a dialectical point of view, combining a partial yea and a partial no. My readings of Marx convinced me that truth is found neither in Marxism nor in traditional capitalism. Each represents a partial truth. Historically capitalism failed to see truth in collective enterprise and Marxism failed to see the truth in individual enterprise. The Kingdom of God is neither the thesis of individual enterprise nor the antithesis of collective enterprise, but a synthesis which reconciles the truths of both.”
King, like Marx, Lenin, and Stalin, had “a dialectical point of view.” The goal of the dialectic is authoritarianism. A nation, to paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, cannot be half free and half slave. By advocating socialism, King chose an imperious stand toward his own people in contrast to a stand for genuine freedom, self-rule, self-sufficiency, private ownership, and the accumulation of capital. King did not advocate the American system of free market capitalism. Instead, he stood for a system that has stunted the growth of African-Americans as well as the rest of us.
All Marxists believe in Hegelian Dialectics. This is a belief that “progress” is achieved through conflict between opposing viewpoints. Any ideological assertion (thesis) will create its own opposite (antithesis). Progress is achieved when a conclusion (synthesis) is reached which espouses aspects of both the thesis and antithesis.
For example, Hitler had a dialectical point of view. He rejected Marxist class warfare, but embraced the basic socialist idea of the insignificance of the individual compared to the collective state.
This belief in dialectical progress is why liberals pit the rich against the poor, old against young, black against white, men against women, gay against straight, ad nauseam.
This issue is somewhat clouded by what Dr. King wrote in his 1957 book “Stride toward Freedom: the Montgomery story”, in which he wrote the following devastating critique of the sort of communism practiced in the Communist super state of the Union of Soviet Socialist republics.
“During the Christmas holidays of 1949 I decided to spend my spare time reading Karl Marx to try to understand the appeal of communism for many people. For the first time I carefully scrutinized *Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto. I also read some interpretive works on the thinking of Marx and Lenin. In reading such Communist writings I drew certain conclusions that have remained with me as convictions to this day.
First, I rejected their materialistic interpretation of history. Communism, avowedly secularist and materialistic, has no place for God. This I could never accept, for as a Christian, I believe that there is a creative personal power in the universe who is the ground and essence of all reality-a power that cannot be explained in materialistic terms. History is ultimately guided by spirit, not matter.
Second, I strongly disagreed with communism’s ethical relativism. Since for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything-force, violence murder, lying-is a justifiable means to the ‘millennial’ end. This type of relativism was abhorrent to me. Constructive ends can never give absolute moral justification to destructive means, because in the final analysis the end is pre-existent in the means.
Third, I opposed communism’s political totalitarianism. In communism, the individual ends up in subjection to the state. True, the Marxists would argue that the state is an ‘interim’ reality which is to be eliminated when the classless society emerges; but the state is the end while it lasts, and man is only a means to that end. And if man’s so-called rights and liberties stand in the way of that end, they are simply swept aside. His liberties of expression, his freedom to vote, and his freedom to listen to what news he likes or to choose his books are all restricted. Man becomes hardly more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state.
This deprecation of individual freedom was objectionable to me. I am convinced now, as I was then, that man is an end because he is a child of God. Man is not made for the state; the state is made for man. To deprive man of freedom is to relegate him to the status of a thing, rather than elevate him to the status of a person. Man must never be treated as means to the end of the state; but always as an end within himself.”
Martin Luther King Jr., *Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story* (New York: Harper and Row, 1957), 92-93
Let us not forget that the above was written in 1957, a period in which the oppressions of the Soviet Union are painfully evident, evidenced by the brutal repression of the Hungarian uprising in 1956. At the time Stride toward Freedom was written, domestic attitudes toward communism could not have been more hostile. Toward the end of Dr. Martin Luther King’s life, the counterculture revolution of the sixties and the leftist tinted civil rights movement made favorable considerations of communism generally more palatable.
While Martin Luther King Day should be one of reflection and appreciation for what has been accomplished, and a reckoning of what still needs to be done, it should also be a day of understanding, in terms clear of emotionally driven rhetoric, where the civil rights movement went wrong. A major key to this understanding, I would contend, is the destructive effects that communist ideas and outright infiltration has had on the African-American community. Communists tried to use African-Americans as cannon fodder by stoking hatred and racial division. A predominantly white left-wing establishment promoted Black communists in order to preserve an informal system of oppression.
The fact is that he WAS a socialist and that goes to the heart of what went wrong with the civil rights establishment after the legal battles against codified discrimination were won.
I am a black man who has been getting callouses on my dome from butting heads with those in my community who refuse to relinquish big government statist solutions for the problems plaquing the black community in favor of free market solutions that are far more appropriate today. These forces frequently cite Dr. King and use his exhortations to government to lead the way. They specifically cite his socialist outlook as justification for their continuance. The two parent black family was destroyed by LBJ’s welfare state. That was the worst cultural calamity to EVER befall the black community in the US, and the most destructive force in it’s cultural life notwithstanding the imposition of Jim Crow law via the Supreme Court’s Plessy v Fergueson decision. MLK was a leading proponent for expanding the welfare state, whose baleful effects were just beginning to be seen in the black community.
MLK was a man of enormous charisma and courage and certainly a pivotal figure in the civil rights movement. There is much about him that I admire. An assesment of his life could creditably yield the adjective of great. Despite that, he does not deserve to be the ONLY American with his own holiday named after him. That honor should be reserved for only one person in American history, the greatest of all Americans, George Washington. More so than any other SINGLE figure in our history, he was the “indispensable man.” Without his courage, acumen, honor, and integrity, the US would simply not exist, and if it did, it probably would have been as a monarchy and certainly not as a constitutional republic.
MLK’s birthday was a sop to PC and a reflection of the DemocRAT Congress that voted it. The depth of MLK’s association with the most anti-freedom ideology (Communism)of our time will prove to very embarrassing when it is fully revealed. Additionally, MLK’s legacy to the modern day civil rights movement is a socialist bequeathment, that of looking to big government solutions for many of the behavioral problems in today’s black community. MLK continues to cast a long shadow over most of the modern day civil rights establishment and black politicians who largely reject free market, educationally based solutions to the unique problems plaguing the black community.
Yeah....really.....
Absolutely true, and it's so sad that Americans of all colors cannot see this. The foundation of success and happiness is the family, not government handouts.
35% of all abortions in this country are performed on the 13% who are black. Where's the outrage from Jessie Jackson about denying those kids their most fundamental civil right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.