Posted on 04/10/2008 11:58:45 AM PDT by AFA-Michigan
...Condoleezza Rice described herself as "mildly pro-choice." ...(T)here is nothing "mild" about having your arms and legs ripped off your body in that "choice" we call abortion.
...Washington Times correspondent Bill Sammon pressed Rice, "But it sounds like you do not wish to change the laws that now allow (abortion). ..."
Rice responded, "Well, I don't spend my entire life thinking about these issues. What I do think is that we should not have the federal government in a position where it is forcing its views on one side or the other."
...Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, summarized Rice's activities as head of the State Department with a Dec. 28, 2006, letter protesting the U.S. vote to give three radical homosexual groups official U.N. status.
Among the homosexual groups granted official...U.N. status was the Danish National Association for Gays and Lesbians, which supports homosexual "marriage," forced homosexual adoption and laws that would force churches to "bless" homosexual unions. Under Rice's direction, the U.S. also voted to recognize the International Lesbian and Gay Federation, which was linked to the North American Man/Boy Love Association and has refused to condemn adult-child sex.
...Then, on Oct. 10, 2006, Secretary Rice administered the oath of office for the global AIDS coordinator, homosexual activist Mark Dybul, while Dybul's domestic partner held the Bible.
...Rice then (publicly) introduced first lady Laura Bush to Dybul's domestic partner's mother as Dybul's "mother in law." This is only "mildly" at odds with the Federal Defense of Marriage Act...declaring that the federal government shall not recognize "marriage" between two men. Obviously, Secretary Rice doesn't "spend her entire life thinking about federal law" on that issue, either "mildly speaking."
...I am categorically, vehemently, emphatically and intensely opposed to Condoleezza Rice for vice president
to put it "mildly."
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
http://sunlituplands.blogspot.com:80/2008/04/my-mild-opposition-to-condi-rice-for-vp.html
Thank you for that link!
It boggles my mind to think her name is even being considered.
I pray for McCain’s health.
regards,
Janice
As it stands right now, McCain could easily win this thing. Choosing Ms. Rice as his running mate could easily change all that. It’s all fine that she’s a black woman, but her views on cultural matters and no doubt on Supreme Court appointments are completely wrong. If we go for a running mate on the basis of race and/or sex, we’d be as stupid as Democrats. AND LOSE, TOO.
Rice for VP NO and Hell no.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.