Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING US to admit officially that Saddam WMDs were moved to Syria in a report to come !!!!!
Jerusalem Post ^ | 04 11 2008 | drzz

Posted on 04/11/2008 8:33:43 AM PDT by drzz

An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; breaking; bush; iaf; iran; iraq; pardes; saddam; sept6; syria; wmd; wmds; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last
To: drzz

The media and dims will simply ignore it, as it does not fit their agenda.


41 posted on 04/11/2008 8:51:11 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (feh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy

You put enough stuff out there even the MSM cant ignore it


42 posted on 04/11/2008 8:51:44 AM PDT by woofie (expert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
This should be interesting. The left will go absolutely nuts over this.

Why do you think the peanut man is REALLY going to Syria at THIS time?

To deliver, in person, the dimRAt strategy for doing all they can to help them - and to deliver state secrets on just what Israel and the U.S. knows and plans.

43 posted on 04/11/2008 8:52:27 AM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective
Why didn’t the CIA report this before?

The fact that it's packed full of civil service protected Carterites and Cliontonistas just might have something to do with that.

44 posted on 04/11/2008 8:52:31 AM PDT by fella (Is he al-taquiya or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drzz

ABOUT DAMN TIME!!!!!!


45 posted on 04/11/2008 8:53:58 AM PDT by Danae (Remember: Obama = Pull out from Iraq. PLAN on voting, or accept responsibility for the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
This should be interesting. The left will go absolutely nuts over this.

Nah...they'll dismiss it as lies and ignore it.

46 posted on 04/11/2008 8:54:31 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: drzz
This will be reported in the LA Times on page D-37, between the obituary of a 93-year old veterinarian and an ad for a colon cleanser.
47 posted on 04/11/2008 8:55:42 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

Unless it’s front-page news, it doesn’t matter. We all already know it’s true. But if it does become front-page news, then the objection to the war might become, “If the WMDs were in Syria, why did we attack Iraq?” However, if I remember correctly, Rumsfeld wanted to attack Syria during the first week of the invasion, but he was shot down by Bush and Rice.


48 posted on 04/11/2008 8:56:01 AM PDT by tlj18 (Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

About time. We’ve only known this for what, five years?


49 posted on 04/11/2008 8:56:49 AM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I’ll slow down so you can catch up...The America haters that believe that the WTC was an inside job will never believe that the WMDs were moved to Syria. They believe America to be the villain and deserving of attack and humiliation. Think Ward Churchill.


50 posted on 04/11/2008 8:57:03 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ConservaTexan
Anyone who doesn’t think the WTC was a ‘controlled demolition’ already knows this.

Unfortunately, that's a large number orf people.

And coming 6-7 months before the election, they'll all say "BS!"

51 posted on 04/11/2008 8:57:33 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: drzz

I strongly believe the UN helped buy him time to smuggle them out.
Hence why they kept stalling on the resolution votes.


52 posted on 04/11/2008 8:57:37 AM PDT by Larebil (My name is liberal backwards, since they backwards thinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

The Bush administration will admit that Saddam had nukes?

I will believe it when I see it.

We have had many documents posted on this forum that proved WMD. But the GOP and White House never talked about it.


53 posted on 04/11/2008 8:57:56 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Why has this taken so long? Why didn’t the CIA report this before?

Likely because to do so would have been to endanger operatives and/or compromise strategy. A sane America would have accepted the pre-war intelligence that there were trucks laden with who-knows-what headed to Syria, but the braying by Old Hippie America and its acolytes was so loud, and so constant, as to obfuscate anything but their wailing, amplified by the complicit mainstream media.

Seldom, if ever, in wartime has an Administration had to deal with such a traitorous segement of society, such a traitorous press and a such a traitorous Congress baying, "The President's a liar! There are no weapons! Waaaaaaah!"

Under the cold light of history, it may well be remembered that America's resolve in the 21st Century War on Terror was weakened to allow nothing more than a nostalgia trip for a bunch of long-in-the-tooth 20th Century hippies looking for one last "revolution" before they finally kicked the bucket.

As it was in the '60s and '70s, so it is today: These people are idiots, and if the pro-socialist press wasn't enabling them, they would have long ago been laughed out of existence.

54 posted on 04/11/2008 8:58:17 AM PDT by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drzz

Will the left call Israel liars?

Possible. They’re dumb enough..


55 posted on 04/11/2008 8:59:02 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

We will see.


56 posted on 04/11/2008 8:59:05 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW , Vote Hunter in the Primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: drzz

Yea, well lets see if one major publication or broadcast news source even bothers to mention this report when its released.


57 posted on 04/11/2008 8:59:22 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Why has this taken so long? Why didn't the CIA report this before?

Not thinking the 'worst' of them, the issue could be they had constant surveillance of where they were and they didn't want to tip off whomever had them to panic and hide them. They may have made the decision that as long as they were able to track them, they were not a threat. This may be why that 20 tons of nerve gas was so quickly captured several years ago.. they never did say where that originated from.

58 posted on 04/11/2008 9:00:12 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: drzz

I don’t believe it.

(I believe there were WMDs moved to Syria, always have, but I have a very hard time believing we’ll actually say it, and even if we do, the news will be silent and the Bush administration will let them.)


59 posted on 04/11/2008 9:00:16 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drzz

No way. The Dems told us that there were NO WMD in Iraq. Period. How could something that didn’t exist, be transferred by someone who wasn’t a threat to us? Nancy, Harry, Chris, Chuck, Dick, Obama, please explain?


60 posted on 04/11/2008 9:00:54 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson