Skip to comments.BREAKING US to admit officially that Saddam WMDs were moved to Syria in a report to come !!!!!
Posted on 04/11/2008 8:33:43 AM PDT by drzz
click here to read article
The media and dims will simply ignore it, as it does not fit their agenda.
You put enough stuff out there even the MSM cant ignore it
Why do you think the peanut man is REALLY going to Syria at THIS time?
To deliver, in person, the dimRAt strategy for doing all they can to help them - and to deliver state secrets on just what Israel and the U.S. knows and plans.
The fact that it's packed full of civil service protected Carterites and Cliontonistas just might have something to do with that.
ABOUT DAMN TIME!!!!!!
Nah...they'll dismiss it as lies and ignore it.
Unless it’s front-page news, it doesn’t matter. We all already know it’s true. But if it does become front-page news, then the objection to the war might become, “If the WMDs were in Syria, why did we attack Iraq?” However, if I remember correctly, Rumsfeld wanted to attack Syria during the first week of the invasion, but he was shot down by Bush and Rice.
About time. We’ve only known this for what, five years?
I’ll slow down so you can catch up...The America haters that believe that the WTC was an inside job will never believe that the WMDs were moved to Syria. They believe America to be the villain and deserving of attack and humiliation. Think Ward Churchill.
Unfortunately, that's a large number orf people.
And coming 6-7 months before the election, they'll all say "BS!"
I strongly believe the UN helped buy him time to smuggle them out.
Hence why they kept stalling on the resolution votes.
The Bush administration will admit that Saddam had nukes?
I will believe it when I see it.
We have had many documents posted on this forum that proved WMD. But the GOP and White House never talked about it.
Likely because to do so would have been to endanger operatives and/or compromise strategy. A sane America would have accepted the pre-war intelligence that there were trucks laden with who-knows-what headed to Syria, but the braying by Old Hippie America and its acolytes was so loud, and so constant, as to obfuscate anything but their wailing, amplified by the complicit mainstream media.
Seldom, if ever, in wartime has an Administration had to deal with such a traitorous segement of society, such a traitorous press and a such a traitorous Congress baying, "The President's a liar! There are no weapons! Waaaaaaah!"
Under the cold light of history, it may well be remembered that America's resolve in the 21st Century War on Terror was weakened to allow nothing more than a nostalgia trip for a bunch of long-in-the-tooth 20th Century hippies looking for one last "revolution" before they finally kicked the bucket.
As it was in the '60s and '70s, so it is today: These people are idiots, and if the pro-socialist press wasn't enabling them, they would have long ago been laughed out of existence.
Will the left call Israel liars?
Possible. They’re dumb enough..
We will see.
Yea, well lets see if one major publication or broadcast news source even bothers to mention this report when its released.
Not thinking the 'worst' of them, the issue could be they had constant surveillance of where they were and they didn't want to tip off whomever had them to panic and hide them. They may have made the decision that as long as they were able to track them, they were not a threat. This may be why that 20 tons of nerve gas was so quickly captured several years ago.. they never did say where that originated from.
I don’t believe it.
(I believe there were WMDs moved to Syria, always have, but I have a very hard time believing we’ll actually say it, and even if we do, the news will be silent and the Bush administration will let them.)
No way. The Dems told us that there were NO WMD in Iraq. Period. How could something that didn’t exist, be transferred by someone who wasn’t a threat to us? Nancy, Harry, Chris, Chuck, Dick, Obama, please explain?