Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phil_will1

Great video. If there’s a chance to get either one passed let’s move forward, preferrably with a consumption tax.


7 posted on 04/17/2008 7:28:21 PM PDT by groanup (Politics, dog ticks, wood ticks and bed ticks. They're all parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: groanup

You raise another point of departure that I have with the flat taxers. They claim that that the flat tax is more politically viable, since it is closer to what we already have. If that is the case, why do they not have a single bill with even 10 co-sponsors? And if that is the case, why is their only bill in the house a flat tax option? Also, how in the world do they expect the rest of the country to fall in behind them when the flat taxers themselves cannot even decide which proposal they support?

As Dick Armey said, the climb to get fundamental tax reform enacted is too steep and arduous that it does not make sense to go to that effort and get “the wrong answer”. I agree 100% with that sentiment; I just don’t agree with what would constitute “the right answer”.

The “inside the beltway” types don’t realize it yet, but the flat tax is dead as dead can be. That is the case whether the FairTax continues to grow or not.


8 posted on 04/18/2008 7:26:34 AM PDT by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson