Posted on 04/17/2008 4:07:06 PM PDT by Aristotelian
‘”Evolutionism”, is defined by the OED as “The theory of evolution, evolutionary assumptions or principles”. Creationists tend to use the term evolutionism in a misleading sense in order to suggest that evolution and creationism are equal in a philosophical debate.’
That's exactly how I'm using it. Evolutionism is a philosophical approach which evolutionists use to interpret data which, if not viewed through their philosophical lens, are not readily apparent as supportive of evolution and its allied assumptions.
What do you mean by “philosophical approach which evolutionists use to interpret data which, if not viewed through their philosophical lens, are not readily apparent as supportive of evolution and its allied assumptions.”
More credible than Ben Stein who claims that Richard Sternberg was fired from the Smithsonian Institution.
Ben Stein’s pile of propaganda would make Michael Moore blush.
” Evolution doesn’t cover the origin of life. That is another field of science “
LOL Pricless ! You don`t get to set the terms of the debate since logic demands that evolutionists prove how the first protein made itself which logically led to monkies becoming men.
Darwin has been proven wrong so many times it`s now become redundant, origin of baleen in whales being one.
Even Dawkins noted that scientific theories (neo darwinism) can rely on only so much “luck” before they cease to be credible.
Nice try junoir.
save
I am surprised you missed this piece in Scientific American where they debunk the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.
Try Again!
The theory of evolution doesn’t concern itself with the origin of life.
Pricless indeed. A lightning bolt manufactured the first protein from nothing ! ?Amino acid, snoogums. It helps to learn before you pontificate.Priceless.
Also, why isn't lightening still creating life? Has it lost it's 'spark'?Holy moly you're dumb.
LOL Pricless ! You don`t get to set the terms of the debate since logic demands that evolutionists prove how the first protein made itself which logically led to monkies becoming men.NO. You don't understand science at all do you? Go learn about empiricism and the scientific method and get back to me.
Secondary education would do you good snoogums.
You forgot to post the March 1974 issue of the mag that states we have entered a period of global cooling that will soon end the human race. If this is your bible than I see you only post when it favors your postion and you do not post its errors.
” Go learn about empiricism and the scientific method and get back to me.”
LOL! Can it get even more priceless ?
Darwin himself on OoS, “ Thank you heartily for what you say about my book; but you will be greatly disappointed; it will be grievously too hypothetical.”
LOL! Can it get even more priceless ?:rolleyes: NO U snoogums. Can you even state the central thesis of the origin of species and how it was developed? Fundamentally you're so woefully ignorant that you can't even understand *why* you're stupid.Darwin himself on OoS, “ Thank you heartily for what you say about my book; but you will be greatly disappointed; it will be grievously too hypothetical.”
I may actually go see this movie...I haven’t been to a movies since Forrest Gump. I just cannot support Hollywood with my hard earned money..I hate Hollywood and the Morons that make and ‘’star’’ in the movies
” Amino acid, snoogums. It helps to learn before you pontificate. “
LOL The priceless waif continues with it`s nothings.
AA`s come in 3D chains.MIT biochemists already tackled this.The odds remain.Calculated odds of finding a folded protein are about 1 in 10 to the 65 power.
NOW , when will the atheist/darwinists prove a single protein arose unaided.
You are at once, priceless yet worthless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.