Skip to comments.
Time magazine replaces flag in famous Iwo Jima photo with tree for global warming story [Barf Alert]
Daily Mail ^
| April 18 08
Posted on 04/18/2008 1:19:14 PM PDT by camerakid400
Furious World War II veterans called for a boycott of one of America's most influential and respected magazines today over a controversial picture on its front cover.
Next week's Time magazine cover is based on the famous shot by war photographer Joe Rosenthal of marines raising the US flag on Iwo Jima during the bloody battle in the Pacific.
But artists have replaced the flag with a tree to illustrate an article about global warming.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: agw; globalwarming; liberalmedia; timemag; veterans
To: camerakid400
They are completely clueless as to the meaning of that memorial. To them it’s just so much metal sticking out of the ground.
2
posted on
04/18/2008 1:21:34 PM PDT
by
ladtx
( "Never miss a good chance to shut up." - - Will Rogers)
To: camerakid400
Furious World War II veterans called for a boycott of one of America's most influential and respected magazines today over a controversial picture on its front cover.I thought this might be a serious story until I discovered it was from the Onion...
3
posted on
04/18/2008 1:21:50 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: camerakid400
But artists hack photo shoppers have replaced the flag with a tree to illustrate an article about global warming.
4
posted on
04/18/2008 1:23:06 PM PDT
by
chainsaw
( No black racist Muslims in the WH.)
To: mondoreb
Hopefully, there will be a lot of canceled Time subscriptions over this one. Folks who read Time probably agree with Time viewpoint.
5
posted on
04/18/2008 1:24:01 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Do we really want Huma answering the White House phone at 3 AM?)
To: camerakid400
a boycott of one of America's most influential and respected magazines today Influential? Respected? By whom? I doubt whether even many liberals subscribe to this useless rag any more.
I remember back in the 50s when I was in school and we were required to read it for one of our courses that I thought it was a bit simpleminded. But it was generally respected and influential. Since then, it's been all downhill. Vietnam and the Counterculture finished off all of those supposed "news magazines."
6
posted on
04/18/2008 1:24:16 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: camerakid400
How disgusting! Thank goodness I don’t buy or read that rag anyway!
7
posted on
04/18/2008 1:24:39 PM PDT
by
Cricket24
(ULTRA PATRIOT!!)
To: camerakid400
Time magazine is influential and respected? They may have been at one time, but both of those traits are a little eroded.
8
posted on
04/18/2008 1:24:41 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Living at large as a toxic curiosity since 1962)
To: Publius6961
I thought this might be a serious story until I discovered it was from the Onion... How did you find out? I can't find a reference to The Onion anywhere. I'm not doubting you, just want to know where to look next time!
9
posted on
04/18/2008 1:26:13 PM PDT
by
American Quilter
(Liberal--someone who's so open-minded that his brain fell out.)
To: ladtx
“They are completely clueless as to the meaning of that memorial. To them its just so much metal sticking out of the ground.”
“They are completely clueless as to the meaning of that memorial. To them its just so much metal sticking out of the ground.”
My World War II Marine uncle heard about this and just closed his eyes and shook his head. I would not want him to see the picture. He’s 84 and said he is glad he’s in the downside of the hill. He lost a hand on Saipan.
10
posted on
04/18/2008 1:26:40 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: camerakid400; 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten; 359Henrie; 6323cd; 75thOVI; abb; ACelt; Adrastus; A message; ...
I guess we've to be thankful that Time didn't include a Photoshopped Algore. /sarc
Milhist ping
To all: please ping me to threads that are relevant to the MilHist list (and/or) please add the keyword "MilHist" to the appropriate thread. Thanks in advance.
Please FREEPMAIL indcons if you want on or off the "Military History (MilHist)" ping list.
11
posted on
04/18/2008 1:28:31 PM PDT
by
indcons
To: indcons
It really is an insult to vets and Marines, especially to those who served in the Iwo Jima hellhole.
12
posted on
04/18/2008 1:33:25 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
To: camerakid400
Once upon a time it was like this:
Liberals read Newsweek.
Conservatives read U.S. News and World Report.
Idiots read Time.
13
posted on
04/18/2008 1:33:49 PM PDT
by
groanup
(Politics, dog ticks, wood ticks and bed ticks. They're all parasites.)
To: camerakid400
that’s pretty f____d up...
14
posted on
04/18/2008 1:34:11 PM PDT
by
nicko
(CW3 (ret.) CPT, you need to just unass the AO; I know what I'm doing- Major, you're on your own.)
To: Cicero
“Influential? Respected? By whom? I doubt whether even many liberals subscribe to this useless rag any more.”
I was born in Memphis in 1944.
In 1968, Time said this about Memphis:
“the decaying Mississippi river town of Memphis.”
I never again picked up a copy of Time, the tampon of leftist.
15
posted on
04/18/2008 1:36:37 PM PDT
by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
To: ladtx
The picture is a disgrace. Time should issue an immediate apology and then cease operations(because of this and because they suck anyway).
To: ASA Vet
Folks who read Time probably agree with Time viewpoint. Folks who read Time probably get their viewpoint from Time.........
17
posted on
04/18/2008 1:39:03 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: camerakid400
"How To Win The War On Global Warming"
1) Prove that current man-made CO2 emissions have any meaningful influence on the average global temperature.
2) After Step 1 has been completed, prove that the positive benefits to the world's population of significantly curbing CO2 emissions will outweigh the negative impact on the world's population, much of which is now finally moving out of poverty thanks to the power created by burning coal.
3) After Step 2 has been completed, attempt to convince every other nation in the world of the results of your analysis. Attempt to convince nations like China and India to hold back or end their current climbs out of poverty. Persuade the people of sub-Saharan Africa to stay in poverty by providing a library of complaints from complacent, fat Western liberals about how bad modern life in the West has gotten.
4) After Step 3 fails completely, I can see two possible alternatives for the US at this stage:
a) Embark on a crash program of nuclear power plant construction. Since most of these plants will not be built or provide power for decades due to environmentalist obstruction, convince the people of the US to get used to a lower standard of living for themselves and their children, replete with power outages and economic shrinkage throughout their lifetimes.
b) Build no nuclear power plants. Decommission existing coal-fired power plants. Await the inevitable riots and revolution.
To: colorado tanker
19
posted on
04/18/2008 1:44:03 PM PDT
by
indcons
To: camerakid400
I wonder if Time ever thought it ironic to put this cover on millions of magazines made from wood pulp?
Just how many trees died for this farce?
20
posted on
04/18/2008 1:55:32 PM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
I like the way you think.
21
posted on
04/18/2008 2:01:30 PM PDT
by
American Quilter
(Liberal--someone who's so open-minded that his brain fell out.)
To: camerakid400
The Metropolitan Museum of Old Stuff, 2039
Children, in the next display are what were called “magazines”. People paid to have them brought to their homes!
The one on the left was called `Time’, the other one on the left, `Newsweek’. Oh no, Jimmie—they’re long gone . . they stopped making them sometime the first part of the century.
22
posted on
04/18/2008 2:02:07 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(I try to avoid cliches like the plague)
To: ladtx
They ARE totally clueless and no doubt 'shocked' at the response. . .but this is just another glimpse as to their mindless, tasteless. . .vacuous and 'thankless' state of mind.
Like all Libs; these people; having NEVER entertained a 'patriotic' thought; would not recognize one, if it 'hit them upside the head'.
23
posted on
04/18/2008 2:08:44 PM PDT
by
cricket
(Damn Political Correctness; before it irretrievably, damns us all. . .)
To: camerakid400
The country is being brainwashed with the lunacy of “climate change.”
When will the madness stop?
24
posted on
04/18/2008 2:11:01 PM PDT
by
rightinthemiddle
(The Mainstream Media Controls Our Party. Go, RINOS!)
To: AlexW
Actually, to give my teachers credit, we were taught to read the New York Times and Time Magazine analytically. The point was in large part to get behind the news and to learn to detect when they seemed to be twisting it, or as we would later learn to say, spinning it.
(I was chosen senior year to write the weekly editorials for our school paper, but I apprenticed earlier at writing sports articles and composing headlines so they would fit the allotted space).
The NY Times was taken as a model of how to construct an article. At that time, they were relatively professional, and really did begin with Who, What, When, and Where, and they put the most important matters at the top, so the editors could cut it off at whatever length would fit.
Later, of course, they would develop the habit of putting less convenient facts, indeed centrally important facts, below the fold or in the continuation on the back page where casual readers were less likely to see them. But it was already noticeable back then, that even the Times, which was our practical and stylistic model, showed evident bias, when a schoolboy was taught how to look for it.
25
posted on
04/18/2008 2:16:45 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: camerakid400
This is as sickening and disgusting as the TV ads which equate the Normandy landings with global warming.
26
posted on
04/18/2008 2:18:26 PM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
To: American Quilter; Publius6961
I thought this might be a serious story until I discovered it was from the Onion... How did you find out? I can't find a reference to The Onion anywhere. I'm not doubting you, just want to know where to look next time!
Let me know if you find a link to the Onion.
Until then BTTT
To: Irish Eyes
It was a joke. A reference to Time as “one of America’s most influential and respected magazines today” is like the kind of material you find in the Onion, though this was not in the Onion itself.
28
posted on
04/18/2008 2:24:23 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: camerakid400; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Delacon; ..
To: camerakid400
No memory + no class = totally clueless
30
posted on
04/18/2008 4:14:48 PM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: camerakid400
... one of America's most influential and respected magazines ...
31
posted on
04/18/2008 4:24:14 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
To: camerakid400
If I had wasted my money on a “Time” subscription I would cancel it.
32
posted on
04/18/2008 4:52:33 PM PDT
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: Irish Eyes
33
posted on
04/18/2008 4:57:34 PM PDT
by
NathanR
(Obama: More 'African' than 'American'.)
To: ladtx
Those heroic Marines in that photo were fighting for freedom. The fraudulent enviromental movement is a front for the Watermelon (green outside, red inside) Marxists who would use this hoax to impose bureaucratic tyranny and depotism upon us.
34
posted on
04/18/2008 6:07:58 PM PDT
by
DMZFrank
To: indcons; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Too late, I’ve boycotted “Time” and “Newsweek” (and “US News” ever since it veered left) for years. Thanks indcons. This is reprehensible, but it’s just one of many such acts by the f-heads who run that POS.
35
posted on
04/18/2008 11:27:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
To: SunkenCiv
I don't even read them in the doctor's office anymore (but I do touch them, in order to turn them face-to-the wall and move them to the back of the rack).
Um, is that weird?
36
posted on
04/18/2008 11:36:59 PM PDT
by
Hunton Peck
(What would happen if the Ohio Players sang "Fire" in a crowded theater?)
To: camerakid400; SunkenCiv
This is how the cover really looks:
37
posted on
04/19/2008 8:25:36 AM PDT
by
Berosus
(Support our troops, bring them home -- from the Balkans.)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Great post. It sums up everything wrong with today’s environmentalist movement:
“a library of complaints from complacent, fat Western liberals about how bad modern life in the West has gotten”
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson