Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News Should Be Neither Fair Nor Balanced
Pajamas Media ^ | April 21, 2008 | Steve Boriss

Posted on 04/21/2008 3:16:54 PM PDT by moderatewolverine

When Fox News Channel was launched promising news that was “fair and balanced,” mainstream outlets were insulted by the insinuation that their news wasn’t.

They shouldn’t have been. In fact, “fair and balanced” news is a bad idea that was never in our past and will not be in our future.

Before the printing press was invented, news was spread by word-of-mouth, so everyone had the opportunity to influence the top stories. Even governments had to compete, sometimes by hiring singing, colorfully-garbed minstrels to break through the clutter. A pretty good system, really — a multitude of voices competing in a freewheeling marketplace of ideas, with individuals deciding for themselves whom to listen to and what to believe. But, fair and balanced? No.

Things did not improve with the invention of the printing press. The large size of printing presses made them difficult to conceal. This made it easy for governments to track down and pressure those who might be printing content that was critical of their actions. Thus began centuries of governments chilling free expression through a variety of legal mechanisms — e.g. issuance and revocation of licenses to publish, requiring approval prior to publication, censorship, and punishments as severe as the death penalty. A formula for fair and balanced news? Ha!

(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: american; bias; media; news
The way I describe it, it's not that Fox is "fair and balanced," but it provides balance to the overall media landscape.
1 posted on 04/21/2008 3:16:55 PM PDT by moderatewolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine

I balance my news out with scrappleface, weakly squirrel news, and The Onion.


2 posted on 04/21/2008 3:18:33 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I survived the same Bosnian gunfire as Hillary. It were'nt no thang.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine

This is a post and run because I have a meeting:

News should not be biased, it should not be balanced, it should be FAIR, ACCURATE, and COMPLETE, to the extent possible, not leaving out important facts.


3 posted on 04/21/2008 3:21:49 PM PDT by RatRipper (Call me a moral dinosaur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper
I do agree with you about "balanced'. That is the concession to PC. A stupid stupid move.

It should be the facts, and the presumption that the reader is not an idiot.

Wait.

...never mind...

4 posted on 04/21/2008 3:27:58 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine
"When Fox News Channel was launched promising news that was “fair and balanced,” mainstream outlets were insulted by the insinuation that their news wasn’t."

The truth hurts sometimes doesn't it scumbags? I don't think anyone would argue that Fox has a conservative slant but their slant is far less pronounced than the ultra liberal slant by the rest of the lamestream drive-by media and cable news networks.
5 posted on 04/21/2008 3:27:59 PM PDT by infantrywhooah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine
I agree. News has never been impartial and never will be, because it's written by human beings. Is there a human being who is able to purge every opinion and perspective from everything they write? Of course not. Even selecting what news stories to cover introduces bias because not everything can be covered. Thus, even if impartiality is attempted in good faith, which is not the case for most of the MSM, it's impossible.

It grates on me that the media presents itself as this impartial judge, fair and balanced, when it's so obviously biased almost uniformly to the left.

6 posted on 04/21/2008 3:28:03 PM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine

The news should not have to be “balanced” if it is true and accurate. Editorials should be labeled as such. The current media gets it all mixed up into short soundbites.


7 posted on 04/21/2008 3:32:02 PM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

Dare to dream. People should be able to get their news with whatever slant they want. Legislating “fairness” is Stalinism.


8 posted on 04/21/2008 3:37:37 PM PDT by orebuck07 (Ronald Reagan is not coming through that door, fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moderatewolverine

I just want ACCURATE without the commentary.


9 posted on 04/21/2008 3:51:36 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We have become an oligarchy not a Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

Just the facts Ma'am.

10 posted on 04/21/2008 5:40:58 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson