Posted on 04/22/2008 10:35:50 AM PDT by blam
Rising food prices 'a silent tsunami'
By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent
Last Updated: 1:12pm BST 22/04/2008
Rising food prices are a "silent tsunami" which threaten to be as devastating as the worst natural disasters, an international conference has been warned.
Josette Sheeran, of the World Food Programme told Gordon Brown and other political and business leaders that the international community needed to respond as effectively to the hunger crisis as it did to the 2004 tsunami which killed 250,000 and left 10 million destitute.
"This is the new face of hunger - the millions of people who were not in the urgent hunger category six months ago but now are," she added. "The response calls for large-scale, high-level action by the global community, focused on emergency and longer-term solutions.''
Her comments follow a call by the Prime Minister for an "agricultural revolution," to encourage poor farmers able to take advantage of technological solutions to grow high-yield crops.
Mr Brown admitted that British shoppers were already feeling the effects of the highest global food prices since the war, but warned the impacts on the world's poorest countries were catastrophic.
He added: "The World Health Organisation now views hunger as the number one threat to public health across the world, responsible for a third of child deaths and 10 per cent of all disease.
"Tackling hunger is a moral challenge to each of us and it is also a threat to the political and economic stability of nations. So I believe we need to see a fully co-ordinated response by the international community."
"I want to see an agricultural revolution that helps poor farmers in developing countries to grow more and we need to ensure more of the food they produce gets to market rather than being left to rot, as more than half is at present.
"A large 'aid for trade' package will be crucial to help poor farmers build storage facilities, better roads and develop the capacity to sell their products in our markets.''
Mr Brown has already written to G8 leaders calling for action on food prices. The aim of the summit is to develop a plan to take to the EU in June, the G8 in July and a special meeting of the United Nations in September.
Unveiling a £455 million food-aid package, Douglas Alexander, International Development Secretary, said: "We will work with key international institutions, such as the World Bank, IMF and United Nations, to develop a comprehensive approach that will help put food on the table for nearly a billion people going hungry across the world."
Meanwhile, the Trade Minister, Gareth Thomas, also warned that environmental campaigners may be fuelling poverty by persuading people to not buy food which has been flown in from Africa.
He added: "People shouldn't assume that buying food from abroad is worse for the environment than buying from the UK. It's not that simple.
"The livelihoods of a million African farmers are threatened by a misinformed food miles debate that might put shoppers off their produce - for example Dutch roses use more energy to produce than Kenyan roses."
Another threat to the third world, highlighted by My Brown, is the drive to convert farm land to produce biofuels could result in starvation for millions.
Until now, the Government had been a strong supporter of the use of biofuels grown from cereals such as maize as a means to reduce carbon emissions.
But in an article ahead of a Downing Street summit on global food prices, the Prime Minister said that hunger was now the world's number one threat to human health - and warned biofuels may be exacerbating the problem.
But the Prime Minister raised concerns that the use of farmland for energy crops may be adding to the global surge in food prices.
In this country, the price of some basic food items has risen by four times the rate of inflation, with cheese, eggs, butter, bread, milk and chicken all increasing by more than 10 per cent in the last year.
In his article for the Downing Street website, Mr Brown admitted the UK needed to be “more selective” in its support for biofuels, which it had previously championed as a means to tackle global warming.
Under the terms of the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation, all petrol and diesel must now contain a proportion of biofuel.
Mr Brown said the new fuels were "frequently energy inefficient," but added: "We need to look closely at the impact on food prices and the environment of different production methods and to ensure we are more selective in our support.
"If our UK review shows that we need to change our approach, we will also push for change in EU biofuels targets."
Phil Bloomer of Oxfam, who is attending the summit, welcomed Mr Brown's change of heart, saying:
"Setting mandatory targets for biofuels before we are aware of their full impact is madness.
"Not only are biofuels pushing up food prices, but they are also linked to human rights abuses and land-grabs from the poor."
Also attending the summit are representatives from the World Food Programme, the African Development Bank, Oxfam, Save the Children, the National Farmers Union and Sainsbury's.
This somehow is all Bush’s fault.
No, that wouldn't help assuage the leftists guilt sufficiently so better the world face mass starvation.
We need MORE BIO-FUELS!
“Let them eat ethanol.”
So, I have heard in the past that African farmers could not make enough money by farming because America would dump their extra products for free on Africa. Won’t the market correct this problem if it is allowed to? I mean if there are shortages and prices are up, wouldn’t it be worth it to farm in Africa?
We've been supporting you for a hundred years or so, and all you have done with the aid we have sent is empower five generations of warlords who starve you anyway and keep the best bits. Starting this year, we are going to be a little panicked over our housing market, and we think that the food we raise will probably more important to us than to giving it to you. Through our own short sightedness, we have given way too much money to the Arabs who are trying to conquer and enslave us, and to the Chinese who are busy polluting the planet into an early grave, so we suggest you trot right over to their countries and see if they might give a rat's backside about supporting you for the next hundred years. Let us know how that works out.
Yours, the United States
This is a good example why NOT to have globalization. It was through international coordination that this problem came about in the first place. The best policy remains a country must look out for its own needs FIRST.
If all this pricing issue were only bio-fuel related, then the argument of the idiots would make sense. But things are much more complex than the media has grasped.
Wheat...at least a month ago...was going for almost double what a farmer expected at a reasonable profit. Corn is at an all-time record through Canada and the entire US. My dad has said that every farmer in Alabama who has any significant land....is growing this year....and not taking the “bait-money” by the government to just sit on property and not produce. They are all signing pricing deals right now at a huge set scale and could see a twenty-five percent plus-up to the largest profit they ever saw in their life...if the weather holds. Some of these guys are even discussing a winter-type crop...which most never did before.
If folks examine the bio-fuels arguement....its strictly corn that they could use...but there just aren’t that many fuel plants in the US....especially the south. The Brazil guys have proven that the sugar beet is the best crop to use for bio-fuels and will corn will eventually be dumped in favor of the sugar beet.
I think an enormous amount of this entire mess...simply comes with the territory of China and India...having a population that is now eating well...which is what the UN wanted back ten years ago. There just aren’t starving folks in India today....and its basically the same story for the majority of Africa. If you want to eat well....then you need a bulk supply, and someone has to pay for it. If the Un would like to go back to a starving population concept....its basically too late now.
Maybe people should get back in the habit of planting their own little gardens.
Relax. Tuesday is Soylent Green day.
Shouldn’t that read, “tsilent tsunami”?
We are increasing the size of our garden 3x this spring to increase our canning and freezing stock substantially this year. Even our daughters, both married last year, are expressing an interest in helping to share in the work and the bounty, something they would never get caught doing when growing up under our roof.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.