Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hot Trend is cool yachts -- (global warming deniers)Part XXXIV
National Post ^ | September 08, 2007 | Lawrence Solomon

Posted on 04/23/2008 10:16:53 AM PDT by Delacon

To save the planet from global warming -- a looming catastrophe many believe we can no longer prevent -- could require that China stop building the equivalent of a new 1000 megawatt coal plant every five days, and India the same equivalent every two weeks. It could also require that the rest of the developing world slows its economic growth, for the good of humanity. And it could require us, in the rich countries, to dramatically curtail our air and auto travel, and other greenhouse gas producing activities, even if it means plunging ourselves into recession if not depression.

Or, stopping global warming could require sailing a fleet of 50 globe-cooling yachts on the high seas. To Stephen Salter, emeritus professor of engineering design at the University of Edinburgh and the inventor of the cool yachts, there is but one credible course to take, and informed scientists know it. Earlier this week at a climate debate sponsored by the Royal Meteorological Society, "I asked for a show of hands about whether official proposals for CO2 reductions could do enough to stop global warming in time," he explained. "Not one of 300 people with professional interest in the field raised a hand."

In contrast to the utter futility of attempting to quickly refashion the global economy into a carbon-lean machine, Prof. Salter's machine provides realistic hope. Low-level stratocumulus clouds blanket about one-quarter of the world's ocean surface, cooling the waters below by reflecting the sun's rays back into space. Brightening those clouds with sea salt to increase their reflectivity by a mere 3%, atmospheric scientists calculate, would provide sufficient additional cooling to counteract the warming effect caused by increased CO2 in the atmosphere. The sea salt would be delivered via fine sprays of ocean waters from Prof. Salter's yachts.

The amount of salt water required to cool the planet is surprisingly small -- 50 ships, each pumping salt water at the rate of 10 kilograms per second to produce tiny droplets, could suffice. The tiny droplets evaporate to leave salt residues, which are then distributed by the winds to seed the clouds. In an attempt to waste not a droplet, the yachts -- unmanned and controlled by satellite -- would continually roam the oceans, positioning themselves where cloud conditions were optimal and the need for cooling was greatest.

The scheme seems fanciful and implausible, but not to many scientists immersed in the climate change field. Eminent scientist John Latham at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, who first proposed cloud-seeding to cool the planet in a 1990 Nature article, is Prof. Salter's enthusiastic collaborator in the venture. Scientists at NASA, Brookhaven, the U.K.'s Royal Meteorological Society and other prominent agencies likewise see promise in the cloud-seeding concept. It is Prof. Salter's own track record, however, that dispels any notion that the cool yachts are more fantasy than fantastic.

Many of the modern power-producing windmills now in operation throughout Europe are based on Prof. Salter's designs, as is a major tidal generator now being built off the coast of the United Kingdom. Among his many other pre-sciences, in 1968 he invented the touch computer screen. The wind-powered yacht with its odd rotor sails is not his, however, and is also not new. This 1920s invention, by Germany's Anton Flettner, was an unusually stable commercial ship that crossed the Atlantic, out-sailing normal schooners under moderate to heavy winds.

Prof. Salter's cool yachts do have one major design flaw: They promise to save the planet for a pittance, and without making humans pay a dear price for their profligate ways. Fifty ships a year, built at a cost of some $400-million to $500-million, would remove the increased warming now attributed to all the fossil fuel burning. They would also provide the time required for an orderly transition to economies based on renewable fuels -- the passion of Prof. Salter's professional life.

For reasons that would be unfathomable to many, environmentalists at Greenpeace and elsewhere have emerged as critics of the cool yachts, dismissing them out of hand as wacky inventions "that in all likelihood would come to nothing" and saying: "We're looking for reductions in the use of fossil fuels rather than these technologies."

A more important critic, because it holds the purse strings, is the U.K. Environment Ministry, responsible for abating global warming. It has been doing its best to trim Prof. Salter's sails. The technology that Prof. Salter proposes is not yet soundly proven, it says, refusing to provide the $5-million in funds required to soundly prove it. The technology could lead to increased rainfall over the oceans, it says, without saying why this poses a problem comparable to that of global warming. The EU has committed to carbon trading as a means of countering global warming, it says, without acknowledging that carbon trading has failed to slow the increase in carbon dioxide. Marine animals could be affected by the technology, it says, as if the consequences of global warming would not affect them. An environmental assessment of the effects of spraying salt water into the air is required, it says, while dismissing Prof. Salter's detailed proposal for conducting one.

The public might not like the yachts, the Environment Ministry also says, when it really fears that the public might like them too much. - Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe and the Urban Renaissance Institute.

CV OF A DENIER

Prof. Stephen Salter, emeritus professor of engineering design at the School of Engineering and Electronics at the University of Edinburgh, is "one of the finest engineers that Scotland has produced," according to Alex Salmond, Scotland's First Minister. Prof. Salter is an authority on energy matters in general and renewable energy in particular. He is best known for his pioneering work to harness wave energy, which he begun in the 1970s in response to the OPEC oil crisis. His invention, Salter's Duck, is the machine against which all others are measured. In small-scale controlled tests, the Duck can stop 90% of wave motion and can convert 90% of that to electricity. Cambridge-trained, Prof. Salter is a fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the inventor of numerous technologies, and the author or co-author of numerous papers.

LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alarmists; climate; climatechange; globalwarming; skeptics
Back on 3/24 I rediscovered(hat tip Freeper Libwhacker)  a very overlooked series of articles written by Lawrence Solomon of the National Post that sought to show how there was no "consensus" on global warming. Mr. Solomon didn't have to dig up illuminati believing bloggers, corporate shills or political pundits to do it. He just found some of the most respected scientists in their respective fields of study. At the time, I could find 27 articles in the series. I since found there are 38 so far.  I will be posting the remaining 11 articles over the next few days. Mr. Solomon has just written a book based on the series called The Deniers: The World-Renowned Scientists Who Stood Up Against Global Warming Hysteria, Political Persecution, and Fraud**and those who are too fearful to do so. Freepmail me with a request to join my "the deniers"/global warming ping list if you'd like. Here is the series:

The Post's series on scientists who buck the conventional wisdom on climate science. Here is the series so far:

Statistics needed -- The Deniers Part I
Warming is real -- and has benefits -- The Deniers Part II
The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science -- The Deniers Part III
Polar scientists on thin ice -- The Deniers Part IV
The original denier: into the cold -- The Deniers Part V
The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI
Will the sun cool us? -- The Deniers Part VII
The limits of predictability -- The Deniers Part VIII
Look to Mars for the truth on global warming -- The Deniers Part IX
Limited role for C02 -- the Deniers Part X


End the chill -- The Deniers Part XI

Clouded research -- The Deniers Part XII
Allegre's second thoughts -- The Deniers XIII
The heat's in the sun -- The Deniers XIV
Unsettled Science -- The Deniers XV
Bitten by the IPCC -- The Deniers XVI
Little ice age is still within us -- The Deniers XVII
Fighting climate 'fluff' -- The Deniers XVIII
 
Science, not politics -- The Deniers XIX
Gore's guru disagreed -- The Deniers XX

The ice-core man -- The Deniers XXI

Some restraint in Rome -- The Deniers XXII
Discounting logic -- The Deniers XXIII
Dire forecasts aren't new -- The Deniers XXIV
They call this a consensus? -- Part XXV
NASA chief Michael Griffin silenced - Part XXVI
Forget warming - beware the new ice age -- Part XXVII
Open mind sees climate clearly -- Part XXVIII
Models trump measurements -- Part XXIX
What global warming, Australian skeptic asks -- Part XXX

In the eye of the storm of global warming -- Part XXXI
From chaos, coherence -- Part XXXII
The aerosol man -- Part XXXIII
The Hot Trend is cool yachts -- Part XXXIV
You still need your parka in Antarctica -- Part XXXV

IPCC too blinkered and corrupt to save -- Part XXXVI
Why melting of ice sheets 'is impossible' -- Part XXXVII
Climate change by Jupiter -- Part XXXVIII

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/pages/climate-change-the-deniers.aspx


1 posted on 04/23/2008 10:16:54 AM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; ...

IMO not Mr. Solomon’s strongest article. It seems to concede that there is global warming. But what the heck. Its part of the series and it shows how if climate change (be it cooling or warming)does become a real problem, its human ingenuity that will solve the problem and not government intervention.


2 posted on 04/23/2008 10:19:51 AM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Isn’t there a danger of starting another ice age by doing this, since we have no idea how any of this really works?


3 posted on 04/23/2008 10:20:40 AM PDT by ducdriver ("Impartiality is a pompous name for indifference, which is an elegant name for ignorance." GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Salter doesn’t come over as an AGW skeptic, at least not from the article. He comes across as someone with a plan to cool the planet down - about the worst thing possible would be if his plan succeeded.


4 posted on 04/23/2008 10:22:11 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

This is just great, an ocean-going sprinkler system to help ‘cool’ the planet. I wonder what the possibilities are that it may have unintended consequences?


5 posted on 04/23/2008 10:27:15 AM PDT by whipitgood (Neither of, by, nor for the people any longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Oh God - PLEASE let them do this crap. Then, in ten years, we can read the cover stories on Time and Newsweek about how “Salinated Seawater: Is it Destroying Our Forests?”

The humor cycle never ends with these eviro-whackos.


6 posted on 04/23/2008 10:29:18 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Whoops, meant to write: “Salinated Rainwater: Is it Destroying Our Forests?”


7 posted on 04/23/2008 10:29:55 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

“Salinated Seawater” is way funnier :0)

You can imagine the headlines in 2025: “Is the sea too salty? Geo-Pope Gorannicus II says we have only ten years to save the planet!”


8 posted on 04/23/2008 10:35:38 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Why do they need 50 ships? heck.. about 10 old-school fire boats(the kind they use to put out fires on ships) could do this. 10kg water per second is a little less than 10 liters of saltwater per second. I’m betting a fireboat puts out considerably more than this from EACH of the turret nozzles. This could probably be done fairly cheaply just as a test.

Boy, would that PO the whackos.


9 posted on 04/23/2008 11:10:30 AM PDT by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
You could call them cogitator yachts...

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Ethanol Kills Wildlife

Government to release proposed fuel economy rules

Americans for Prosperity Launches Nationwide Hot Air Balloon Tour to Expose Economic Costs of Climate Change Legislation

Irrational Green Exuberance

Journalist notes liberal bias in global warming reports

BIO-FOOLISHNESS

Earth Daze, Courtesy Of Al Gore

Gorging Gore “addicted” to steak

Cardinal Pell disputes global warming hypothesis

Starving The Poor By Pandering To Big Ag

Politically Correct Conventional Wisdom

CO2 Science, Vol. 11, No. 17

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

10 posted on 04/23/2008 11:51:57 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Carbon sequestration makes a lot more sense.

Top Scientist Calls For Radical Technology To Extract Carbon Dioxide From The Air

11 posted on 04/23/2008 1:35:44 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
You better make sure the CO2 is sequestered in seismically inactive areas. If an earthquake ruptures the place where you put the CO2, you could end up with thousands of people being smothered to death as the gas belches out of the ground.
12 posted on 04/23/2008 4:43:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
From the article:
“The scheme seems fanciful and implausible”

-that quote could be applied to your “Carbon sequestration” scheme, as well.

-Ya know, Cog, you've been trumpeting the runaway greenhouse effect, and steadily rising temperatures since that theory first became popular. -and yet this last year, both sat and surface temps are down, by .595 degree Celsius, in spite of rising Anthropogenic CO2 emissions (which is a mere trace gas)

It seems like common sense would kick in at some point, for you.

-Then again, there seems to be an odd disconnect with common sense with global warming alarmists, and their acceptance of bizarre solutions prove that.

13 posted on 04/25/2008 3:28:52 AM PDT by FBD (My carbon footprint is bigger then yours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FBD
Ya know, Cog, you've been trumpeting the runaway greenhouse effect,

I have never trumpeted the "runaway greenhouse effect". Be specific. I think that there is substantial, credible scientific evidence -- a wide variety of it -- that indicates anthropogenic global warming is occurring.

and yet this last year, both sat and surface temps are down, by .595 degree Celsius, in spite of rising Anthropogenic CO2 emissions

Again, be specific. Does last year mean 2007? Here is the NOAA global land-ocean surface temperature plot generated at the end of 2007:


For 2007, the global land and ocean surface temperature was the fifth warmest on record. Separately, the global land surface temperature was warmest on record while the global ocean temperature was 9th warmest since records began in 1880. Some of the largest and most widespread warm anomalies occurred from eastern Europe to central Asia.

Note in particular the "dip" in temperatures corresponding to the 1999-2000 La Nina, right after the 1998 peak (which on this plot looks lower than 2005; and I know NOAA still ranked 1998 ahead of 2005. Hmmm....) Anyway, wouldn't you have asked me in 2000 about those falling temperatures? Wouldn't that have been a bit premature?

Now, this winter has been cold -- in places, and the global land-surface index is down due to La Nina and the possibly related Asian cold wave in January. Again, I think it's a bit premature to call this a significant decadal trend.

As for carbon sequestration, look up Wally Broecker's resume and see if you thinks he's a crackpot proposing a bizarre solution.

I'll help:

Wallace S. Broecker

Columbia Scientist Wally Broecker Awarded 2006 Crafoord Prize in Geosciences

His Web bio page at Columbia University is very meagre.

14 posted on 04/25/2008 10:18:33 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson