Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vanders9
Ok - Martin Luthor King didnt have the numbers on his side, and he didnt need guns either.

He had liberals and the media on his side. Those groups are far more dangerous than conservatives with guns.

Plus, MLK really didn't "win" much. He must be spinning in his grave at what became of his "civil rights" movement. The black family has been destroyed, and young black men die way too young these days.

46 posted on 04/24/2008 12:43:13 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81

“He had liberals and the media on his side.”

I would hope, being in the right, that he had more than that on his side.

“Those groups are far more dangerous than conservatives with guns.”

You said it!

“Plus, MLK really didn’t “win” much. He must be spinning in his grave at what became of his “civil rights” movement. The black family has been destroyed, and young black men die way too young these days.”

He must be, but that’s hardly his fault. He certainly never purposed that. Those who followed after him were men of lesser vision.

He


48 posted on 04/25/2008 12:32:52 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson