Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Reestablishes U.S. Fourth Fleet
navy.mil ^ | 4/24/08 | Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Alan Gragg

Posted on 04/25/2008 4:06:13 AM PDT by Typical_Whitey

MAYPORT, Fla. (NNS) -- Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Gary Roughead announced today the reestablishment of U.S. 4th Fleet and assigned Rear Adm. Joseph D. Kernan, currently serving as Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command, as its first commander.

U.S. 4th Fleet will be responsible for U.S. Navy ships, aircraft and submarines operating in the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) area of focus, which encompasses the Caribbean, and Central and South America and the surrounding waters.

Located in Mayport, Fla., and dual-hatted with Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command (COMUSNAVSO), U.S. 4th Fleet reestablishment addresses the increased role of maritime forces in the SOUTHCOM area of focus, and demonstrates U.S. commitment to regional partners.

"Reconstituting the Fourth Fleet recognizes the immense importance of maritime security in the southern part of the Western Hemisphere, and sends a strong signal to all the civil and military maritime services in Central and Latin America," said Roughead. "Aligning the Fourth Fleet along with our other numbered fleets and providing the capabilities and personnel are a logical execution of our new Maritime Strategy."

U.S. 4th Fleet was original established in 1943 as one of the original numbered fleets, and was given a specific mission. During World War II, the U.S. needed a command in charge of protecting against raiders, blockade runners and enemy submarines in the South Atlantic. U.S. 4th Fleet was disestablished in 1950 when U.S. 2nd Fleet took over its responsibilities.

Initially, the new 4th Fleet will be headquartered with COMUSNAVSO and take advantage of the existing infrastructure, communications support and personnel already in place in Mayport. As a result, U.S. 4th Fleet will not involve an increase in forces assigned in Mayport.

"This is a significant change and presents us the opportunity to garner the right resources for the missions we run for Southern Command," said Rear Adm. James W. Stevenson Jr., Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command (NAVSO). "As a numbered fleet, we will be in a better position to ensure the Combatant Commander has the right assets available when needed."

U.S. 4th Fleet will retain responsibility as COMUSNAVSO, the Navy component command for SOUTHCOM. Its mission is to direct U.S. naval forces operating in the Caribbean, Central and South American regions and interact with partner nation navies within the maritime environment. Various operations include counter-illicit trafficking, Theater Security Cooperation, military-to-military interaction and bilateral and multinational training.

For more information from Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command visit www.cusns.navy.mil.

For more information from U.S. Southern Command visit www.southcom.mil.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 4thfleet; navair; navy; southcom; usnavy
Excellent move. Peace through strength ping. Nancy Pelosi and the Libs must be beside themselves since they defend their boy Chavez so eagerly...
1 posted on 04/25/2008 4:06:13 AM PDT by Typical_Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

2 posted on 04/25/2008 4:11:34 AM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey
Teddy would be proud.

Roosevelt corollary

In 1904, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt added the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, which asserted the right of the United States to intervene in Latin America. This was the most significant amendment to the original doctrine and was widely opposed by critics, who argued that the Monroe Doctrine was originally meant to stop European influence in the Western Hemisphere while the Corollary much more directly asserted U.S. hegemony in that area, essentially making them a "hemispheric policeman."
3 posted on 04/25/2008 4:17:40 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Hey, Hugo! How’s it going?


4 posted on 04/25/2008 4:21:20 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey
Ah. Found it:

All that this country desires is to see the neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States. Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power.

Hear the sabers rattling, Hugo?
5 posted on 04/25/2008 4:26:38 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

I wonder how this affects Commander, U.S. Forces Carribean, located in Key West? He had command responsibility for all U.S. Forces on land or sea in the Gulf, Carribean, coastal waters and Central America back in the mid ‘80’s.

I supported that Joint Command in ‘86 - ‘87.


6 posted on 04/25/2008 4:28:12 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Curious as to whether this move is really in anticipation of the Dems actions as described in this article at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006473/posts


7 posted on 04/25/2008 4:28:22 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Hey, Hugo! How’s it going?

LOL~ "Candy-Gram for Mr. Chavez!"

8 posted on 04/25/2008 4:55:08 AM PDT by paulcissa (The first requirement of Liberalism is to stand on your head and tell the world they're upside down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Excellent indeed. There’s recently been huge oil discoveries in Brazil and the Falkland Islands..

All your oil belongs to us ;)


9 posted on 04/25/2008 5:01:35 AM PDT by revtown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Good! The first order of business should be conducting regular carrier cyclic ops and CQ off the coast of Venezuela...


10 posted on 04/25/2008 5:05:14 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

The Navy is seriously considering stationing the USS George H.W. Bush (under construction) at Mayport. If this carrier were assigned to the new Fourth Fleet...


11 posted on 04/25/2008 5:12:09 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Interesting. Think this is aimed at Chavez?


12 posted on 04/25/2008 5:19:35 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Yes, but did they give them any assets?


13 posted on 04/25/2008 5:21:57 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
Kernan is the first SEAL to command a numbered fleet.

He commanded Platoons at Underwater Demolition Team 12, SEAL
Delivery Vehicle Team 1, and SEAL Team 5. Additionally while
assigned to SEAL Team 5, he served as Detachment Officer-in-Charge
of four deployed SEAL platoons and Deputy Commander, Naval Special Warfare Task Force, Middle East Force.

Impressive guy !!

14 posted on 04/25/2008 5:30:31 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

BTTT


15 posted on 04/25/2008 5:31:04 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
If this carrier were assigned to the new Fourth Fleet...

It might be the fact that my caffeine levels haven't reached optimum, yet, but I'm not following you here. Why would assigning CVN 77 to Fourth Fleet be special? I'd assumed they would get a CVN anyway.

16 posted on 04/25/2008 5:31:18 AM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
I wonder how this affects Commander, U.S. Forces Carribean, located in Key West? He had command responsibility for all U.S. Forces on land or sea in the Gulf, Carribean, coastal waters and Central America back in the mid ‘80’s.

It got rolled up under Centcom in the 90's.

17 posted on 04/25/2008 5:48:43 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
The Navy is seriously considering stationing the USS George H.W. Bush (under construction) at Mayport. If this carrier were assigned to the new Fourth Fleet...

Carriers won't be permanently assigned to the 4th Fleet, just like they aren't permanently assigned to the 6th or 5th Fleets. They'll be detached from the 2nd Fleet and deployed to the 4th as necessary.

18 posted on 04/25/2008 5:51:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: magslinger
I'd assumed they would get a CVN anyway.

Jacksonville lost the Saratoga and JFK and is currently not equipped to support nuclear. The Navy pulled out of Cecil Field in favor of Oceania and then, after thousands of homes were built in the area, and businesses were lured into an economic zone, proposed re-opening the field, which was shot down by the voters.

But this is a navy town and is one of the few places in Florida that will not have difficulty supporting nukes.

19 posted on 04/25/2008 6:18:56 AM PDT by Dutchgirl ("All you need to know about Obama is this: Farrakhan really wants him to be president."-Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
Jacksonville lost the Saratoga and JFK and is currently not equipped to support nuclear.

Other than dredging the channel and the harbor for the larger ship and deeper draft I'm not aware of anything else they'd have to do. Nuclear carriers require no different support that I'm aware of than conventional ones do. Other than not needing refueling.

20 posted on 04/25/2008 6:23:51 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
There was some public protest here about 20 years ago when supporting nuclear was first proposed. I think that the military would need to go through a permitting process, maybe even a public referendum, but with the success of the Kingsland facility, it should be a slam dunk.

There was a recent referendum passed to permit dredging for larger ships coming into Jaxport and Blount Island, and I believe that encompasses Mayport since it's at the mouth of the river.

21 posted on 04/25/2008 6:33:48 AM PDT by Dutchgirl ("All you need to know about Obama is this: Farrakhan really wants him to be president."-Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Hey Hugo! Say Hello to my Li’l friend.


22 posted on 04/25/2008 6:40:12 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robe
“Kernan is the first SEAL to command a numbered fleet.”

I'm sure he can do the job but it's an interesting selection, none the less.

It says a lot about the importance the Navy is putting on special operations skills.

23 posted on 04/25/2008 7:18:47 AM PDT by ryan71 (Typical bitter white gun toter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robe; BIGLOOK

MAYPORT, Fla. (NNS) — Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Adm. Gary Roughead announced today the reestablishment of U.S. 4th Fleet and assigned Rear Adm. Joseph D. Kernan, currently serving as Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command, as its first commander.

“U.S. 4th Fleet will be responsible for U.S. Navy ships, aircraft and submarines operating in the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) area of focus, which encompasses the Caribbean, and Central and South America and the surrounding waters.”

Kernan is the first SEAL to command a numbered fleet.
He commanded Platoons at Underwater Demolition Team 12, SEAL
Delivery Vehicle Team 1, and SEAL Team 5. Additionally while
assigned to SEAL Team 5, he served as Detachment Officer-in-Charge
of four deployed SEAL platoons and Deputy Commander, Naval Special Warfare Task Force, Middle East Force.

Impressive guy !!


Makes one wonder what was on the computers of Chavez’s butt boy who got a dirt bath earlier this year, courtesy of Columbia?

This makes one hell of an impressive combo with a Great Seal in command of this mobile fire power and a real understanding of how to use and how not to use Spec Ops.

Candy Gram time for Chavez?


24 posted on 04/25/2008 7:21:51 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Hussein ObamaSamma's Pastor, Jeremiah Wright: "God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

Key West? I was in Key West. Give me a break. That’s the party base. What do they have? 3 or 4 slips? As least when I was there in the 70s.

Mayport is the place you wanna be. Key West is way too small and close enough to Cuba to wave hello to Raul. The waters are incredibly shallow with limited maneuvering for bigger ships. That is no place to be based for anything other than local patrols. If any place was a case study for a littoral navy, that’s it.


25 posted on 04/25/2008 8:26:20 AM PDT by bioqubit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: magslinger; Non-Sequitur

Non-Sequitur points out that any carrier in the Atlantic would be assigned to the 2nd Fleet and loaned to the 4th Fleet as needed.

My thought is that assigning the USS Bush to the 4th Fleet and basing it in Mayport (and loaning it elsewhere as needed) would demonstrate that the 4th Fleet is meant to be a serious and permanent projection of power in an increasingly troubled area on our doorstep and not simply a reorganization of top brass.


26 posted on 04/25/2008 8:37:00 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl; Non-Sequitur

The Virginia politicians managed to get the jets assigned to NAS Cecil Field moved to NAS Oceana in the BRAC round of the early 90’s. When Cecil closed, the property was turned over to the City of Jacksonville and, not anticipating the possibility of the jets returning, began developing civilian industries. Restrictions on development in the area were also removed, and Oak Leaf Plantation, among others, sprang up.

The most recent BRAC round looked at moving the jets back because of the encroached development at Oceana hindered operations and training. Unfortunately, by then Cecil Commerce Center and surrounding development made that move infeasible. As much as Jacksonville would have liked to have them back, it was really too late in the game to move the to Cecil. The Navy still uses OLF Whitehouse to practice carrier landings, and the city does actively restrict development around it.

I am not aware of any major public protests over making Mayport “nuclear capable” 20 years ago. If there were such protests, they would have been carried out by a few malcontents only and not have been a reflection of the city’s mood.

When the USS Saratoga was decommisioned, the Navy brought in the USS Kennedy. That has since been decommisioned (the USS Kitty Hawk, stationed in Japan, is now the only non-nuclear carrier in the fleet). The Navy completed an EIS for upgrading Mayport to handle nuclear carriers (this work involves dredging and building nuclear maintenence facilities). All local politicans are highly enthusiastic for this and I am not aware of any local opposition.


27 posted on 04/25/2008 8:51:22 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Carriers won't be permanently assigned to the 4th Fleet, just like they aren't permanently assigned to the 6th or 5th Fleets. They'll be detached from the 2nd Fleet and deployed to the 4th as necessary.

I agree. Carriers do post yard work ups down there anyway plus pre-deployment training. There usually one underway in the area I'd guess most of the time. Typical time down off GITMO alone used to be 30-45 days straight. They could and should open Rosie Roads NAS back up though for support and a staging area.

28 posted on 04/25/2008 8:59:48 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Three Blind Rats. Three Blind Rats, See How They Run. See How They Run. Hillbomacain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

So this is why those 2 Essex class carriers and 3 dozen coal fired four-stackers were pulled out of mouthballs last month.


29 posted on 04/25/2008 9:00:51 AM PDT by fella (Is he al-taquiya or is he murtadd? Only his iman knows for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Bingo.


30 posted on 04/25/2008 9:09:27 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
To accommodate a nuclear carrier, the Navy would have to dredge a channel about 10 feet deeper and build three major maintenance facilities, according to the report.

The Navy estimates it would cost $50 million to dredge 5.7 million cubic yards of sediment and up to $370 million to build the shore and pier infrastructure.

Future of Mayport Naval Station remains uncertain

31 posted on 04/25/2008 9:14:30 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
No matter the cost we need more than one operational carrier base on the east coast. Pier 10 I think it is called in NORVA has issues such as lacking wind shear protection that the old pier 12 offered due to location. Hampton Roads storms can be quite mean and quite sudden. Pier 12 held us tight while other ships broke away.

We don't need every undeployed carrier sitting in NORVA. Mayport used to be one of our liberty ports. KENNEDY was homeported there in the 1970's IIRC and in 1980 we got orders for a homeport change to Mayport that I think Cap Weinberger later rescinded. Not sure about that I was off ship by then.

32 posted on 04/25/2008 9:25:57 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Three Blind Rats. Three Blind Rats, See How They Run. See How They Run. Hillbomacain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

OK, makes sense to me. Coming out of the blue as it were and my low caffeine state it didn’t click.


33 posted on 04/25/2008 11:11:43 AM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Especially with that name. Steaming around spewing sulfur fumes. I know it’s the wrong Bush, but would Hugo?


34 posted on 04/25/2008 11:14:37 AM PDT by magslinger (cranky right-winger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Nuclear carriers require no different support that I'm aware of than conventional ones do. Other than not needing refueling.

This is a little bit of a misnomer. CVN's are still very much a part of the logistics chain as they regularly take on fuel for their CAGs - and that fuel is sometimes used to refuel the carrier escorts during exercises (meaning I don't think they've ever had to do this as part of an actual deployment).

A carrier that didn't regularly replenish her fuel stores would shortly become a glorified aircraft transport.

35 posted on 04/25/2008 12:36:27 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Charlton Heston & Ronald Reagan - my two favorite Presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
This is a little bit of a misnomer. CVN's are still very much a part of the logistics chain as they regularly take on fuel for their CAGs - and that fuel is sometimes used to refuel the carrier escorts during exercises.

And since Mayport has hosted carriers for decades, an infrastruction for loading aviation fuel will already be in place. The requirements for loading it on nuclear carriers will not be any different than loading it on a conventional one.

36 posted on 04/25/2008 12:43:47 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

A “Fleet” Commanded by a Rear Admiral?

He’s obviously a warrior of note, but until they let me know what assets he’s going to have available, this is pretty much a paper move.

Most CTGs were run by RADMs if I recall. A Fleet was a Vice Admiral slot.


37 posted on 04/25/2008 1:32:35 PM PDT by Ronin (Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey
Hey I'm a Navy Dad, with a question for one of you knowledgeable Navy guys. My Son has served in Key West, Mayport and at Present at the US Embassy in London. He is about to be reassigned and has a dream sheet for two billets in San Diego and one in Tampa. What are the chances he could go to SD? I heard some where that once have most of your assignments is say the Atlantic that you would be inclined to stay on the East Coast. Is there any truth to that?
38 posted on 04/25/2008 1:47:02 PM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (My tag line is broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Oh, Hugooooooooooooooooooooo


39 posted on 04/25/2008 4:45:24 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

And yet we don’t have the money for the aircraft that we need on carriers... but we can still at another level of bureaucracy.


40 posted on 04/25/2008 6:13:00 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bioqubit
Key West was home to SUBRON 12, a diesel-electric training squadron and the USS Bushnell, a submarine tender. The NAVSTA Annex had one pier, only big enough for a couple of Destroyer Escort sized ships. NAS was home to VS-30 and HS-1, training squadrons that worked with SUBRON 12. VF-101 was also a training squadron. VX-1 was test and evaluation.
Other than the Hotpad detachment there wasn't single combat ready outfit in the area.

Once it was clear that no more diesel boats would be built most of the commands moved out. NAS stays open now to in most part, to train fighter pilots

41 posted on 04/25/2008 7:05:39 PM PDT by oyez (Justa' another high minded lowlife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
A Fleet was a Vice Admiral slot.

It's an promotion slot. He's VAdm now.
42 posted on 04/25/2008 7:34:09 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (MSM-Keelhauling the News Daily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

Depends on the number of dependents that he has. If married and kids its harder to get a coast change due to the cost of House Hold Goods moves. In the past there was also the option of taking a 1 year unaccompanied tour in Diego Garcia that would make him part of the West Coast and from there follow on orders to San Diego for him and dependents. OTOH if he is single coast changes should not be too much of a problem depending on his rate and the billet availability i.e., if there is an open slot in San Diego and he is single he should talk to his chief and have his chief call the detailer on his behalf ...

Hope this helped.


43 posted on 04/25/2008 9:07:28 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Prepare to do your time as Corvee labor on the Plantation of Barack and Michell Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Robe; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; Ernest_at_the_Beach; nuconvert; Travis McGee

Friday I posted this comment re the recovered laptop:

“Makes one wonder what was on the computers of Chavez’s butt boy who got a dirt bath earlier this year, courtesy of Columbia?”

Now we have this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2007601/posts

Official: Laptop reveals ties to Ecuador (FARC)
Miami Herald ^ | Apr. 27, 2008

Posted on Sunday, April 27, 2008 6:08:49 AM by nuconvert

Official: Laptop reveals ties to Ecuador

By ALEJANDRA LABANCA

New documents a Colombian government official says were retrieved from the computer of slain guerrilla leader Raúl Reyes show FARC’s ties in Latin America may be more widespread than previously reported. Some of the documents, obtained by The Miami Herald, indicate that a leading member of Ecuador’s constitutional assembly, charged with reshaping that country’s political landscape, may have been a longtime supporter of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

María Augusta Calle — also the head of Venezuela’s Telesur TV network in Ecuador and a supporter of President Hugo Chávez — let the rebels use her bank account for at least one transaction and helped promote their ideas through another news agency she directs, the Colombian offical said.

In two e-mails dated June and July 2006, a woman who signs as ‘’Alicia’’ corresponds with someone she calls ‘’friend’’ in one of her e-mails and ‘’Darío’’ in the other. She talks about personal matters, current affairs and media strategies.


44 posted on 04/27/2008 6:37:09 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Hussein ObamaSamma's Pastor, Jeremiah Wright: "God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl

I agree. (I live in Orange Park and get to NAS JAX weekly.)


45 posted on 04/27/2008 12:44:49 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson