Posted on 04/28/2008 3:55:37 PM PDT by SmithL
The same people who show up at the welfare office and say "Gimme money".
But, it will definitely stop real voter fraud. But, then, why try to do some real good when a possibility of harm, however, remote exists.
Shakespeare said it best: "First let's kill all the lawyers."
6-3 is NOT “splintered.”
The Rats continued attempts to allow illegals and dead people to vote is what undermines our freedoms and liberty.
Its about time the SCOTUS put the hammer to this stuff.
Then how on earth can they go down and vote in the first place???????????
And I bet they have to have identification when they do!
And since there is no constitutional right to vote, I saw screw em.
Why don’t the dims just set up a program to get legal voters ID? They drive them to the polls, why not drive them to get ID?
The answer of course is that dead people won’t be able to vote and living democrats won’t be able to vote for someone else or twice.
Gosh, maybe because the Voter ID program is working the way its supposed to?
Thank God that Bush won the 2004 election.
Because, John Kerry would have appointed two liberal judges to the Supreme Court. Instead of Roberts and Alito, we would have seen two more liberals appointed. Instead of a 6-3 decision upholding the law, it would have been 5-4 striking it down.
People have their issues with Bush, but conservatives have to be happy about his 2 picks to the Supreme Court.
The next president may have 2 or 3 vacancies to fill on the Court. Some justices are getting older and could retire in the next four years.
This is all about desperation cause the illegals, the death, multiple voters, prisoners, and the like will not be able to vote but once!... and they must "alive." :)
If there is ONE THING a country like the U.S. should strive for is the INTEGRITY OF THE VOTE...especially for the losers... they should know they lost fair and square.
The same people who show up at the welfare office and say “Gimme money”.
And I bet they have to have identification when they do!
The only I.D. these parasites need to collect welfare is a gas bill or rent receipt with their Name on it.
yeah, “splintered”...
It’s about time ID was required to vote. Stop a lot of fraud.
>The Supreme Court's refusal to strike down an Indiana law requiring government-issued photo identification at the ballot box could disenfranchise minority and elderly voters at next week's primary and prompt other states to pass similar laws, voting advocates said Monday.
So....these are the 'advocates' of all voters? Exactly who, in a democracy, DOESN'T advocate voting? A very conspicuous absence of needed adjectives here!
The court, in a splintered 6-3 ruling Monday, said Indiana's law, which took effect in 2006 and requires voters to present a state or federal photo ID card at the ballot box, does not violate the First or 14th amendments. The court said the law served as a justifiable protection to the electoral process.
6-3 is a pretty wide margin on this Court with its reliable voting blocs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.