Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Officials Looking At Possible Abuse Among FLDS Boys
Associated Press ^ | April 30, 2008

Posted on 04/30/2008 11:11:05 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

By APRIL CASTRO

Associated Press Writer

AUSTIN, Texas - Texas officials told legislators Wednesday that they're investigating the possible sexual abuse of some young boys taken from a polygamist sect's ranch, as well as broken bones among other children.

The disclosures are the first suggestions that anyone other than teenage girls may have been sexually or physically abused at the ranch run by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a renegade Mormon sect.

In written and oral testimony provided to lawmakers Wednesday, officials with the state Department of Family and Protective Services said interviews and journal entries suggested that boys may have been sexually abused.

Earlier, the department's commissioner, Carey Cockerell, told lawmakers that at least 41 children, some of them "very young," have evidence of broken bones.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fishing; flds; govtabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-259 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2008 11:11:06 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

In before the accusations LEOs faked this evidence.


2 posted on 04/30/2008 11:13:19 AM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Their case is falling apart so they are fishing for something else. This whole thing looks like Janet Reno’s tenure as AG in Florida. I wonder how many years and how many millions in legal fees will be expended before everyone is exonerated and the state slaps itself on the wrist. No matter. There will be big budgets between now and then and after all that’s what really matters.


3 posted on 04/30/2008 11:19:19 AM PDT by BitBucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

No kidding. I’ll bet sales of tinfoil hats are up. ;)


4 posted on 04/30/2008 11:20:56 AM PDT by MizSterious (The Republican Party is infected with the RINO-virus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I think the LEOs broke the bones just so they could pin it all on the blameless as the driven snow FLDS men. The FLDS men deserve medals for their upright behavior so far, only knocking up young girls who deserved it.


5 posted on 04/30/2008 11:21:53 AM PDT by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It’s like Islam. For some reason, polygamy also always seems to lead to the sexual use of male children by the powerful males in charge (those who can get multiple wives). In Islam, it is because the head male is given huge status, and less dominant (that is, younger, less wealthy males) have no status and will never get wives.

Some of these men then turn to homosexuality themselves, which is why this is so widespread in Muslim countries, and the powerful married males also begin to regard any weaker being as sexual prey. Abuse of male children by older relatives, including their own fathers, is practically the norm in most Muslim countries, and I wouldn’t be surprised to find that its the same in the FLDS groups.


6 posted on 04/30/2008 11:22:26 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
at least 41 children, some of them "very young," have evidence of broken bones.

From pediatric fracture estimates: on average, boys have a 42% chance of sustaining at least one fracture between the ages of 0 and 16 years. Girls have a 27% chance.

If these were (say) a hundred 16-yr old children with a 50/50 gender split we would expect 21+14 = 35 broken bones amongst them. Whether 41 is suspicious or not depends on the number of children, their age range and gender profile. Pediatric fractures are very different in severity and incidence to adult fractures.

7 posted on 04/30/2008 11:24:53 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket
Their case is falling apart

What case are you referring to?

This is a custody review, not a civil or criminal case.

And in the custody review, the cultists' custody claims are looking very weak indeed.

8 posted on 04/30/2008 11:30:41 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket
Their case is falling apart so they are fishing for something else.

Oh hardly. They already know that teen girls were raped. . .half of the girls either are or were pregnant. That in itself is enough to send all the adults away for a long time, as they either participated directly or ignored the abuse.

9 posted on 04/30/2008 11:31:55 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Addendum: if we have 41 fractures from a group of 464 children then ... thats pretty low. Assuming a linear age profile 0 to 16 of these 464, 50/50 gender split and a linear fracture incidence with age I'd estimate a control group with the same characteristics would have about 70 fractures.

Of course not all fractures are born equal. There may be something skewed about these injuries. And my assumptions may be way wrong. But the bare fact of 41 fractures in 464 children is not on the face of it suspicious.

10 posted on 04/30/2008 11:33:24 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

Interesting process. First decide what you know. Then look for the evidence.


11 posted on 04/30/2008 11:36:02 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket

BitBucket,

It must be terrible to be you. How can you possibly survive, thinking the worse about everyone who has a sense of responsibility. And at the same time, taking up for those who exhibit irresponsible behavior.

I hope you never need the help of anyone in authority. It could possibly kill you to have to accept it. And goes without saying, you will have no gratitude, only criticism.


12 posted on 04/30/2008 11:36:38 AM PDT by i_dont_chat (Your choice if you take offense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Yea, 41 children having broken bones, especially with their relatively primitive lifestyle doesn't sound high to me, though the types of fractures and kids with multiple fractures might tell a different tale for some.

This does explain why a number of the children were taken to the hospital, and their parents weren't being told why.

However, I wouldn't make too much of this. The legislature is grilling children's services officials, and the officials are telling them what they are doing. This is more of a report on how they are investigating rather than results of an investigation.

The main evidence is the number of pregnant teens, and the main thing the officials are doing now is waiting for the results of the DNA tests, so they can piece together a better picture of things from that.

13 posted on 04/30/2008 11:40:38 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Your brand of objective analysis has no place here. This is a morality play, and the FLDS are the bad guys. Get with the program.


14 posted on 04/30/2008 11:41:00 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat

Funny thing. When I was a kid, we were told to look up to police officers, they were people to be trusted. Now, we are told to fear them and assume they will twist evidence to bust you. Have the police changed? No, more like people are just more paranoid these days.


15 posted on 04/30/2008 11:41:45 AM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket
Their case is falling apart

Actually it's not. Less and less are supporting the "rights" of the FLDS around here and are grudgingly saying maybe the State of Texas got it right. How big a case does CPS need to build to get you to have 2nd thoughts?

16 posted on 04/30/2008 11:43:52 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

“Mothers who stayed with their children for two weeks after the raid launched a coordinated effort to stymie investigators, coaching their children to not answer questions, Cockerell said.

He said the women and children would gather into apparent family units, with the children referring to several women as their mother, then the “women switched children in these family units ... making it difficult.”

“When asked, women and children would change their names and ages,” he said.

The CPS report also said authorities “tried to use bracelets to identify children, but the women and children removed the bracelets or rubbed the wording off them.”

The report also said mothers at first refused to let the children undergo basic health screenings and that “many” teen girls declined to take pregnancy tests. “


Where else would someone find such united efforts among a group of mothers in these conditions?

Of all of the predictions of behavior that we would have made for a group of American moms under these conditions, I bet this would not have been among those predictions.

This is one of the saddest things that I have heard yet, just how deeply damaged are these women, is it too late to save them?


17 posted on 04/30/2008 11:44:14 AM PDT by ansel12 (Sons of Helaman- uniformed FLDS who enter houses without knocking and report novels, computers,TVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
Interesting process. First decide what you know. Then look for the evidence.

Considering that what they know is the evidence they have gathered so far, and that evidence would seem to indicate abuse of the girls occurred, it does seem pretty obvious to check for signs of abuse among the boys.

Are you suggesting they should ignore the evidence they have found so far?

18 posted on 04/30/2008 11:49:39 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
Agreed, the DNA tests are the main event.

I'm worried that the investigators would even mention the (perhaps atypically low) number of broken bones amongst the children. Are they merely responding to public queries with dry take-them or leave-them medical statistics, or are they trying to 'paint' the cult members as fiendish child-bone-breakers?

19 posted on 04/30/2008 11:50:38 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

For your ping-ees


20 posted on 04/30/2008 11:51:20 AM PDT by blu (Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

By a whole 4 minutes.


21 posted on 04/30/2008 11:54:47 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“I’m worried that the investigators would even mention the (perhaps atypically low) number of broken bones amongst the children. Are they merely responding to public queries with dry take-them or leave-them medical statistics, or are they trying to ‘paint’ the cult members as fiendish child-bone-breakers?”


The totals aren’t in yet.

“Although Cockerell didn’t elaborate on the broken bones, a report by his department’s Child Protective Services division said medical exams and interviews indicated “that at least 41 children have had broken bones in the past.”

“We do not have X-rays or complete medical information on many children so it is too early to draw any conclusions based on this information, but it is cause for concern and something we’ll continue to examine,” the CPS report said.”


22 posted on 04/30/2008 11:55:03 AM PDT by ansel12 (Sons of Helaman- uniformed FLDS who enter houses without knocking and report novels, computers,TVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Are they merely responding to public queries with dry take-them or leave-them medical statistics, or are they trying to 'paint' the cult members as fiendish child-bone-breakers?

It's hard to tell. All we have is the media's report on how the CPS workers responded to questions from the legislature.

I wouldn't doubt that the CPS is getting more than a bit tired of the FLDS and their lawyers trying to smear them any way they can, while also doing everything they can to obstruct their investigation.

That's part of the job for the CPS, but they're human, so it wouldn't be surprising for them to be a bit hostile toward the FLDS when they are questioned by the legislature.

23 posted on 04/30/2008 11:58:09 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
No doubt these boys who watch their friends who are girls get culled by graybeard 50 year olds, are lying. They are just typical bitter white boys who can't hack being used a labor and then at the age of sexuality being kicked out of the tribe into a society they hardly know. What ingrates! Free oatmeal, work, farming, construction and packed luchbag and bus ticket.

Once again, the non-Mormon community attacks the upright, hardworking, family centered Mormons with scurrilous lies and Narvoo like attacks!

24 posted on 04/30/2008 12:02:15 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
This is a morality play, and the FLDS are the bad guys. Get with the program.

Well, honestly, it would help their case some if their leader Warren Jeffs wasn't in prison for being an accomplice to raping young girls.

It would also help quite a bit if so doggone many of their children weren't simply missing - there are only 17 teenaged boys compared to 53 teenaged girls.

And it would really be great if more than half of the underaged girls who have been removed weren't pregnant or previously delivered babies.

And the people who are showing up saying that they had their kids taken away when they were thrown out of the FLDS, plus the people who have left and are talking to the police and reporters about the abuse they've suffered at the hands of FLDS members... well, maybe if all of those people didn't exist, the public could be a bit more sympathetic.

25 posted on 04/30/2008 12:07:56 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Woman at Japanese Okinawa suicide site at bottom of cliff where pure, loyal Japanese women protected themselves from abusive, lying American outsiders by jumping off cliffs for ..um....


26 posted on 04/30/2008 12:07:57 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Now, we are told to fear them and assume they will twist evidence to bust you. Have the police changed?

The answer is yes they have.

When I was a kid the police could not take your property with out a trial. If you had $1000 cash on you the police did not care. If you had a very nice new car it was yours not yours till the police wanted it.

When I was a kid a search warrant was not issued based on anonymous phone calls but on a sworn and signed statement.

27 posted on 04/30/2008 12:09:31 PM PDT by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
In case anyone wants to check out the statistics (to help them decide whether or not the Texas cult consists of bone-crunching Ogres) my source on pediatric fracture incidence is a single - though reasonably impressive - source which can be found Here

Thanks Ansell, I was wondering why the fracture count was so low. If they haven't finished counting yet then that would make sense. If the final count goes to ~80 fractures then that would be bang on the expectation value, given my limited picture of the childrens' demographic profile. /back of a fagpacket calculation

28 posted on 04/30/2008 12:09:59 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra; greyfoxx39
greyfoxx39 Thanks for the ping.

From pediatric fracture estimates: on average, boys have a 42% chance of sustaining at least one fracture between the ages of 0 and 16 years. Girls have a 27% chance.

Do these statistics say how the bones are broken? I'd bet a great many come from sports and other "play" activity. From what I've read, these children's activities consisted of scrubbing floors and other chores. Not many bones get broken scrubbing floors.

29 posted on 04/30/2008 12:12:55 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“Thanks Ansell, I was wondering why the fracture count was so low. If they haven’t finished counting yet then that would make sense. “


Reading the articles before you start with your defense would help on that score.


30 posted on 04/30/2008 12:16:39 PM PDT by ansel12 (Sons of Helaman- uniformed FLDS who enter houses without knocking and report novels, computers,TVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’d be willing to bet the women are pretty deeply damaged, and as to whether they can be saved- good question, most that have left on their own or during other raids seem to be able to function- but maybe their will was stronger than others that are more compliant.

My sister-in-law had class with some of those that left FLDS in AZ a few years ago- she said the younger women were rapidly adapting to their new situation but she didn’t think the older women would adapt, I imagine some could.


31 posted on 04/30/2008 12:17:34 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“Mothers who stayed with their children for two weeks after the raid launched a coordinated effort to stymie investigators, coaching their children to not answer questions, Cockerell said.

He said the women and children would gather into apparent family units, with the children referring to several women as their mother, then the “women switched children in these family units ... making it difficult.”

“When asked, women and children would change their names and ages,” he said.

The CPS report also said authorities “tried to use bracelets to identify children, but the women and children removed the bracelets or rubbed the wording off them.”
_____________________________
Not to mention the obviously fake tears the “distraught” mothers employed during television interviews. Bunch of sickos.


32 posted on 04/30/2008 12:18:52 PM PDT by cowdog77 (Circle the Wagons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mouser
When I was a kid a search warrant was not issued based on anonymous phone calls but on a sworn and signed statement.

In this case, the search warrant wasn't based on anonymous phone calls, it was based on the sworn affidavits of the Texas Rangers and what they witnessed when they went to check on the validity of the phone call.

33 posted on 04/30/2008 12:19:18 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Do these statistics say how the bones are broken?

Not in the source I cite. One can find percentage incidence of broken chins, broken legs etc as single data points from a simple internet search, but I couldn't find anything that gave an all-body profile OR a cause profile.

I would guess anecdotally that sports, slip/trip and falling from height (out of trees, off a swing etc) are the major sources of pediatric bone breakage.

34 posted on 04/30/2008 12:22:28 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
In this case, the search warrant wasn't based on anonymous phone calls

I read the first warrant was based on phone calls from a girl who they cannot find who probably dose not exist about a man who has never lived on this property. If you have different information about the first warrant please post a link.

35 posted on 04/30/2008 12:26:09 PM PDT by mouser (run the rats out its the only hope we have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Interesting, in my own children; I had three girls and had two that had bone fractures ages 0-18. Higher than average.


36 posted on 04/30/2008 12:26:28 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Reading the articles before you start with your defense would help on that score.

Err, what are you on about?

What 'defence' are you referring to? I pointed out that 41 pediatric breakages out of 464 children was atypically low. And so it is.

Step away from the keyboard. You need to stop mashing the "Witchhunt" key right now.

37 posted on 04/30/2008 12:26:34 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I think it is likely the authorities were just making a report on what they are doing and the media decided it was a story. It may turn out to be a story or not depending on the outcome.


38 posted on 04/30/2008 12:28:50 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket

There case is falling apart?

Really? 60% of the teenage girls are or have been pregnant, and their case is falling apart?

I’d say someone is jumping to conclusions on making such bold statements.


39 posted on 04/30/2008 12:30:14 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

Yes, that seems a sensible way of looking at it Tammy.

Well Goodnight all.


40 posted on 04/30/2008 12:31:51 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Don’t you know? Unless you are in the “string em all up right now and round up the mainline LDS folks while your at it” then you are defending the FLDS no matter how objective your statements are.


41 posted on 04/30/2008 12:33:57 PM PDT by Domandred (McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cowdog77

“Not to mention the obviously fake tears the “distraught” mothers employed during television interviews. Bunch of sickos.”


While watching another large “crocodile tears” scene that had a large number of women in it, I realized that it wasn’t just the fake tears and the dabbing at the eye.

What struck me was that there was no variation among the women, there wasn’t one or several of them heaving deep sobs, there wasn’t one or several of them wailing in loud uncontrollable cries, there was not a case of a woman running to a wild embrace by her friends because she was breaking and collapsing.

All of them had the same exact level of distress, all of them had the same exact level of emotional display, all of them shared the same timing when it came to a shared tear session or a recovery from that session.


42 posted on 04/30/2008 12:38:21 PM PDT by ansel12 (Sons of Helaman- uniformed FLDS who enter houses without knocking and report novels, computers,TVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

Depends on what the fractures are... some are common, others are not... and some can only occur from pressures on the bones one would not expect to see a child or adult exposed to other than intentional abuse.

I openly admit I have not been following this thing closely, but I am begining to think that there are a group here on FR who are becoming like the David Westerfield defenders.. going to never believe that this sect has done anything wrong, no matter what facts may come about.

They may be exonerated.. but nothing that’s been reported so far points to this outcome. Time will tell.


43 posted on 04/30/2008 12:38:28 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket
Their case is falling apart so they are fishing for something else.

Did someone mention fishing?

The investigation has been mishandled from the git go. Now CPS is leaking information to the press to justify their actions. It won't fly.

If CPS had any evidence of sexual abuse, they would have taken individuals into protective custody, and no one would object. But when they came in with a net, they are admitting they are engaging in a massive fishing expedition.

It is highly unlikely they will be able to justify their actions. The outcome of the June 5th hearings will be interesting.

44 posted on 04/30/2008 12:38:46 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BitBucket

“Their case is falling apart so they are fishing for something else.”

LOL! God, what an idiot.


45 posted on 04/30/2008 12:38:51 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mouser
All calls to emergency services are issued a blanket “Call Warrant” which simply allow an emergency responder to investigate the call. This is different than the warrant authorizing CPS to enter and take the children (which was based on what the Texas Rangers testified to in responding to the “Call Warrant”.) Police and Emergency Services cannot, nor should not make a judgment that a call to Emergency Services is not legitimate until investigating. This is why “Call Warrants” are not bench warrants, they are open authorization under Texas Law to answer emergency response calls.
46 posted on 04/30/2008 12:40:33 PM PDT by mnehrling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
"going to never believe that this sect has done anything wrong, no matter what facts may come about."

I don't think it's that as much as it is questioning the legality of the whole thing to start with.

Carolyn

47 posted on 04/30/2008 12:42:21 PM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“Step away from the keyboard. You need to stop mashing the “Witchhunt” key right now.”


Pretty strong reaction to someone that merely pointed out that it would be useful for you to read the article first, before you start your defense.

Almost like a “witchhunt” reaction.


48 posted on 04/30/2008 12:42:26 PM PDT by ansel12 (Sons of Helaman- uniformed FLDS who enter houses without knocking and report novels, computers,TVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

What legality? They got a warrant, and they executed it.

There’s been nothing illegal about whats gone on to date.

Some may not like the Judges decisions, but they haven’t acted outside the law.


49 posted on 04/30/2008 12:43:37 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mouser

“If you have different information about the first warrant please post a link.”

LOL!. Jeez, why is it no suprize these pervert-defending morons can’t ever do their own research? People who want to know facts do research. People who don’t, well, don’t.

There have been dozens of links posted that I know about. Probably dozens more as I don’t FReep too much.


50 posted on 04/30/2008 12:45:44 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson