Skip to comments.
"Don't Blame Darwinism for Hitler! Blame Christianity!"
Jewcy - What Matters Now ^
| April 30, 2008?
| David Klinghoffer
Posted on 05/01/2008 3:09:53 PM PDT by sitetest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320, 321-328 last
To: Antoninus
Your premise has been completely exploded by dozens of posts on this threadCan you please point to a post that shows that Hitler was attempting to create a new species of Homo, or that he cited Darwin as a source. Absent either of these means that I have conclusively proven that Darwin was not a source for Hitler's euginics program.
Sit down and shut up!
321
posted on
06/24/2008 8:56:29 AM PDT
by
Soliton
(Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
To: Antoninus
it wasn't racism in the same sense Did Bill Clinton teach you to how to invent preposterous semantic distinctions for obfuscatory purposes, or did you teach him?
322
posted on
06/24/2008 11:16:37 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
To: Antoninus
And you'll recall that the British had as much or more contempt for the Irish than they ever had for black Africans.
The concept of superior/inferior races springs almost directly from social Darwinism in the mid-19th century. Today's Free Advise: When you make mutually exclusive assertions, insert lots of padding between them. That way, you have some hope that the reader will forget the first one before encountering the second one, and thus fail to notice that you are spouting nonsense.
323
posted on
06/24/2008 11:18:16 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
To: Antoninus
they had a robust eugenics program Yes, the Nazis based their policies on Intelligent Design theory.
324
posted on
06/24/2008 11:19:41 AM PDT
by
steve-b
(The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
To: sitetest
Stein didn’t say darwinism caused nazism, but that you couldn’t have nazism without eugenics and you coudn’t have eugenics without darwinism.
To: Free Descendant
you coudn’t have eugenics without darwinismYOU DID HAVE EUGENICS 2300 YEARS BEFORE DARWIN!
326
posted on
06/24/2008 9:29:30 PM PDT
by
Soliton
(Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
To: Soliton
“YOU DID HAVE EUGENICS 2300 YEARS BEFORE DARWIN!”
Source Please. Eugenics does not refer to animal breeding if that is what you are referring to.
In any case, the state sponsered eugenics of the previous two centuries was clearly inspired by darwinian ideas.
To: Free Descendant
eugenics is just another name for breeding humans. See Plato’s Republic.
328
posted on
06/26/2008 8:35:28 AM PDT
by
Soliton
(Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320, 321-328 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson