Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The new, new math: Clinton's delegate count looks grim, Obama's electability questionable
MSNBC/The National Journal ^ | April. 29, 2008 | Charlie Cook

Posted on 05/02/2008 9:39:11 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Despite the recent show of strength by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., the odds against_her_winning the Democratic presidential nomination are as imposing as ever—and probably worse.

There was a time when one of the stronger arguments in favor of nominating Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was that he was more electable than Clinton.

The thinking at the time was that Clinton was so polarizing, she could get close to winning a general election but would have difficulty getting over the top.

Now, about the only plausible argument that Obama is more electable is to claim that Clinton’s backers would probably get_over an Obama nomination better and sooner than vice versa.

Indeed, while Obama might lose some states by narrower margins than Clinton, his weakness among downscale and older white voters raises questions about whether he would be as competitive as Clinton in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida, or, for that matter, run as strongly as Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., did in 2004.

But the delegate math is the delegate math, and there is little if any good news there for Clinton.

Almost half of the delegate advantage she netted against Obama in Pennsylvania was offset by losses of superdelegates the same week. Colby College political scientist and delegate selection expert Anthony Corrado estimates that Clinton would need to win about 69 percent of the remaining delegates, a virtual impossibility given proportional representation of the nominating contests.

In recent months, Clinton has been losing up to three superdelegates for every one she has picked up.

One superdelegate in a Southern state, clearly a Clinton sympathizer, said it would be political suicide for him to oppose Obama, pointing out that the black community would be furious. The best support he could offer Clinton would be to remain neutral until it’s over.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; election; elections; hilary; obama; superdelegates; wrightwingconspiracy
It's like a badly written soap opera.
1 posted on 05/02/2008 9:39:12 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
it would be political suicide for him to oppose Obama

I wonder if he can explain the purpose of superdelegates.

2 posted on 05/02/2008 9:42:07 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
I wonder if he can explain the purpose of superdelegates.

It's interesting that the superdelegate system includes a large contingent of elected officials: a group that can hardly be expected to rise above the preferences of their local constituents.

3 posted on 05/02/2008 9:45:48 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And yet there are still many conservatives who have their panties in a bind over Operation Chaos.


4 posted on 05/02/2008 9:49:12 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As well as he has bonded with “Starbucks” Democrats, he has not done so well with white, “Lunch Bucket” Democrats. Obama’s appeal is a bit too exotic for their tastes.

Yes, there's quite a bit of "exotic" in Obama...
 
Obama: Man of the World
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: March 6, 2007

Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to
prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that
seemed delightfully uncalculated [...], Mr. Obama described the
call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at
sunset."

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06kristof.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
http://nevadathunder.com/?p=3626




----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it!
www.AnySoldier.com

5 posted on 05/02/2008 9:49:26 AM PDT by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Something to keep in mind: All the Rats who have jumped ship on the Clinton’s had better hope and pray she doesn’t get elected because there will be hell to pay. And Pelosi doesn’t want the witch in the White House.


6 posted on 05/02/2008 9:50:20 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cook seeing the electoral college handwriting on the wall. Amazing, isn’t it, that a strong conservative could CRUSH either of these two, and we’re stuck with Captain Queeg.


7 posted on 05/02/2008 9:53:16 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

You got that right. They’ll suddenly find all their affairs, tax cheating, and other “indiscretions” made public by the Clinton FBI-file machine.


8 posted on 05/02/2008 9:54:31 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
And yet there are still many conservatives who have their panties in a bind over Operation Chaos.

Agreed. This is shaping up to be a classic Mexican-standoff. Further, it reminds me of the final standoff scene in "Reservoir Dogs".

9 posted on 05/02/2008 9:54:35 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

I sincerely wish FR would get properly calibrated on this. Here are the things that do not matter:

1) It does not matter that Obama is more leftist than Hillary. It is the middle that decides elections and they won’t support him.

2) It does not matter that McCain is not as extreme a right wing candidate as many would like. He is rightward of either Hillary or Obama. And worse, far far worse, the Obama people will draw the same conclusion about Hillary and she being leftward of McCain. They Will Come Home.

3) It does not matter hugely what the far right or far left think. The middle wins elections. McCain is far more a centrist with a centrist’s reputation than Obama. THAT can win this election and prevent surrender in Iraq, overt pro choice justices replacing those retiring, moderation in the tax increases the Dem Congress will impose, a more conservative universal health care approach than Obama or Clinton would impose, AND perhaps even some stronger enforcement provisions in the inevitable comprehensive immigration reform bill to come.

The Middle Wins Elections. Obama is much farther from the middle than Hillary. That is why FR needs to prefer him to Hillary. McCain is much closer to the middle than Obama.


10 posted on 05/02/2008 9:54:52 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unkus
All the Rats who have jumped ship on the Clinton’s had better hope and pray she doesn’t get elected because there will be hell to pay.

Which is why the people who will be fighting most bitterly on Obama's behalf at the convention will be the former Clintonites.

11 posted on 05/02/2008 9:55:28 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obammy has got about as much chance of being elected as I do.

He’s creepy and arrogant. He gets creepier every time I see him. He has the demeanor of “The True Believer”, smug, arrogant, condescending. He’s a Manchurian candidate. Creepy, really, really creepy. Elmer Gantry, the Latte’ version.

Obammy’s not really a real American, he lives in another universe.

I can’t believe that the Dim Dhims will actually nominate him. Hillary would be a tougher candidate. With Obammy, it’s gonna be worse than McGovern.


12 posted on 05/02/2008 9:57:01 AM PDT by garyhope (It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam. TWP VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

It’s a beautiful thing—as long as the witch or ovomit don’t get elected.


13 posted on 05/02/2008 9:57:18 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Good summary.

I would argue that if Clinton wrested the nomination from Obama there would a significant number of Democrats who would be too disgusted with the whole process to bother voting.

But we can't count on the disillusioned being numerous enough to defeat Clinton by staying home.

14 posted on 05/02/2008 9:58:23 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s more fun than having to vote for the Jerry Ford clone with the bad temper this November.


15 posted on 05/02/2008 10:01:06 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garyhope

Also there is the Michelle Obama factor. She is one mean, nasty woman who hates America. She just looks mean and spiteful. Would love to see her in a cat fight with Hitlery.


16 posted on 05/02/2008 10:01:27 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Good review. Clinton needs to be put down as quickly as possible and end any hope that she may have of becoming the nominee. Obama can't win the Presidency, imo but Clinton may pull it off.
17 posted on 05/02/2008 10:07:29 AM PDT by deport ( -- Cue Spooky Music --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unkus
You're right. Thanks for bringing that up. She's tougher than TaRayzah 57 Varieties Carry also. She's not strung out on gin raisins either.
18 posted on 05/02/2008 10:09:57 AM PDT by garyhope (It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam. TWP VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Well, I think we’re all nervous about what might happen. We’ll see on the morning of November 5th how this all turns out. If the Democrat is elected president, we may all look back and see turning points, strategies that backfired, problems not addressed.

I’m all for Operation Chaos if it results in a McCain victory and maybe some more Republicans in Congress, due to Democrat meltdown from the top of their ticket to the down ballot races. I just don’t know where this is all going to end up.................


19 posted on 05/02/2008 10:11:45 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I am still against it, and I have written Rush a couple of times pleading with him to stop.

The practical reason is that Obama is much more beatable in November - let him take Hillary out now.

The philosophical reason is that conservatives understand that actions can have unintended consequences. One shouldn’t mess with forces that can’t be controlled, and we can’t control what happens in the Democratic nominating process, or the mistakes candidates make, or the news cycles. Operation Chaos could put Hillary in the White House.


20 posted on 05/02/2008 10:11:51 AM PDT by NRPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRPM
The philosophical reason is that conservatives understand that actions can have unintended consequences. One shouldn’t mess with forces that can’t be controlled, and we can’t control what happens in the Democratic nominating process, or the mistakes candidates make, or the news cycles. Operation Chaos could put Hillary in the White House.

So you do nothing? It really don't matter to me which one of these clowns win. In fact I think Obama is more dangerous, so the prospect of Hillary getting their nomination does not bother me in the slightest. The longer these two wrestle in the mud, the better. Less money for the general and less unification in the party. Sounds like a win-win.

21 posted on 05/02/2008 10:25:17 AM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
“It's interesting that the superdelegate system includes a large contingent of elected officials: a group that can hardly be expected to rise above the preferences of their local constituents.”

Something those elected officials better stop and think about....

Lots of Osama Obama wins came before anyone knew about all his “friends”.

A good share of the RAT voters are too stupid to vote anything but straight party ( one button voting) and if they don't now want to vote for the top of the ticket, the bottom is screwed too!

22 posted on 05/02/2008 10:25:33 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
I wonder if he can explain the purpose of superdelegates.

The superdelegate system, which was put in place after Carter lost to Reagan was put in place so that the gullible Democratic voters would never be allowed to nominate another clueless peanut farmer as their presidential candidate.

Ironically, as a former President, Carter is a superdelegate for life.

23 posted on 05/02/2008 10:37:19 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's like a badly written soap opera

Perfect analogy

24 posted on 05/02/2008 10:37:22 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Typical Gun-Toting, Jesus-Loving Gramma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
Yes I know their purpose and YOU know their purpose, but does this dweeb know their purpose?

O'bama is starting to look like a clueless peanut farmer, isn't he?

If ever there was an occasion where having "superdelegates" might solve something besides stroking the egos of the camera whores, this is it.

25 posted on 05/02/2008 10:41:20 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: garyhope
'Creepy' is a very good word to describe this guy.
26 posted on 05/02/2008 10:42:38 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

But they all “HATE BUSH”!! and the ‘Repukes’ in general with a passion.
That alone might send a lot them to the polls.


27 posted on 05/02/2008 10:45:24 AM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JCG

Thank you for posting the link to TheReligionofPeace.com. It’s a great resource for putting the world view in perspective.


28 posted on 05/02/2008 10:49:41 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die (Words to live/die by: (Nathan Hale) I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
At this point yeah you do nothing. CHAOS should stop. The balance is currently right. HRC will be sacrificed to the alter of PC, and will take down the nominated but unelectable-Bama with her. It doesn't look like enough super-delegates are going to become profiles in courage and take it away from the Black guy, even if they think she can win.

I also think this type of mischief voting is just plain wrong. There is no sense in messing up an already messed up process. This will come back to haunt Republicans.

"Never interrupt your enemies when they are busy destroying themselves"

29 posted on 05/02/2008 10:51:59 AM PDT by CDFingers (EALM: Ethnic Americans Living in Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
O'bama is starting to look like a clueless peanut farmer, isn't he?

Yes, pretty much.

If ever there was an occasion where having "superdelegates" might solve something besides stroking the egos of the camera whores, this is it.

Twenty four years ago the far left was much more of a fringe group in the Democratic Party. The Party leaders could be expected to moderate the extremists. Now the party leaders are the extremists.

30 posted on 05/02/2008 10:54:54 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The result here could be wonderful: Hillary resurgent but the party feeling forced to nominate an already-discredited Snobama.


31 posted on 05/02/2008 10:56:48 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We're in for hard times no matter who wins in November. As for Rush Limbaugh, the entertainer, and his Op Chaos...Hillary is up and Obama's down but I don't hear Rush switching sides. He wants her to win. Being the conservative opposition to a black presidential candidate (and perhaps the winner) is far too dense a minefield for Rush to navigate in his sunset years.
32 posted on 05/02/2008 10:57:01 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CDFingers
It doesn't look like enough super-delegates are going to become profiles in courage and take it away from the Black guy, even if they think she can win.

I agree. They are probably thinking, at this point, that it's so risky to shaft Obama, it's preferable to nominate him and see a Republican president for another 4 years. With McCain they will be able to do a lot of damage anyway; they'll have the legislature and they can thwart any attempt he makes to put another conservative on the Court. (Like that would happen!) They're thinking, let McCain discredit himself and his party, at least we'll keep our base, our plantation, and the Congress.

33 posted on 05/02/2008 11:05:12 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Well said.


34 posted on 05/02/2008 11:16:23 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Owen
The Middle Wins Elections. Obama is much farther from the middle than Hillary. That is why FR needs to prefer him to Hillary. McCain is much closer to the middle than Obama.

You are spot on! McCain can draw from Hillary's supporters but he will not draw any of Hussein Obama's supporters. McCain's only real chance is against Obama. The Left will turn out in record numbers this election since the White House was stolen from them in two straight elections.

35 posted on 05/02/2008 11:19:25 AM PDT by AmusedBystander (Typical White Person #8,675,309)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
They're thinking, let McCain discredit himself and his party, at least we'll keep our base, our plantation, and the Congress.

Right. For Dems McCain is not really that bad a loss in the short term and he could be a good thing for them in the long term. They'll get to blaim a Republican for the failure of liberal policies and be ready for 2012.

Hopefully McCain won't turn out that way, but now would be a good time to get conservatives elected to Congress.

36 posted on 05/02/2008 11:38:58 AM PDT by CDFingers (EALM: Ethnic Americans Living in Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

My panties will become unbound when Hillary drops out.


37 posted on 05/02/2008 12:08:54 PM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I like the results of OC thus far and, uh, well, I don’t wear panties.


38 posted on 05/02/2008 12:20:40 PM PDT by Gator113 (Obama is a member of the Far Wright Conspiracy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

If you like the results, I was not referring to you. I was referring to people who foam at the mouth everytime OC is mentioned.


39 posted on 05/02/2008 12:24:02 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated [...], Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset."

The fact that Hussein can recall the Adhan, from memory, off the top of his head, and recite it perfectly in Arabic, tells me all I need to know

Either he has one hell of a memory, to recall it from his childhood, or it's something he can recall perfectly because he says it every day.

40 posted on 05/02/2008 12:48:10 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." — George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die
Thank you for posting the link to TheReligionofPeace.com. It?s a great resource for putting the world view in perspective.

Glad to do it and I agree.  It doesn't take many readings to step out of the Obama/Clinton/McCain/GWB dream world of "Islam is peace" nonsense.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it!
www.AnySoldier.com

41 posted on 05/02/2008 6:26:17 PM PDT by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Owen
“I sincerely wish FR would get properly calibrated on this....”

Thank you for a whiff of common sense. Americans traditionally transcend other ethnic/cultural groups by virtue of our ability to compromise to a workable solution to get the job done. Ya wouldn’t know that from hangin’ around here tho.

42 posted on 05/02/2008 6:34:50 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson