Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush asks for defense money for Poland ($20 million LOL!!!!1)
AP ^ | Fri May 2 | By DESMOND BUTLER

Posted on 05/03/2008 7:36:12 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has asked Congress for $20 million for military aid to Poland as it seeks to complete a missile defense deal.

The administration wants to build a European missile shield that would include a radar installation in the Czech Republic and 10 interceptors in Poland. Officials have been trying to reach a deal with the two countries before President Bush leaves office in January.

The U.S. is nearing a deal with Prague, but negotiations with Warsaw have lagged. The talks had been complicated by Poland's demand for help to upgrade its military in exchange for allowing the interceptors.

The request for money for Poland comes at a crucial time as the two sides are set to meet in new negotiations next week on the military aid question.

The Bush administration made its request public Friday as part of a larger budget document, but the document did not tie the money to negotiations with Poland. A State Department official, who asked for anonymity because he was not authorized to comment, confirmed that the $20 million request was intended to allow it to satisfy the Polish demands.

The U.S. missile defense plans have become one of the thorniest issues in U.S.-Russian relations. Moscow opposes the U.S. plan to build part of its global missile defense system so close to Russian borders, arguing that it would undermine the Russian nuclear deterrent.

The Polish government argues that the U.S. security upgrade is necessary because Russia has threatened to target Poland with nuclear missiles if it should allow the interceptors.

The administration's request would have to be approved by Congress before the money would be made available. However, the request is a signal to Poland in the negotiations that it wants to accommodate at least some of Warsaw's conditions.

Polish officials have said they are looking for help to acquire air defenses against short- to medium-range missiles. Negotiators have asked for expensive Patriot 3 or THAAD missiles and have identified 17 areas of the Polish military that the United States could help modernize. Interceptors for the planned U.S. shield are for protection against long-range missiles.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allies; europe; iran; missiledefense; poland; polishallies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2008 7:36:13 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

What about protecting the US borders?


2 posted on 05/03/2008 7:37:04 AM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Bahamas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

So true. The problem is a lack of illegal immigration threads on FR.


3 posted on 05/03/2008 7:39:43 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen
What about protecting the US borders?

Protecting the borders would prevent the entry of sufficient numbers of exploitable workers to suppress wages to the satisfaction of the chamber of commerce .

4 posted on 05/03/2008 7:43:06 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Just change your names to ******dez, or **rez, or **mez and see how much money he sends.


5 posted on 05/03/2008 7:43:21 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

OUtrageous isn’t it?

“The U.S. is nearing a deal with Prague, but negotiations with Warsaw have lagged. The talks had been complicated by Poland’s demand for help to upgrade its military in exchange for allowing the interceptors.”

Give Poland NOTHING.

I’m sick and tired of paying other sountries off. This will benefit THEM without is paying them off.

I don’t want my tax money being spent like this. Give me the money that I EARNED. Stop giving it as bribes to other countries. And secure our borders!


6 posted on 05/03/2008 7:44:45 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

“Give Poland NOTHING.”

So host this crap in your own garden.


7 posted on 05/03/2008 7:46:23 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Give Poland NOTHING.

Poland has been one of our staunchest allies in the WOT. I have no problem eliminating aid to countries that continually stab us in the back, but Poland is not one of them.

8 posted on 05/03/2008 7:54:22 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Give Poland NOTHING.

Myopic thinking

20 million is chump change compared to the billions we waste on countries who hate us.

20 million is well worth the investment

9 posted on 05/03/2008 7:58:14 AM PDT by Popman (Typical bitter white male clinging to my religion and guns......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Yes, show one of our staunchest allies the door because they want (A) something in return for their support and (B) realize that this move is incredibly unpopular, particularly with their most lovable of neighbors, and want some form of protection. $20 million? How much federal largess was spent in merely your congressional district last year? I’d say it is perfectly reasonable for Poland to expect something. If you treat your friends the same way when they ask something of you nmh, it must be a trifle one-sided relationship


10 posted on 05/03/2008 7:58:28 AM PDT by Namyak (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
We'll give you 20 million but you have to send us some of these:


11 posted on 05/03/2008 7:59:27 AM PDT by stravinskyrules (Why is it that whenever I hear a piece of music I don't like, it's always by Villa-Lobos?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

I love the Polish people. They are in the middle of hell in Europe. There isn’t enough money to protect them from the people they are stuck between.


12 posted on 05/03/2008 8:03:20 AM PDT by bmwcyle (I always rely on God and Guns in that order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Thank goodness for the Polish. From King John III Sobieski in the 17th Century to John Paul II in the 20th, they’ve been doing more than their fair share to save western civilization and liberty.


13 posted on 05/03/2008 8:10:30 AM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stravinskyrules

For $20 million I can send Bush a picture of my haired ass. Looks like people here don’t get LOL in the topic.


14 posted on 05/03/2008 8:10:31 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

“Just change your names to ******dez, or **rez, or **mez and see how much money he sends.”

Better yet, change those Polish names to Mohammed and Mustapha and Naji and Ali. After all, that’s who the Administration really hands our money over to, hundreds upon hundreds of millions of dollars. The problem with you Poles is that a) you are not Mohammedans and b) you are Roman Catholics but so close to Orthodox lands that maybe a little rubbed off on you and that, my friend, has been good enough with the American government to get you bombed and attacked by American financed Mohammedan jihadis since the 1990s.


15 posted on 05/03/2008 8:11:19 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Meant to ping #15 to you. Sorry!


16 posted on 05/03/2008 8:11:57 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
The real question is why is the US picking up the tens of billions of dollars, and political fallout and hassle, of putting these interceptors to prevent a rag head V2 copy from dumping a dirty bomb on a major European city? Isn't there a European Union or something?

Why isn't the self described biggest and wealthiest economy protecting itself?

17 posted on 05/03/2008 8:13:18 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
Myopic thinking

Agreed. We gave Pakistan $300 million in military aid.

18 posted on 05/03/2008 8:16:46 AM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
Maaaahvalous.

Nothing against Poland, but sheesh, c'mon. We're giving money, aid, and/or arms to every country with its hand out while WE are being invaded by the millions.

Something is FUBAR -- Our troops are protecting Iraq's borders (plural) while we're putting OUR own Border Patrol agents in Federal Prison for giving criminal illegal aliens a dirty look or for not saying 'Please'.

19 posted on 05/03/2008 8:40:36 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

You may not understand the situation.

First of all, the missile defense site in eastern Europe will be positioned perfectly to conduct intercepts of Iranian missiles. That is why we’re looking for a site there.

Secondly, Poland, especially their special forces, have been an extremely active ally in the war on terror. Upgrading their capabilities will strengthen both our defenses.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iy-zyxhTJSA

Lastly, Poland is now a new member of NATO and they need to upgrade their military from the Warsaw Pact model. It is much better if they look to the US for these upgrades than if they feel compelled to look east.


20 posted on 05/03/2008 8:45:39 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Go ask Putin for the 20 mill


21 posted on 05/03/2008 8:47:40 AM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

That is exactly right. The opposition to border security and true immigration reform doesn’t come just from “liberals.” Many pro-business groups most often associated with Republicans are working diligently to prevent us from securing our borders and adopting sensible immigration policies.

Those groups include the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Federation of Independent Businesses and the National Foreign Trade Council.


22 posted on 05/03/2008 8:50:55 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

Two separate issues and mixing them is self-defeating. The lack of border security comes from a lack of political and national will, not because we aid our allies militarily.


23 posted on 05/03/2008 8:54:05 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

This shows a lack of understanding of how missile defense works. The missile defense site in eastern Europe will allow interceptors to be fired at Iranian missiles at an earlier point in their trajectory when they can be intercepted more effectively. The sites aren’t there just to protect Europe. They’re there to protect America more readily.


24 posted on 05/03/2008 8:59:57 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan; FARS
First of all, the missile defense site in eastern Europe will be positioned perfectly to conduct intercepts of Iranian missiles.

Works for me.

25 posted on 05/03/2008 9:02:21 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

We’re not asking anyone for $20 million, we’re asking for $20 billion.


26 posted on 05/03/2008 9:06:56 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
We’re not asking anyone for $20 million, we’re asking for $20 billion

What?

27 posted on 05/03/2008 9:19:05 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Should be $200M, with the $ deducted from Germany’s and Saudi arabia’s military aid. Poland is one of our best and most pro-American allies. Far better than most of “old Europe.” Even with their limited resources, they have put “boots on the ground” with the US. If any European country is deserving of military aid, it is Poland!


28 posted on 05/03/2008 9:21:33 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Iranian missiles won't be able to hit the US for decades, hence my quip of Iranians copying North Koreans, copying Russian copying NAZI era V2's.

It is very hard to ‘chase’ and intercepts a missile, so the interceptors are in the way of oncoming missiles, missiles headed towards Europe.

I could see the Iranians with a lot of luck, fielding a nuclear armed, Europe reaching missile with in ten years.

29 posted on 05/03/2008 9:26:19 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Do you want me to write that once again ?


30 posted on 05/03/2008 9:30:16 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
Do you want me to write that once again ?

Not unless you want to make the same mistake twice.  The article YOU posted says "20 million".  YOU also added to the headline "20 million".  Am I missing something here?   

31 posted on 05/03/2008 9:38:18 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

That is complete nonsense. You know nothing of multistage rocketry if you believe that Iran is that far from fielding a missile capable of hitting the US. Either that, or you haven’t been paying attention. Iran now has a space program to launch satellites into space. Even the Russians admit that this is a bad signed when combined with Iran’s evasiveness on its enrichment program.


32 posted on 05/03/2008 9:39:32 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

“The article YOU posted says “20 million”.”

Because that’s how “much” Bush’s administration wants to give, not how much Poland wants to get.


33 posted on 05/03/2008 9:42:10 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen
Sometimes the best place to protect your borders is on someone else's real estate. Poland is our ally and is standing up to that viper Putin. This is money well-spent.
34 posted on 05/03/2008 9:58:44 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Popman
$20M is the cost of us operating in Iraq for about 8 hours.

Everyone who is against this tiny expenditure of money is an idiot. There is no such thing as friends or allies in the real world. People (nations) only help you if it is in their interests to do so. Sometimes cash has to change hands in order to secure people's help. Poland is inclined to help us, but they needed a little extra encouragement :-)

It would also be helpful for people to lose the whole right vs. wrong in terms of geopolitics, and the whole labeling thing.

35 posted on 05/03/2008 10:06:17 AM PDT by tlj18 (Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Well being aware of vaunted Iranian technology, them not even having their own refinery, decreasing oil production from mismanagement and technological inability to support their own wells, not known to manufacture one, single world class good or service of any kind, an Air Force of oxidizing antiques, a Navy that won't leave its docks, and leaning heavily on North Koreans, I still think they are, and a minimum, ten years away from anything other than SCUD.
36 posted on 05/03/2008 10:18:35 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tlj18
The US has for more than half a century paid in blood and treasure, with out asking more than land to bury the dead. The notion that somehow the US is debted to anyone is Orwellian.
37 posted on 05/03/2008 10:21:55 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

No one said here that the US was debted to anyone. That is a straw man. And the North Koreans aren’t the only source of technology for Iran. Underestimating a strategic threat involving nuclear and ballistic missile technology is positively Clintonian and Carteresque.


38 posted on 05/03/2008 11:01:21 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

I’m all for such a defence system in Europe. We will surely benefit. What I’m asking myself though is where does the radioactive waste come down when a missile heading to the US gets shot down?


39 posted on 05/03/2008 11:40:45 AM PDT by avid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
I'm not suggesting that we are indebted to anyone militarily (we all know that we are financially indebted BIGTIME), but it is expected that for us to have missile defense sites on someone else's soverign territory (Poland), they would want something else in return. I'm typing this in Germany where I am stationed. It is my understanding that under our Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Germans, we give them money in order for us to be based here. Plus, the areas surrounding the Army posts here get a major economic advantage. Although at present there is a massive reduction of forces going on in Germany. I will be leaving my post for another one in Germany in a little over a month. It sucks to be on dying military communities. If we couldn't order things on the Internet, we would be hurting bad. I'm talking about stuff for your uniform and the like. Or you have to drive around the country to find it.

And now I'm way off topic :-)

40 posted on 05/03/2008 12:03:46 PM PDT by tlj18 (Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
You wouldn't make much of a platoon leader. Peering through the fog to close with what actually exist is what all leaders attempt. Whether it's the building next door, or an strategic enterprise of an enemy. But why? Because of economy of force. Even our military doesn't have, nor will have enough money, men, to counter all imagined threats. The resources are limited and rationed. Iran doesn't now, and will not for a minimum of five to ten years have either nuclear weapons nor even short range missile delivery. I can't help you with that. It's a fact. That is not underestimating, just an attempt to close in with the reality as it is now, and in the near future. Expending money and resources on distant threats at the expense of existing and near term threats is actually worse than Carter/Clinton do nothing in that under the Carter/Clinton example the men, money are still existing, unspent and possibly salvaged for future use. Money gone, men wasted have to be replaced. All good commanders husband their resources and don't post field them for every risk.

The Iranians are not and will not be a strategic threat to the US for decades. But, if you want to babble on about it, go ahead. Anyways, back where I started, since Europe is the main beneficiary of this effort, I'm still wondering why the EU hasn't broken out the checkbook. What is it with this notion that the US taxpayer has to pay to attempt to keep the Iranians from dropping a nuclear weapon on a European city?

41 posted on 05/03/2008 1:16:12 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tlj18
Actually, it's not so much that the US is in debt, as much as the world wants to, and has done so for 200 years, shove money at us. If you have ten billion you need to place, there's not too many places in the world that have the economy that can instantly place that sum, with a good chance of getting it back. Why do you think US Treasury notes only pay a touch, if that, above inflation? Because people all over the world like us and want to give us their money for free? No, because when we go looking for money, there are ten people bidding to lend. To be very simplistic, it isn't us, it's everyone else. It's not that we have to borrow, it's that they have to lend. It isn't demand, it is over supply.

The EU seems to think that the Iranians are going to develop short range, nuclear/NBC/dirty armed missiles. Which oddly, our purposed interceptor system works against. But, um the Iranians will leave them alone. Later the Iranians will develop strategic, US reaching missiles and why should Europe get involved. I'm kind of the notion that as officially stated that this present system is for Europe reaching missiles. That the Iranians will pressure Europe. That this defense can only strength Europe against Iran. I see Europes complaints as a mixture of leftist delusion, or basically boiled down to 'yes protect us but pay us for you efforts'.

42 posted on 05/03/2008 1:36:36 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

“since Europe is the main beneficiary of this effort”

Have you wondered why no one in Europe really wants to host It If that’s so great for Europe ?


43 posted on 05/03/2008 1:42:15 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

LOL Then you really better get it from Pootie. I not sure the good ol USA can scrape that much together right now.


44 posted on 05/03/2008 2:04:37 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246
I'm not a big fan of European choices. I usually bet against them.
45 posted on 05/03/2008 2:06:45 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

You may not understand the situation.

First of all, the missile defense site in eastern Europe will be positioned perfectly to conduct intercepts of Iranian missiles. That is why we’re looking for a site there.

Secondly, Poland, especially their special forces, have been an extremely active ally in the war on terror. Upgrading their capabilities will strengthen both our defenses.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iy-zyxhTJSA

Lastly, Poland is now a new member of NATO and they need to upgrade their military from the Warsaw Pact model. It is much better if they look to the US for these upgrades than if they feel compelled to look east.


I do understand that and understand it is to Polands advantage to have that in place as well. This iS WHY I find in galling on behalf of Poland to try to extort money from US. It certainly is not THEIR technology making this happen. They should be grateful not trying to blackmail us for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.


46 posted on 05/03/2008 4:14:10 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

“The Iranians are not and will not be a strategic threat to the US for decades.”

My God what a perfectly ridiculously ignorant statement.


47 posted on 05/03/2008 8:13:24 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

This bothers the Russians no end as they tend to look weak and unable to protect their Mullah friends - nor Syrian allies.


48 posted on 05/03/2008 8:33:21 PM PDT by FARS (Good Thoughts (lead to ) Good Words (which combine into) Good Deeds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

whatever.


49 posted on 05/03/2008 10:20:50 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

We gave aid to every European country under the Marshall Plan after WWII.

Poland, a country which made many contributions to the winning Allied effort, got zilch.

They are due. And it is money well spent. I will be very upset if we piss away our special relationship with Poland.

It’s no secret that many in our State Department have no love of Poland, because they are a very conservative country (i.e., they don’t kowtow to the Gay mafia).


50 posted on 05/03/2008 10:26:42 PM PDT by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson