Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Library Won't Release Berger Documents
CNS News ^

Posted on 05/05/2008 4:06:54 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: smalltownslick
This doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. If Berger stole these documents to hide something, why would they end up in the library? (Hiding in plain sight....?)

Trying to get so many copies of the same document suggests that he wasn't interested in destroying the original, but rather handwritten comments on some copies. I wonder if XXX-42 said something about Osama bin Ladin which people in a meeting wrote down that would be damning to his administration after 9/11.

21 posted on 05/05/2008 4:49:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Yes, they all have national security vaults run by the Archives and the material is only available to scholars with the appropriate clearances and approvals. This is separate from the non classified papers which still require you be an approved scholar and approved to see the papers you’ve requested. The President (or his representative) can with hold documents. For example Lyndon Johnson’s financial records are still pretty much sealed from public view. His estate is preventing people getting a look. From reading Caro’s books on Johnson you know there was a lot of corruption (he was the wealthiest president: at least when he left office though most was in his wife’s name.)


22 posted on 05/05/2008 4:57:50 AM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If the liebrary has the documents, it’s game over anyway. What ever secrets Burglar risked all to hide have been sanitized out of the documents. Why GWB let Sandy off so easily is beyond understanding.


23 posted on 05/05/2008 4:58:18 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Nixon tried that for years by setting up a separate foundation but that finally got folded into the National Archives system a few years ago. Johnson’s library has lots of stuff that scholars can’t see. I think both the Kennedy and Roosevelt libraries still have a lot of sealed material.


24 posted on 05/05/2008 5:05:34 AM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Yes a presidential library is allowed to hold classified documents form the time of that president. I tried to get a job a few years ago at the Nixon library which required a high level clearance due to papers concerning the Vietnam war in its archives.


25 posted on 05/05/2008 5:11:07 AM PDT by Liaison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Just wait for the next round of tornadoes. Giant mobile homes most susceptible.
26 posted on 05/05/2008 5:24:52 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Every time I read something about the Hamburgler I get really steamed. It reminds me that the Clintons are the LAST people we need in the White House.


27 posted on 05/05/2008 5:39:19 AM PDT by Fox_Mulder77 (McCain's FR tag: McLlort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402; clee1

From

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200805/NAT20080505c.html

Berger later called the archives to tell them he found two of the documents, but not the other two.

.
Inexcusable how these documents got out, inventory should have been high priority. The 2 Berger found will keep Clinton out of the White House if unreleased, I suspect, the people’s curiosity will override their love for the Clinton’s.


28 posted on 05/05/2008 5:42:56 AM PDT by Son House (God Enlightened me through Charles Gibson, the top Income Tax Rate Should be 15% too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
If true, why does Berger get to walk in the light of day as a free man? There is something horribly wrong.

a deal was cut with the Bush administration, heck Bush even got them to reduce sandy burlgar's already low judgement

29 posted on 05/05/2008 5:46:47 AM PDT by Liberty2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Anyone else would’ve done at least 10 years in a federal pen.


30 posted on 05/05/2008 5:48:37 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Meanwhile, the revered Lee Hamilton sits on Sandy Berger’s Board of Reference at Sandy’s Stonebridge International consulting firm. What a joke.


31 posted on 05/05/2008 5:57:19 AM PDT by cookcounty (Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Nothing will ever override a Clinton worshipper’s love for the Clintons.


32 posted on 05/05/2008 6:01:33 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

As part of his conviction agreement, Berger was to surrender himself to the FBI for a polygraph test.

He hasn’t showed up yet.


33 posted on 05/05/2008 6:02:29 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Isn't this a confession to possession of stolen property?
34 posted on 05/05/2008 6:03:25 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers us three choices: surrender, kill them, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

35 posted on 05/05/2008 6:15:55 AM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sr4402
Do we have any inkling of what is in them that Sandy risked so much to get them

Maybe not, but here's something we DO know:
The risk involved in NOT taking them was obviously more than the risk of the punishment FOR taking them.

36 posted on 05/05/2008 6:19:35 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Do you know where those documents have been?


37 posted on 05/05/2008 6:23:33 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Berger acts like a common crook, yet he’s still regarded as some kind of national security expert, which he is not. He’s a lobbyist for the People’s Republic of China. He obviously took the documents because they were empbarrassing - after he made a phone call to Clinton’s lawyer.


38 posted on 05/05/2008 6:42:41 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Ain't got no money, but I got guns, religion, and xenophobia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library will not make available to the public the documents that former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger illegally took from the National Archives in 2003.

A letter from the library said, "Since Sandy Berger illegally took the documents from the Archives they technically don't exist so it follows that we don't have them."

There fixed it.
Clinotian parsing added for clarity :-)

39 posted on 05/05/2008 6:49:22 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

You know, Hillary has had so much experience from the White House days. Will McCain bring up anything about the ongoing deplorable Clinton charade that is being swallowed up by socialist media and the enablers? Nah, that wouldn’t be prudent.


40 posted on 05/05/2008 7:01:29 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson