Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$2 Billion Uranium Enrichment Plant Coming to Bonneville County(Idaho)
localnews8.com ^ | May 6, 2008 | staff

Posted on 05/07/2008 8:22:06 AM PDT by kellynla

AREVA, a French-based company, has chosen Bonneville County, Idaho, as the site for its first U.S. uranium enrichment facility.

"While we had several attractive sites to choose from, we opted for Idaho Falls, which has strong ties to nuclear energy, and which welcomed AREVA and its proposed enrichment facility to become a new member of its community," said Michael McMurphy, President of Areva Inc. "We look forward to a productive and long-term partnership that will deliver diversity and strength to the regional economy."

The $2 billion plant will be built 18 miles west of Idaho Falls, close to the Idaho National Laboratory, and will employ more than 1,000 workers to construct the building, which will take several years to finish. Once the plant is done, more than 250 people will be employed full-time to process natural uranium to use in domestic commercial nuclear power plants.

The proposed timeline is:

A design for the plant and acquiring the needed state and federal approvals will take about two to three years. By 2011, the construction phase of the plant will begin. AREVA plans to have the plant operational by 2014. The Regional Development Alliance estimated the overall economic impact to the region would be approximately $5.1 billion.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: energy; idaho; nuclear; uranium
Now you're talking!!!
1 posted on 05/07/2008 8:22:06 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Good stuff.


2 posted on 05/07/2008 8:25:31 AM PDT by Uncledave (Journalists resent bloggers for the same reason prostitutes resent nymphomaniacs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Since it’s French owned maybe we could pay them to reprocess our spent fuel rods instead of following Carters dictate and letting them waste away in swimming pools.


3 posted on 05/07/2008 8:27:20 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Maybe they could open some French saw mills so the loggers in Idaho can get back to work.


4 posted on 05/07/2008 8:31:13 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

It is about time we started reprocessing here instead of sending it to France.

Still, it burns me that we had a fast breeder reactor on the drawing board in 1994 when the Clintonistas ash-canned it due to “proliferation fears.”

Since the FBR project was scrapped, India, Pakistan and possibly North Korea are confirmed nuclear powers, Libya was aborted, and Iran is on the fast track. Oh, and we’re back to talking about burying tons of high-level waste that could be reprocessed into usable fuel in Yucca Mountain. Talk about an unproductive use of a limited resource.

Shows that the typical idiotic babbling from leftists on nuclear power is useless. I wish the GOP would grow a set and humiliate the clowns who come up on Capitol Hill to protest against nuclear power.


5 posted on 05/07/2008 8:33:23 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234

But the sailors going through training out there in the desert love those pools for a nice cool dip.


6 posted on 05/07/2008 8:34:04 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
The project you refer to, the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR), is a very technically sweet innovation on the closed fuel cycle. All reprocessing is done on site. Fresh fuel comes in the front door, and every year or so a few aspirin tablet-sized pieces of non-recoverable waste comes out the back door. Everything else stays put. There are no trainloads of "spent" fuel moving about the country bound for Yucca Mountain, no plutonium in circulation, no diversion concerns.

Clinton (probably Hillary more than Bill) killed the IFR just prior to their demonstrating it's feasibility using the EBR-II in Idaho as a test bed. It would be helpful to the industry if it succeeded, you see, and they couldn't have that. Instead, they took the funds from IFR and allocated them to decommissioning the IFR. Smart anti-nuke move, that. Not only kill the program, but destroy the test facility so if someone later wants to revive the idea, they won't have a place to test it.

7 posted on 05/07/2008 8:58:25 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; Cyber Liberty; patton; chimera; neverdem
Instead, they took the funds from IFR and allocated them to decommissioning the IFR. Smart anti-nuke move, that. Not only kill the program, but destroy the test facility so if someone later wants to revive the idea, they won't have a place to test it.

But she claims she's “for” the environment ....

8 posted on 05/07/2008 9:35:06 AM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer; Delphinium; EternalVigilance; Keyes2000mt; Sir_Ed; Knitting A Conundrum; ...
Where it all began...
The FR Idaho Ping List
FReepmail GOP_Raider to be on or off this list

9 posted on 05/07/2008 10:44:39 AM PDT by GOP_Raider (Maybe next year...I guess...Let's Go Sharks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Great news for Idaho and the USA!

I grew up in Idaho falls and Pocatello, and the nuke industry west of IF has provided good jobs for thousands over the years.

Don't know if it's still there, but the Navy used to have their nuclear power production school there. My cousin met/married a sailor attending the school.

10 posted on 05/07/2008 11:24:51 AM PDT by Don Carlos (I love Denver in the summer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
It is about time we started reprocessing here instead of sending it to France.

This is not reprocessing spent fuel. It's taking natural uranium and producing a product with more U-235 in it. Natural uranium is about 0.72% U-235. A reactor that could use that would be huge. If you increase the amount of fissionable U-235 to about (IIRC) 2% or so, the reactor core for a nuclear power plant can be smaller. The enrichment for ship reactors is much higher than that, so the core is as small as possible.

11 posted on 05/07/2008 12:25:33 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

I had read somewhere that we were buying weapons grade fissile material from Russia, Ukraine, some of the *stan countries and sending it to France for processing into power reactor fuel.

Was this an incorrect report?


12 posted on 05/07/2008 1:26:28 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Anybady can make a claim.


13 posted on 05/07/2008 1:37:47 PM PDT by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
I had read somewhere that we were buying weapons grade fissile material from Russia, Ukraine, some of the *stan countries and sending it to France for processing into power reactor fuel. Was this an incorrect report?

Been doing it for over 15 years now as part of the Nunn-Lugar Act. The Soviets had literally tones of weapons grade stuff and the decision was made back when the USSR disolved that it would be wise to get it out of those places before it got sold to the 'wrong' people.

14 posted on 05/07/2008 1:57:02 PM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

AREVA is only one partner, Denison Mines Ltd out of Canada is the other major partner.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DML.TO

Good times for Idaho and Idahoans, energy independence is around the corner.


15 posted on 05/07/2008 2:09:50 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos
Yes, I went through S1W 30 years ago, but it has since been deactivated. My eldest was born in Idaho Falls.

Two other training plants were also up there: A1W (prototype for the aircraft carrier (Enterprise-sized) reactors, and S1G (I think that was the number over there). It was the prototype for a silent running natural convention submarine reactor. It worked OK, but was only used once in the fleet.

Now, training is in Charleston in an old submarine permanently mounted for training in the harbor. Not sure if its better than being out in the desert, but the very old reactors really are not right after that many years for the risks of training cycles.

16 posted on 05/07/2008 2:52:11 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Nope - S5G was Narwhal’s prototype out at INEL. S1G was the earlier Seawolf reactor.


17 posted on 05/07/2008 2:58:02 PM PDT by Robert A. Cook, PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander; thackney

“energy independence is around the corner?”

Do you know something we don’t or are you just being optimistic. LOL


18 posted on 05/07/2008 3:12:31 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
My cousins husband was in the Enterprise-size school in the late 50's. He was slated for the Enterprise while going to school with big E still under construction, and spent virtually his whole career on her. Does that make him a "planker"?

The guy had a great career, and retired as an E-9 at 20 years. Believe he made E-7 around 8 years and MCPO at 13!

19 posted on 05/07/2008 4:31:12 PM PDT by Don Carlos (I love Denver in the summer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Well I was talking about reprocessing spent fuel, not new fuel.

And I also trained at S1W back in the early 70s. Did you guys ever go to “Skate City” up near the top of the building?


20 posted on 05/07/2008 5:19:33 PM PDT by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson