Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fired for rescuing a co-worker from assault
Hotair ^ | 5/08/2008 | AllahPundit

Posted on 05/08/2008 2:22:37 PM PDT by hatfieldmccoy

Mark Beverly probably didn’t expect a hero’s welcome when he returned to his convenience-store job after fighting off an assault on a co-worker from a would-be robber, but he certainly didn’t expect to get fired, either. Super America, which operates a large chain of gas stations and convenience stores in the Midwest, terminated Beverly for violating the policy of the company by fighting with the robber. The termination leaves Beverly without unemployment benefits as well


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armedcitizen; banglist; ccw; markbeverly; rkba; superamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last
A link to the corporate email form is included in the comments section
1 posted on 05/08/2008 2:22:37 PM PDT by hatfieldmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy
He's a hero in my book. Super America doesn't need people who do the right thing working for them. It needs no one working for them, period.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 05/08/2008 2:26:00 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy
"A link to the corporate email form is included in the comments section"

Wouldn't a link to the Trial Lawyers Association be more appropriate?

If they didn't fire him for violating company policy, the next employee who did that and got hurt feelings or worse would be able to sue for millions.

Unintended consequences...

3 posted on 05/08/2008 2:26:46 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy
My email to the dweebs at corporate

I had the opportunity to read the story concerning the heroics of Mr Beverly to save a fellow employee from harm and the pathetic response to his action by (not so)Super America. Mark Beverly has a great deal to proud of, Super America has a great deal to be ashamed of. It is this kind of intractable, moronic, knee jerk Dilbert corporate response that should, at the least, be embarrassing for the organization. I can only hope the public in your market area chooses to do business with other companies that are blessed with at least a modicum of common sense.

4 posted on 05/08/2008 2:28:12 PM PDT by hatfieldmccoy (Satan has a new name and it is Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

A similar incident happened at a Whole Foods Market near me in Ann Arbor. I don’t know if the worker ever got his job back.


5 posted on 05/08/2008 2:30:54 PM PDT by stayathomemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
Its a feeble excuse. I'm sure if his co-worker had been severely injured or God forbid - murdered - the company's lawyers would have been happy. One should always do the right thing, regardless of the bottom line. That's the way I was raised. And a company that doesn't respect that from me as a human being and an employee will never see a resume from me.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 05/08/2008 2:31:08 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

when lawyers, insurance companies, and frat boys rule the world...


7 posted on 05/08/2008 2:32:42 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I'm over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

I was nearly killed last summer by a clerk chasing a shoplifter. I was walking past the store, first the thief plowed into me, but I managed to stay on my feet, then the clerk plowed into me and threw me into the street. The intersection I was thrown into was usually extremely busy...this day, it was uncharacteristically empty (thank God).

I understand why stores tell their employees to NOT chase shoplifters.


8 posted on 05/08/2008 2:32:45 PM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

Typical liberal “I’m afraid of lawsuits so submit to violence” attitude. I wish I still had a company I would hire this guy right now. If he is young enough he should consider the military, they don’t fire your butt because you defend someone.


9 posted on 05/08/2008 2:34:57 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
I understand why stores tell their employees to NOT chase shoplifters.

I guess you didn't read the article. He didn't chase anyone, he saved a female employee from being beaten to death of being sent to the hospital. Guess you are all for letting that happen, huh?

10 posted on 05/08/2008 2:36:31 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
Wouldn't a link to the Trial Lawyers Association be more appropriate? If they didn't fire him for violating company policy, the next employee who did that and got hurt feelings or worse would be able to sue for millions.

Spoken like a true denizen of the the 21st Century. Always consider the legal ramifications of any action before responding to an emergency.

Just keep walking past anyone laying on the ground during cardiac arrest.

11 posted on 05/08/2008 2:38:49 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
"Always consider the legal ramifications of any action before responding to an emergency."

In this dammed crazy world of John Edwards we live in, trying to help anyone with a health issue, such as cardiac arrest, very well COULD open you up for civil liability. Lets say you attempt CPR and the person dies. Their family could come after you in court.

12 posted on 05/08/2008 2:43:03 PM PDT by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Indeed.......sad.


13 posted on 05/08/2008 2:44:06 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
Chasing a shop-lifter is one thing. Preventing a fellow employee from being injured or killed is another thing. That's called self-defense and for the morons who run Super America - it involves no legal liability. None whatsoever. If the company sends the message it doesn't value the lives of its own employees, it doesn't deserve to remain in business. Period.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

14 posted on 05/08/2008 2:44:19 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo

Sorry, I can’t agree, and I’ve had the same happen to me, but it was a cop chasing a creep. So should cops never chase anyone? In my case, it was a crowded shopping mall, so firing their sidearm is absolutely out of the question.


15 posted on 05/08/2008 2:44:26 PM PDT by Clock King (Under revision...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I actually appreciate your tagline.


16 posted on 05/08/2008 2:45:10 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I'm over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

LOL......Simple and easy to live by. Long ago enforced upon me by senior NCO’s with experience and skills.

Stay safe Sir !


17 posted on 05/08/2008 2:47:23 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

Sounds sort of like my job. If you see someone stealing product offically your supposed to be “Pleasent but Present” and if they walk out with a product, you can’t pursue them past your door. And god forbid if a customer takes a swing at you and you hit back.

So someone breaks my glass counter top and swipes a few grand in ipods I’m supposed to ask them “Would you like buy a fm transmitter or a 30 dollar case along with a new counter?”


18 posted on 05/08/2008 2:47:52 PM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Lets say you attempt CPR and the person dies. Their family could come after you in court.

I don't care.

19 posted on 05/08/2008 2:58:04 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

There is one condition that puts the company between a rock and a hard place. If they were to encourage workers to defend themselves they would be open to lawsuits if they were injured or killed.

If that is the case I would like them to have the balls to say so, otherwise firing them is bad bad PR.


20 posted on 05/08/2008 2:58:46 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul
Going after a shoplifter may cost the company more than it recovers. Property can be replaced. On the other hand - a human life can't. I think Mark Beverly has excellent grounds to sue for wrongful termination. Saving a human being isn't yet illegal in America.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

21 posted on 05/08/2008 3:00:06 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Are you telling me if you're a worker, you would sit by and do nothing while someone assaults your fellow co-worker? If that's the price it would take for you to keep your job, I don't know how you can live with yourself or face God and your wife and children.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

22 posted on 05/08/2008 3:02:06 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

“Lets say you attempt CPR and the person dies. Their family could come after you in court.”

Most states have something called a “Good Samaritan Law” which prevents such lawsuits. (I won’t live anyplace that doesn’t.) Next excuse?


23 posted on 05/08/2008 3:09:29 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

where the hell did I say that??????????????


24 posted on 05/08/2008 3:09:52 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
"Lets say you attempt CPR and the person dies. Their family could come after you in court."

Most states have "Good Samaritan" laws that prevent that.

25 posted on 05/08/2008 3:11:11 PM PDT by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The good Samaritan laws in most states would cover that, if the person did it without intent to cause harm. The catch then becomes “intent.”
When I worked as a lifeguard, some pools lived in the fear of doing the right thing and getting sued anyway.


26 posted on 05/08/2008 3:11:25 PM PDT by republicanequestrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

I didn’t realize there were 2 other comments about the law... Not trying to shove it in your face. :)


27 posted on 05/08/2008 3:14:03 PM PDT by republicanequestrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
I understand why stores tell their employees to NOT chase shoplifters.

You are not to chase a shoplifter because you might bump into someone? Funny.

28 posted on 05/08/2008 3:14:49 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calex59
I guess you didn't read the article. He didn't chase anyone, he saved a female employee from being beaten to death of being sent to the hospital. Guess you are all for letting that happen, huh?

What the heck? You take one poster's relating his personal experience and assume he's for letting all criminals run free? Talk about an irrational jump to conclusions.

29 posted on 05/08/2008 3:24:32 PM PDT by scan59 (Markets regulate better than government can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

http://www.speedway.com/ContactUs/EmailUs.aspx


30 posted on 05/08/2008 3:24:49 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy
I sent this email to Marathon Oil Company. They are the Parent company of Super America ________________________________________________ Is Bozo the clown running your Super America Company? I sent this letter to your sibling Super America web site. I’m sure that you have heard by now about the employee who was fired for trying to stop an assault and not a robbery. Since I sent this letter, I will ne mentioning a far bigger target to my sleazy Lawyer I know that he look to name you as a defendant in his suggested actions. It will be fun to watch the fall out of the action by some spineless individuals. Your ex-employee has more balls than your whole organization has shown. You people work for a stupid spineless liberal organization. You make perfect idiots of yourselves and then find out that you are almost isolated in assessing the value of your employee. What the hell is wrong with you? Don’t you see the tremendous loss in Public Image for this action? The employee was not fighting a robbery. He was defending a co-worker. I would do the same thing whether an employee or a person on the street. It is not called bravery; it is called helping my fellow wo/man. You have some real morons in your company. If you want to make good and to recover from your stupid public image, you would quietly reassign the moron who is responsible for this bonehead move and re-hire your brave employee. Give him an award for doing the responsible thing. Please let me know your response to my email. Admittedly, I do not live in your area of coverage, but I do have friends and family who will hear about this and I will ask them to do the responsible thing and punish such a stupid company. I will be trying to find a way to contact the fired employee and putting him in contact with a particularity sleazy Lawyer I know that will delight in this case. He probably already has made the contact. I dislike Lawyers as a whole, but this guy is so bad that I think he would be a perfect man for the job. I would really enjoy seeing him take you down so far that when you lick your lips, your feet will get wet. Tom Walsh [H] (732) 787-7644 [C] (732) 687-9144 twalsh73@comcast.net
31 posted on 05/08/2008 3:32:16 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

I fixed soome typos. The HTML format of the included email made this ne big paragraph, sorry!

Tom

I sent this email to Marathon Oil Company. They are the Parent company of Super America ________________________________________________ Is Bozo the clown running your Super America Company? I sent this letter to your sibling Super America web site. I’m sure that you have heard by now about the employee who was fired for trying to stop an assault and not a robbery. Since I sent this letter, I will be mentioning a far bigger target to my sleazy friend (?). I know that he will look to name you as a defendant in his suggested actions. It will be fun to watch the fall out of the action by some spineless individuals. Your ex-employee has more balls than your whole organization has shown. You people work for a stupid spineless liberal organization. You make perfect idiots of yourselves and then find out that you are almost isolated in assessing the value of your employee. What the hell is wrong with you? Don’t you see the tremendous loss in Public Image for this action? The employee was not fighting a robbery. He was defending a co-worker. I would do the same thing whether it was an employee or a person on the street. It is not called bravery; it is called helping my fellow wo/man. You have some real morons in your company. If you want to make good and to recover from your stupid public image, you would quietly reassign the moron who is responsible for this bonehead move and re-hire your brave employee. Give him an award for doing the responsible thing. Please let me know your response to my email. Admittedly, I do not live in your area of coverage, but I do have friends and family who will hear about this and I will ask them to do the responsible thing and punish such a stupid company. I will be trying to find a way to contact the fired employee and putting him in contact with a particularity sleazy Lawyer I know that will delight in this case. He probably already has made the contact. I dislike Lawyers as a whole, but this guy is so bad that I think he would be a perfect man for the job. I would really will enjoy seeing him take you down so far that when you lick your lips, your feet will get wet. Tom Walsh [H] (732) 787-7644 [C] (732) 687-9144 twalsh73@comcast.net


32 posted on 05/08/2008 3:39:00 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: scan59
What the heck? You take one poster's relating his personal experience and assume he's for letting all criminals run free? Talk about an irrational jump to conclusions.

Yep, I sure do because he made it plain he thought no one should do anything to stop crime if they are employees of said company where crime is occurring.

Jumping to conclusions? I don't think so, the guy was bitching about being knocked down in a parking lot by someone chasing criminals and said nothing about the article per se. The only conclusion one could reach is he thinks you should just let the criminals go and to hell with it.

I simply told he a**hat that a girls life was on the line and the guy in the article was a hero, at least that was the gist of it. Now, if you think his statement was relevant to the article and that he was advocating employees of companies give a hand and stop crime when they see it, please send me the part of his comment that I missed. On the other hand if you reread his comment and you see that there was no mention of the guy(in the article) being a hero or of employees having the right to defend fellow employees, maybe you should rethink your idiotic comment to me.

33 posted on 05/08/2008 3:40:02 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
“Always consider the legal ramifications of any action before responding to an emergency.”

Change the word legal to moral or ethical or Christian and you have the right judgment value.

34 posted on 05/08/2008 3:43:34 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
If a person were dying and the appropriate action was CPR and there was no Mouth to mouth guard, Would you wait?

I wouldn't and couldn't. I am not wired that way. I would say a prayer and hope for the best. There is no wrong answer to the question. a snap moral, ethical and Christian decision has and your conscience needs to live with the outcome.

I intend no judgment in this post.

35 posted on 05/08/2008 3:55:48 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: noname07718
Well, I'm with you on that, but I'm not exactly following how that pertains to what I posted about Good Samaritan laws. I was basically saying that the threat of being taken to court and sued if you render aid and the person dies was not really an issue thanks to those types of laws.

Again, I agree with what you said, but I'm just trying to make the connection between the two different topics.

???

36 posted on 05/08/2008 4:05:02 PM PDT by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul
So someone breaks my glass counter top and swipes a few grand in ipods I’m supposed to ask them “Would you like buy a fm transmitter or a 30 dollar case along with a new counter?”

No! You're supposed to offer them the 3 year extended warranty on those Ipods! Back to training for you!

/sarcasm

37 posted on 05/08/2008 4:06:29 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; goldstategop
"Just keep walking past anyone laying on the ground during cardiac arrest."

"I'm sure if his co-worker had been severely injured or God forbid - murdered - the company's lawyers would have been happy."

If I had to make my point so obvious that everyone could 'get it', it wouldn't have been any fun.

Don't take it too serious guys. It wasn't what you thought.

38 posted on 05/08/2008 4:08:14 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
"In this dammed crazy world of John Edwards we live in..."

LOL! I actually thought about including John Edward with the Trial Lawyers Association email recommendation I made earlier.

39 posted on 05/08/2008 4:12:46 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: noname07718
"Change the word legal to moral or ethical or Christian and you have the right judgment value."

Unfortunately, ethical or Christian values have NO regard in our current legal 'industry'. It's all money and victimization. Someone has to be blamed for EVERYTHING that happens and be made to pay the PRICE.

40 posted on 05/08/2008 4:25:23 PM PDT by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
I appreciate your clarification. I was going off to a side bar with offering my reaction and the legal aspects of the quandary should not be the first or even a consideration in rendering aid to a person in need.

Again, I intended no moral judgment of any individual's action I wish you peace; Tom

41 posted on 05/08/2008 4:55:16 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

Thanks for the clarification. No offense taken. My brain just didn’t make the connection (I suspect I’m low on caffeine today).


42 posted on 05/08/2008 6:05:13 PM PDT by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Can you believe I have been reading this forum over the years and this is the first post I get to make? lol

Anyway, pertaining to this Beverly fellow.

Good Samaritan laws in Minnesota require a person at the scene of an emergency to provide reasonable assistance to any person in need. If you do not, you can be charged with a misdemeanor

Now, dialing 911 is also regarded as assistance, but rightly so if this guy choose to assist in preventing any further damage being done to the young lady in the manner he did, wouldn’t he be protected by the law in this instance?

Since the method of assistance is not defined beyond “dialing emergency numbers” but could very well include any act in regards to assistance beyond that, wouldn’t the company forbidding assistance ( as noted by his dismissal from his job ) be encouraging a violation of law?

Probably not, but just a thought I had when I read this. I hope I’m right though and this guy can get his job back based on that or at least something. Cowardice should not be rewarded while courage and decency is punished.


43 posted on 05/08/2008 7:46:48 PM PDT by midmoschmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

“If a person were dying and the appropriate action was CPR and there was no Mouth to mouth guard, Would you wait?”

Actually I don’t think you have to worry anymore. Seems like I remember reading recently that mouth-to-mouth was no longer recommended during CPR.

Just chest compressions.


44 posted on 05/08/2008 7:56:29 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: midmoschmo; Squantos; hiredhand
this guy can get his job back based on that or at least something. Cowardice should not be rewarded while courage and decency is punished.

If I were Mr Beverly, I would NOT want my job back...

I once worked a lil quickie mart...the 3rd shift guy that trained me came in, placed his pistol next to the register in full view [located outta reach from the counter] of customers...I was asked if I 'had a gun'...

a 'good' job is one where you know yer back is covered...

45 posted on 05/09/2008 6:12:56 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
chest compression [heart beat/blood flow] and 'breathing' are two separate animals...

you must check for both and give both when needed as I understood it...my .02...

46 posted on 05/09/2008 6:16:42 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Choose Liberty over slavery... the gulag awaits ANY compromise with evil...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

The problem is that everyone is afraid of lawyers... they should be afraid of me.


47 posted on 05/09/2008 6:17:32 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hatfieldmccoy

How did they deny his unemployment benefits.

If you’re fired, even for cause, you’re still entitled to that which you paid in.


48 posted on 05/09/2008 6:21:47 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

Just chest compressions. There’s enough oxygen in the blood to keep the brain alive 3+ minutes, but you have to keep the blood flowing. Here’s a good quote:

“Presently, only 1 in 4 patients in cardiac arrest receives bystander CPR. Studies have found that bystanders are more willing to start resuscitation efforts if mouth-to-mouth ventilations are not required. In addition, continuous-chest-compression CPR is less complex and therefore easier to learn and remember. It is important to realize that, even when chest compressions are performed continuously and properly on a person in cardiac arrest, the blood flow they generate is so weak that any interruption in chest compressions, even for breathing, lowers the chances of survival.”

It’s from this link:

http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/116/25/e566


49 posted on 05/09/2008 6:38:09 AM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: freepertoo
I understand why stores tell their employees to NOT chase shoplifters.

If it were a shoplifter and the most likely outcome if he chose not to intervene was the guy's exit with the stuff, then you might be right. But it wasn't; he stepped in to save a co-worker from getting the crap beat out of them.

50 posted on 05/09/2008 6:42:51 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson